A Dynamic Warm-Up Improves Titleist Performance Institute Screen Scores in Adult Golfers.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Andrew Skibski, Pradeep Vanguri, Jeffrey R Stout, Christopher D Ingersoll, L Colby Mangum
{"title":"A Dynamic Warm-Up Improves Titleist Performance Institute Screen Scores in Adult Golfers.","authors":"Andrew Skibski, Pradeep Vanguri, Jeffrey R Stout, Christopher D Ingersoll, L Colby Mangum","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Guidelines for various movement assessments often instruct clinicians to conduct testing without a warm-up. Warm-ups are commonly performed to increase heart rate, decrease stiffness, and prepare for sport-specific demands. Since athletes typically complete a warm-up prior to sport participation, evaluating biomechanics in this condition may provide a better indication of their bodies' physical capabilities. The primary purpose of this study was to compare scores on the Titleist Performance Institute (TPI) screen before and after a dynamic warm-up in adult golfers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Twenty-four adult golfers (19 male/5 female, age 44.0 [15.4] y, height 171.3 [8.6] cm, weight 82.5 [16.3] kg, average 18-hole score 90.7 [10.3] strokes) completed a single-session crossover laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed the TPI screen, which included 15 simple tests scored based on their ability to properly complete the movement. Following a rest and washout period, participants performed a brief dynamic warm-up including exercises for the extremities and trunk, followed by 30 seconds of practice golf swings. Participants immediately retested the TPI screen, following the same procedures. Composite and individual test scores were compared before and after the warm-up with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and r effect sizes at a significance of P ≤ .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TPI composite scores were significantly higher following the warm-up (median: 36, interquartile range 31/40) than before the warm-up (median: 33, interquartile range 28/36) (P < .001), with a large effect size (r = .81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest a warm-up leads to higher scores on the TPI screen, and that an athlete's warm-up condition should be considered when interpreting their performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Guidelines for various movement assessments often instruct clinicians to conduct testing without a warm-up. Warm-ups are commonly performed to increase heart rate, decrease stiffness, and prepare for sport-specific demands. Since athletes typically complete a warm-up prior to sport participation, evaluating biomechanics in this condition may provide a better indication of their bodies' physical capabilities. The primary purpose of this study was to compare scores on the Titleist Performance Institute (TPI) screen before and after a dynamic warm-up in adult golfers.

Design: Twenty-four adult golfers (19 male/5 female, age 44.0 [15.4] y, height 171.3 [8.6] cm, weight 82.5 [16.3] kg, average 18-hole score 90.7 [10.3] strokes) completed a single-session crossover laboratory study.

Methods: Participants completed the TPI screen, which included 15 simple tests scored based on their ability to properly complete the movement. Following a rest and washout period, participants performed a brief dynamic warm-up including exercises for the extremities and trunk, followed by 30 seconds of practice golf swings. Participants immediately retested the TPI screen, following the same procedures. Composite and individual test scores were compared before and after the warm-up with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and r effect sizes at a significance of P ≤ .05.

Results: TPI composite scores were significantly higher following the warm-up (median: 36, interquartile range 31/40) than before the warm-up (median: 33, interquartile range 28/36) (P < .001), with a large effect size (r = .81).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest a warm-up leads to higher scores on the TPI screen, and that an athlete's warm-up condition should be considered when interpreting their performance.

动态热身提高成人高尔夫球手的头衔表表现研究所屏幕分数。
背景:各种运动评估指南经常指导临床医生在没有热身的情况下进行测试。热身通常是为了提高心率,减少僵硬,为特定的运动要求做准备。由于运动员通常在参加运动前完成热身,在这种情况下评估生物力学可以更好地表明他们的身体能力。本研究的主要目的是比较成年高尔夫球手在动态热身前后在Titleist Performance Institute (TPI)屏幕上的得分。设计:24名成年高尔夫球手(男19名,女5名,年龄44.0[15.4]岁,身高171.3 [8.6]cm,体重82.5 [16.3]kg,平均18洞杆数90.7[10.3]杆数)完成单期交叉实验室研究。方法:参与者完成TPI筛选,其中包括15个简单的测试,根据他们正确完成运动的能力进行评分。在休息和洗脱期之后,参与者进行了一个简短的动态热身,包括四肢和躯干的锻炼,然后是30秒的高尔夫挥杆练习。参与者立即按照相同的程序重新测试TPI筛选。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较热身前后的综合和单项测试成绩,r效应量P≤0.05。结果:热身后TPI综合评分(中位数:36,四分位范围为31/40)显著高于热身前(中位数:33,四分位范围为28/36)(P < 0.001),且效应量较大(r = 0.81)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,热身会导致更高的TPI屏幕得分,并且在解释运动员的表现时应考虑运动员的热身情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信