{"title":"Prediction models for post-traumatic stress disorder in family members of ICU patients: A systematic review.","authors":"Xinyu Zhang, Xiao Sun, Qianqian Cao, Qihong Li, Rongqing Li, Zikai Zhang, Jinxia Jiang, Li Zeng","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several predictive models have been developed for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in intensive care unit (ICU) family members. However, significant differences persist across related studies in terms of literature quality, model performance, predictor variables and scope of applicability.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to systematically review risk prediction models for PTSD in family members of ICU patients, to make recommendations for health care professionals in selecting appropriate predictive models.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP database, Wanfang database, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, The Cochrane Library, Embase and OVID were searched from inception to 1 May 2024. Two independent researchers conducted literature screening, data extraction and applied a risk of bias assessment tool for predictive models to evaluate included studies. The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024560815).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies were included, with sample sizes ranging from 32 to 2734. Incidence rates of outcomes ranged from 1.6% to 63.6%. The most frequently used predictors were relative's female sex, longer duration of ICU stay, patient's death in the ICU and type of relationship with the patient. Two models reported area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.73 to 0.74; only three models reported calibration, and one study conducted internal validation. Overall, the 17 studies showed good applicability but exhibited a high risk of bias, particularly in data analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research on predictive models for PTSD risk in family members of ICU patients is in the developmental stage. Future studies should validate existing models or develop high-performance localized predictive models.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>PTSD can have a significant impact on the families of ICU patients, making early identification of high-risk populations essential for health care professionals to implement timely interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Several predictive models have been developed for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in intensive care unit (ICU) family members. However, significant differences persist across related studies in terms of literature quality, model performance, predictor variables and scope of applicability.
Aim: This study aimed to systematically review risk prediction models for PTSD in family members of ICU patients, to make recommendations for health care professionals in selecting appropriate predictive models.
Study design: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP database, Wanfang database, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, The Cochrane Library, Embase and OVID were searched from inception to 1 May 2024. Two independent researchers conducted literature screening, data extraction and applied a risk of bias assessment tool for predictive models to evaluate included studies. The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024560815).
Results: Seventeen studies were included, with sample sizes ranging from 32 to 2734. Incidence rates of outcomes ranged from 1.6% to 63.6%. The most frequently used predictors were relative's female sex, longer duration of ICU stay, patient's death in the ICU and type of relationship with the patient. Two models reported area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.73 to 0.74; only three models reported calibration, and one study conducted internal validation. Overall, the 17 studies showed good applicability but exhibited a high risk of bias, particularly in data analysis.
Conclusions: Research on predictive models for PTSD risk in family members of ICU patients is in the developmental stage. Future studies should validate existing models or develop high-performance localized predictive models.
Relevance to clinical practice: PTSD can have a significant impact on the families of ICU patients, making early identification of high-risk populations essential for health care professionals to implement timely interventions.
背景:针对重症监护病房(ICU)家庭成员的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),已经建立了几种预测模型。然而,相关研究在文献质量、模型性能、预测变量和适用范围等方面存在显著差异。目的:本研究旨在系统回顾ICU患者家属PTSD的风险预测模型,为医护人员选择合适的预测模型提供建议。研究设计:检索中国国家知识基础设施、维普数据库、万方数据库、中国医学信息网、PubMed、Web of Science、护理与联合健康文献累积索引、Cochrane图书馆、Embase和OVID,检索时间从成立至2024年5月1日。两名独立研究人员进行文献筛选、数据提取,并应用预测模型的偏倚风险评估工具对纳入的研究进行评估。该系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(注册号:CRD42024560815)。结果:纳入17项研究,样本量从32到2734不等。结果发生率从1.6%到63.6%不等。最常用的预测因素是亲属的女性、ICU住院时间较长、患者在ICU死亡以及与患者的关系类型。两个模型报告的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)值在0.73 ~ 0.74之间;只有三个模型报告了校准,一个研究进行了内部验证。总体而言,17项研究显示出良好的适用性,但显示出较高的偏倚风险,特别是在数据分析中。结论:ICU患者家属PTSD风险预测模型研究尚处于发展阶段。未来的研究应验证现有模型或开发高性能的局部预测模型。与临床实践的相关性:创伤后应激障碍可对ICU患者的家庭产生重大影响,因此早期识别高危人群对卫生保健专业人员实施及时干预至关重要。
期刊介绍:
Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics.
Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories:
-research reports
-literature reviews
-developments in practice, education or management
-reflections on practice