Rural-Urban Disparities in State-Level Diabetes Prevalence Among US Adults, 2021.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Olga Khavjou, Zohra Tayebali, Pyone Cho, Kristopher Myers, Ping Zhang
{"title":"Rural-Urban Disparities in State-Level Diabetes Prevalence Among US Adults, 2021.","authors":"Olga Khavjou, Zohra Tayebali, Pyone Cho, Kristopher Myers, Ping Zhang","doi":"10.5888/pcd22.240199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We assessed state-level disparities in diabetes prevalence among adults in rural and urban areas in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We estimated state-specific diabetes prevalence in rural and urban areas in 41 states with applicable data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Rural areas were defined based on the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. We estimated diabetes odds ratios (ORs) in rural versus urban areas in each state by using logistic regressions adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and obesity status. Analyses were conducted in 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In rural areas, diabetes prevalence was 14.3%, ranging from 8.4% in Colorado to 21.3% in North Carolina. In urban areas, the prevalence was 11.2%, ranging from 6.9% in Colorado to 15.5% in West Virginia. Unadjusted diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas were significant (P < .05) and greater than 1 for 19 states. After adjusting for age, sex, race, and ethnicity, the ORs were significant and greater than 1 for 7 states (Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, Oregon, and Virginia). With additional adjustment for education, income, and obesity status, diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas remained significant and greater than 1 for 2 states (North Carolina and Oregon).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reveal significant geographic disparities in diabetes prevalence between rural and urban areas in 19 states. The differences in most states may have been explained by rural-urban differences in sociodemographic characteristics and obesity rates. Our findings could inform decision makers to identify effective ways to reduce rural-urban disparities within states.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"E05"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd22.240199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We assessed state-level disparities in diabetes prevalence among adults in rural and urban areas in the United States.

Methods: We estimated state-specific diabetes prevalence in rural and urban areas in 41 states with applicable data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Rural areas were defined based on the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. We estimated diabetes odds ratios (ORs) in rural versus urban areas in each state by using logistic regressions adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and obesity status. Analyses were conducted in 2023.

Results: In rural areas, diabetes prevalence was 14.3%, ranging from 8.4% in Colorado to 21.3% in North Carolina. In urban areas, the prevalence was 11.2%, ranging from 6.9% in Colorado to 15.5% in West Virginia. Unadjusted diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas were significant (P < .05) and greater than 1 for 19 states. After adjusting for age, sex, race, and ethnicity, the ORs were significant and greater than 1 for 7 states (Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, Oregon, and Virginia). With additional adjustment for education, income, and obesity status, diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas remained significant and greater than 1 for 2 states (North Carolina and Oregon).

Conclusion: Our findings reveal significant geographic disparities in diabetes prevalence between rural and urban areas in 19 states. The differences in most states may have been explained by rural-urban differences in sociodemographic characteristics and obesity rates. Our findings could inform decision makers to identify effective ways to reduce rural-urban disparities within states.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventing Chronic Disease
Preventing Chronic Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal established by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. The mission of PCD is to promote the open exchange of information and knowledge among researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and others who strive to improve the health of the public through chronic disease prevention. The vision of PCD is to be the premier forum where practitioners and policy makers inform research and researchers help practitioners and policy makers more effectively improve the health of the population. Articles focus on preventing and controlling chronic diseases and conditions, promoting health, and examining the biological, behavioral, physical, and social determinants of health and their impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality across the life span.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信