Interpreter Modalities and Unplanned Emergency Department Revisits in Limited English Proficiency Patients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clara Pavesi-Krieger, Rachel Yang, Alex Plezia, Veena Hamill, Tatiana Barriga, Megan A Rech, Theresa Nguyen
{"title":"Interpreter Modalities and Unplanned Emergency Department Revisits in Limited English Proficiency Patients.","authors":"Clara Pavesi-Krieger, Rachel Yang, Alex Plezia, Veena Hamill, Tatiana Barriga, Megan A Rech, Theresa Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency department encounters include an increasing number of patients with limited English proficiency, yet little is known about the impact of interpreter services on unplanned revisits to the emergency department. This study aims to assess interpreters' utilization and unplanned ED revisits, serving as an indicator of care quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of ED visits at an urban academic center between January and April 2019. Inclusion criteria involved patients aged >18, discharged after evaluation, and with at least 1 ED revisit in the study period. Demographic data, interpreter modality, and revisit incidences within 72 hours and 30 days were analyzed using Chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 786 reviewed charts, 401 limited English proficiency patients and 294 controls matched by gender, race, and ethnicity were included. Among limited English proficiency patients, the majority identified as Hispanic (84.8% vs 36%, P<.01) and showed higher 72-hour unplanned revisit rates (2.8% vs 0.7%, P = .05). Interpreter documentation for limited English proficiency patients was only 49.6%, with in-person modality prevailing (45.8%). Trained interpreters were underutilized (13% in-person vs 7.7% video, P<.0001). Only 78% (P<.01) of patients with limited English proficiency received discharge instructions in their preferred language.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study reveals a higher unplanned ED revisit rate among limited English proficiency patients, potentially linked to varying interpreter modality effectiveness and underutilization of trained interpreters. Emphasizing the critical role of trained interpreters, these findings offer an opportunity to enhance care quality for limited English proficiency patients in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.12.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department encounters include an increasing number of patients with limited English proficiency, yet little is known about the impact of interpreter services on unplanned revisits to the emergency department. This study aims to assess interpreters' utilization and unplanned ED revisits, serving as an indicator of care quality.

Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of ED visits at an urban academic center between January and April 2019. Inclusion criteria involved patients aged >18, discharged after evaluation, and with at least 1 ED revisit in the study period. Demographic data, interpreter modality, and revisit incidences within 72 hours and 30 days were analyzed using Chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Results: Of 786 reviewed charts, 401 limited English proficiency patients and 294 controls matched by gender, race, and ethnicity were included. Among limited English proficiency patients, the majority identified as Hispanic (84.8% vs 36%, P<.01) and showed higher 72-hour unplanned revisit rates (2.8% vs 0.7%, P = .05). Interpreter documentation for limited English proficiency patients was only 49.6%, with in-person modality prevailing (45.8%). Trained interpreters were underutilized (13% in-person vs 7.7% video, P<.0001). Only 78% (P<.01) of patients with limited English proficiency received discharge instructions in their preferred language.

Discussion: This study reveals a higher unplanned ED revisit rate among limited English proficiency patients, potentially linked to varying interpreter modality effectiveness and underutilization of trained interpreters. Emphasizing the critical role of trained interpreters, these findings offer an opportunity to enhance care quality for limited English proficiency patients in the emergency department.

英语水平有限患者的口译方式与意外急诊科复诊。
导读:急诊科就诊包括越来越多的英语水平有限的患者,但很少有人知道翻译服务对意外访问急诊科的影响。本研究旨在评估口译员的使用率和非计划性急诊科访问,作为护理质量的一个指标。方法:对2019年1月至4月期间某城市学术中心急诊科就诊情况进行单中心回顾性图表回顾。纳入标准为年龄在bb0 ~ 18岁,经评估出院,在研究期间至少有1次ED重访。使用卡方和Wilcoxon秩和检验分析72小时和30天内的人口统计数据、口译员模式和重访发生率。结果:在786份回顾的图表中,包括401名英语水平有限的患者和294名按性别、种族和民族匹配的对照组。在英语水平有限的患者中,大多数被确定为西班牙裔(84.8%对36%)。讨论:本研究揭示了英语水平有限的患者中更高的计划外ED重访率,这可能与不同的口译方式有效性和训练有素的口译人员的利用不足有关。强调训练有素的口译员的关键作用,这些发现提供了一个机会,以提高急诊部门英语水平有限的患者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信