The Effectiveness of Pressure Injury Prevention Education for Patient Care Technicians in an Adult Acute Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Project.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Anna Yoo Chang, Kimberly Sue Haus McIltrot, Erin M Spaulding, Cynthia Walker
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Pressure Injury Prevention Education for Patient Care Technicians in an Adult Acute Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Anna Yoo Chang, Kimberly Sue Haus McIltrot, Erin M Spaulding, Cynthia Walker","doi":"10.1097/WON.0000000000001153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine whether hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) could be prevented by implementing an educational tool kit for patient care technicians (PCTs).</p><p><strong>Participants and setting: </strong>Data were collected from 24 PCTs and 43 patients in a 26-bed inpatient adult acute care unit at an academic medical center in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Outcome data were collected over an 8-week period from September to November 2021. Hospital-acquired pressure injury prevalence was collected using the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) survey process. Full- and part-time PCTs' knowledge and attitudes were assessed through modified Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge and Attitudes towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention Instruments. The PCTs' compliance with prevention strategies was assessed among patients using the modified NDNQI audit scores. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's Exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Among the 24 PCTs, 66.7% (n = 16) had received prior education on HAPI prevention strategies. Hospital-acquired or unit-acquired pressure injury prevalence rates did not change significantly following the educational intervention. Mean Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge scores increased from pre- to post-intervention (92.86; SD 9.63 vs 94.05; SD 12.86). Average Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention scores decreased from pre- to post-intervention (27.79; SD 4.88 vs 21.0; SD 7.51), indicating poorer attitudes toward pressure injury prevention. The mean NDNQI audit scores significantly improved from pre-implementation (M 1.40; SD 0.82, n = 20) to measurement following the intervention (M 2.35; SD 0.99, n = 23; P= .014).</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>An educational curriculum tailored for PCTs increased HAPI prevention strategies. The project site incorporated the HAPI prevention educational tool kit from this quality improvement project into their annual hospital-wide training for all PCTs to learn and implement HAPI prevention strategies in their work setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":49950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000001153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine whether hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) could be prevented by implementing an educational tool kit for patient care technicians (PCTs).

Participants and setting: Data were collected from 24 PCTs and 43 patients in a 26-bed inpatient adult acute care unit at an academic medical center in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.

Approach: Outcome data were collected over an 8-week period from September to November 2021. Hospital-acquired pressure injury prevalence was collected using the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) survey process. Full- and part-time PCTs' knowledge and attitudes were assessed through modified Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge and Attitudes towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention Instruments. The PCTs' compliance with prevention strategies was assessed among patients using the modified NDNQI audit scores. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's Exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis.

Outcomes: Among the 24 PCTs, 66.7% (n = 16) had received prior education on HAPI prevention strategies. Hospital-acquired or unit-acquired pressure injury prevalence rates did not change significantly following the educational intervention. Mean Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge scores increased from pre- to post-intervention (92.86; SD 9.63 vs 94.05; SD 12.86). Average Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention scores decreased from pre- to post-intervention (27.79; SD 4.88 vs 21.0; SD 7.51), indicating poorer attitudes toward pressure injury prevention. The mean NDNQI audit scores significantly improved from pre-implementation (M 1.40; SD 0.82, n = 20) to measurement following the intervention (M 2.35; SD 0.99, n = 23; P= .014).

Implications for practice: An educational curriculum tailored for PCTs increased HAPI prevention strategies. The project site incorporated the HAPI prevention educational tool kit from this quality improvement project into their annual hospital-wide training for all PCTs to learn and implement HAPI prevention strategies in their work setting.

成人急症护理人员压力伤害预防教育的有效性:一项质量改善计划。
目的:本质量改进项目的目的是确定是否可以通过实施患者护理技术人员(pct)的教育工具包来预防医院获得性压力伤害(HAPIs)。参与者和环境:数据来自美国大西洋中部地区一家学术医疗中心26张床位的住院成人急症护理病房的24名pct和43名患者。方法:在2021年9月至11月的8周时间内收集结局数据。使用国家护理质量指标数据库(NDNQI)调查过程收集医院获得性压力伤害患病率。通过改良的压伤预防知识和对压疮预防工具的态度来评估全职和兼职pct的知识和态度。采用改进的NDNQI审核评分对pct对预防策略的依从性进行评估。采用描述性统计、Fisher’s Exact检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行分析。结果:在24名pct中,66.7% (n = 16)接受过HAPI预防策略的事先教育。在教育干预后,医院获得性或单位获得性压力损伤患病率没有显著变化。平均压力伤害预防知识得分从干预前到干预后增加(92.86;SD 9.63 vs 94.05;SD 12.86)。对压疮预防的平均态度评分从干预前到干预后下降(27.79;SD 4.88 vs 21.0;SD 7.51),表明人们对压力伤害预防的态度较差。NDNQI审计平均分较实施前显著提高(m1.40;干预后测量的SD 0.82, n = 20)(均值2.35;SD 0.99, n = 23;P = .014)。实践意义:为pct量身定制的教育课程增加了HAPI预防策略。项目现场将这一质量改进项目提供的HAPI预防教育工具包纳入其全院范围的年度培训,以便所有pct在其工作环境中学习和实施HAPI预防战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
34.60%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​The Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (JWOCN), the official journal of the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society™ (WOCN®), is the premier publication for wound, ostomy and continence practice and research. The Journal’s mission is to publish current best evidence and original research to guide the delivery of expert health care. The WOCN Society is a professional nursing society which supports its members by promoting educational, clinical and research opportunities to advance the practice and guide the delivery of expert health care to individuals with wounds, ostomies and continence care needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信