Navigating HPV Vaccination: a Qualitative Study on Chinese Women's Decision-Making Experiences.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Danyu Li, Wen Zhang, Jennifer Stinson, Lindsay Jibb, Tieghan Killackey, Nicole Pope, Fan Wu, Changrong Yuan
{"title":"Navigating HPV Vaccination: a Qualitative Study on Chinese Women's Decision-Making Experiences.","authors":"Danyu Li, Wen Zhang, Jennifer Stinson, Lindsay Jibb, Tieghan Killackey, Nicole Pope, Fan Wu, Changrong Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02555-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This qualitative study explores the decision experiences of adult women regarding HPV vaccination, highlighting their decision needs, outcomes, and expected support. A qualitative descriptive study design was used. A semi-structured interview guide based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) was used to interview Chinese women (aged 18 to 45). These interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using deductive and inductive content analysis. Sociodemographic data were tabulated using descriptive statistics. Fifteen participants were interviewed, and three categories were constructed. (1) Unmet decision needs: participants have inadequate knowledge, biased knowledge sources, inadequate resources, and unrealistic expectations. (2) Current decision outcomes: the quality of decisions varied among participants, with some feeling satisfied and well-informed, while others expressed dissatisfaction due to unclear information and a lack of understanding. Twelve participants who decided to vaccinate adhered to their choice, managing side effects as expected. Three participants who chose not to vaccinate remained unvaccinated. (3) Expected decision support: participants expressed a need for systematic; reliable information presented in a user-friendly manner; improved access to vaccination services; and emotional support from family, friends, and healthcare providers to support making their HPV vaccine decision. Women deciding on HPV vaccination are facing several decision needs that need to be addressed. Future support targeting women's decision-making experience could provide them with better information, resource access, and emotional support, and eventually improve vaccination uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02555-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study explores the decision experiences of adult women regarding HPV vaccination, highlighting their decision needs, outcomes, and expected support. A qualitative descriptive study design was used. A semi-structured interview guide based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) was used to interview Chinese women (aged 18 to 45). These interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using deductive and inductive content analysis. Sociodemographic data were tabulated using descriptive statistics. Fifteen participants were interviewed, and three categories were constructed. (1) Unmet decision needs: participants have inadequate knowledge, biased knowledge sources, inadequate resources, and unrealistic expectations. (2) Current decision outcomes: the quality of decisions varied among participants, with some feeling satisfied and well-informed, while others expressed dissatisfaction due to unclear information and a lack of understanding. Twelve participants who decided to vaccinate adhered to their choice, managing side effects as expected. Three participants who chose not to vaccinate remained unvaccinated. (3) Expected decision support: participants expressed a need for systematic; reliable information presented in a user-friendly manner; improved access to vaccination services; and emotional support from family, friends, and healthcare providers to support making their HPV vaccine decision. Women deciding on HPV vaccination are facing several decision needs that need to be addressed. Future support targeting women's decision-making experience could provide them with better information, resource access, and emotional support, and eventually improve vaccination uptake.

导航HPV疫苗接种:中国妇女决策经验的定性研究。
本定性研究探讨了成年妇女关于HPV疫苗接种的决策经验,突出了她们的决策需求、结果和期望的支持。采用定性描述性研究设计。采用基于渥太华决策支持框架(ODSF)的半结构化访谈指南对18 - 45岁的中国女性进行访谈。这些访谈被记录、转录,并使用演绎和归纳内容分析进行分析。社会人口统计数据采用描述性统计制表。访谈了15名参与者,并构建了三类。(1)未满足的决策需求:参与者知识不足,知识来源有偏差,资源不足,期望不现实。(2)当前决策结果:参与者的决策质量各不相同,一些人感到满意和知情,而另一些人则因信息不清楚和缺乏理解而表示不满。12名决定接种疫苗的参与者坚持他们的选择,如预期的那样控制副作用。选择不接种疫苗的三名参与者仍然未接种疫苗。(3)预期决策支持:参与者表示需要系统性的;以用户友好的方式提供可靠的信息;改善获得疫苗接种服务的机会;以及来自家人、朋友和医疗保健提供者的情感支持,以支持他们接种HPV疫苗的决定。决定是否接种HPV疫苗的妇女面临着一些需要解决的决策需求。未来针对妇女决策经验的支持可以为她们提供更好的信息、资源获取和情感支持,并最终提高疫苗接种率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信