Andrew Skibski, Pradeep Vanguri, Jeffrey R Stout, Christopher D Ingersoll, L Colby Mangum
{"title":"A Dynamic Warm-Up Improves Titleist Performance Institute Screen Scores in Adult Golfers.","authors":"Andrew Skibski, Pradeep Vanguri, Jeffrey R Stout, Christopher D Ingersoll, L Colby Mangum","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Guidelines for various movement assessments often instruct clinicians to conduct testing without a warm-up. Warm-ups are commonly performed to increase heart rate, decrease stiffness, and prepare for sport-specific demands. Since athletes typically complete a warm-up prior to sport participation, evaluating biomechanics in this condition may provide a better indication of their bodies' physical capabilities. The primary purpose of this study was to compare scores on the Titleist Performance Institute (TPI) screen before and after a dynamic warm-up in adult golfers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Twenty-four adult golfers (19 male/5 female, age 44.0 [15.4] y, height 171.3 [8.6] cm, weight 82.5 [16.3] kg, average 18-hole score 90.7 [10.3] strokes) completed a single-session crossover laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed the TPI screen, which included 15 simple tests scored based on their ability to properly complete the movement. Following a rest and washout period, participants performed a brief dynamic warm-up including exercises for the extremities and trunk, followed by 30 seconds of practice golf swings. Participants immediately retested the TPI screen, following the same procedures. Composite and individual test scores were compared before and after the warm-up with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and r effect sizes at a significance of P ≤ .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TPI composite scores were significantly higher following the warm-up (median: 36, interquartile range 31/40) than before the warm-up (median: 33, interquartile range 28/36) (P < .001), with a large effect size (r = .81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest a warm-up leads to higher scores on the TPI screen, and that an athlete's warm-up condition should be considered when interpreting their performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Guidelines for various movement assessments often instruct clinicians to conduct testing without a warm-up. Warm-ups are commonly performed to increase heart rate, decrease stiffness, and prepare for sport-specific demands. Since athletes typically complete a warm-up prior to sport participation, evaluating biomechanics in this condition may provide a better indication of their bodies' physical capabilities. The primary purpose of this study was to compare scores on the Titleist Performance Institute (TPI) screen before and after a dynamic warm-up in adult golfers.
Design: Twenty-four adult golfers (19 male/5 female, age 44.0 [15.4] y, height 171.3 [8.6] cm, weight 82.5 [16.3] kg, average 18-hole score 90.7 [10.3] strokes) completed a single-session crossover laboratory study.
Methods: Participants completed the TPI screen, which included 15 simple tests scored based on their ability to properly complete the movement. Following a rest and washout period, participants performed a brief dynamic warm-up including exercises for the extremities and trunk, followed by 30 seconds of practice golf swings. Participants immediately retested the TPI screen, following the same procedures. Composite and individual test scores were compared before and after the warm-up with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and r effect sizes at a significance of P ≤ .05.
Results: TPI composite scores were significantly higher following the warm-up (median: 36, interquartile range 31/40) than before the warm-up (median: 33, interquartile range 28/36) (P < .001), with a large effect size (r = .81).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest a warm-up leads to higher scores on the TPI screen, and that an athlete's warm-up condition should be considered when interpreting their performance.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant.
JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.