Survivorship of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Single Healthcare System's 23-Year Experience.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Perry L Lim, Anoop K Prasad, Mehdi S Salimy, Christopher M Melnic, Hany S Bedair
{"title":"Survivorship of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Single Healthcare System's 23-Year Experience.","authors":"Perry L Lim, Anoop K Prasad, Mehdi S Salimy, Christopher M Melnic, Hany S Bedair","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is increasingly favored in clinical practice due to its favorable long-term survival rates, positive clinical outcomes, and expedited recovery. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain a formidable complication in knee arthroplasty, and guidelines for the management are limited. This study aims to assess the failure rates of débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in UKAs, providing insights into optimal treatment management and infection-free survival for PJI in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria of PJI, as defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, and were retrospectively reviewed from January 2000 to September 2023. Surgical treatment included 17 DAIRs (78%), six one-stage revision procedures (20%), and three two-stage revision procedures (12%). Seventeen patients (78%) had acute hematogenous infections (<3 weeks of symptoms). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was done for reinfection and revision procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall infection-free survival and all-cause survival regardless of management at 3 years was 60.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.7% to 89.6%) and 55.8% (95% CI, 38.2% to 81.5%), respectively. Both two-stage and one-stage revision procedures had an infection-free survivorship of 100% at 3 years (95% CI, 100% to 100%). DAIR treatment had an infection-free survival at 3 years of 41.6% (95% CI, 22.4% to 77.4%). Nine of 17 patients (53%) undergoing DAIR were unsuccessful and required subsequent second DAIR, one-stage, or two-stage revision procedures.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The efficacy of DAIR following PJI in UKA is notably limited, suggesting a need for reevaluation of its role in managing UKA PJIs. Given the absence of established guidelines for PJI management specifically tailored to UKA, there is an urgent and compelling need for future studies to elucidate optimal clinical strategies to allow for the best treatment for patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is increasingly favored in clinical practice due to its favorable long-term survival rates, positive clinical outcomes, and expedited recovery. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain a formidable complication in knee arthroplasty, and guidelines for the management are limited. This study aims to assess the failure rates of débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in UKAs, providing insights into optimal treatment management and infection-free survival for PJI in this context.

Methods: Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria of PJI, as defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, and were retrospectively reviewed from January 2000 to September 2023. Surgical treatment included 17 DAIRs (78%), six one-stage revision procedures (20%), and three two-stage revision procedures (12%). Seventeen patients (78%) had acute hematogenous infections (<3 weeks of symptoms). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was done for reinfection and revision procedures.

Results: The overall infection-free survival and all-cause survival regardless of management at 3 years was 60.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.7% to 89.6%) and 55.8% (95% CI, 38.2% to 81.5%), respectively. Both two-stage and one-stage revision procedures had an infection-free survivorship of 100% at 3 years (95% CI, 100% to 100%). DAIR treatment had an infection-free survival at 3 years of 41.6% (95% CI, 22.4% to 77.4%). Nine of 17 patients (53%) undergoing DAIR were unsuccessful and required subsequent second DAIR, one-stage, or two-stage revision procedures.

Discussion: The efficacy of DAIR following PJI in UKA is notably limited, suggesting a need for reevaluation of its role in managing UKA PJIs. Given the absence of established guidelines for PJI management specifically tailored to UKA, there is an urgent and compelling need for future studies to elucidate optimal clinical strategies to allow for the best treatment for patients.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

单室膝关节置换术中假体周围关节感染的生存率:单一医疗保健系统23年的经验。
单室膝关节置换术(UKA)由于其良好的长期生存率、积极的临床结果和快速的恢复,在临床实践中越来越受到青睐。假体周围关节感染(PJIs)仍然是膝关节置换术中一个可怕的并发症,治疗指南有限。本研究旨在评估在UKAs中使用DAIR、抗生素和假体保留(DAIR)的失败率,为这种情况下PJI的最佳治疗管理和无感染生存提供见解。方法:回顾性分析2000年1月至2023年9月25例符合肌肉骨骼感染学会标准的PJI纳入标准的患者。手术治疗包括17例(78%),6例一期翻修(20%)和3例两期翻修(12%)。17例(78%)患者发生急性血源性感染(结果:3年总无感染生存率为60.1%(95%可信区间[CI], 45.7% ~ 89.6%),全因生存率为55.8% (95% CI, 38.2% ~ 81.5%)。两期和一期翻修手术的3年无感染生存率均为100% (95% CI, 100%至100%)。DAIR治疗的3年无感染生存率为41.6% (95% CI, 22.4%至77.4%)。17例患者中有9例(53%)接受DAIR治疗不成功,需要随后的第二次DAIR、一期或两期翻修手术。讨论:DAIR在UKA PJI后的疗效明显有限,提示需要重新评估其在UKA PJI管理中的作用。鉴于缺乏专门针对UKA的PJI管理的既定指南,迫切需要未来的研究来阐明最佳临床策略,以便为患者提供最佳治疗。证据等级:III级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信