Patient's sexual dignity discomfort in healthcare setting: A concept development.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Sihyun Park, Hyunji Woo, Yegyu Lee, Yejung Ko
{"title":"Patient's sexual dignity discomfort in healthcare setting: A concept development.","authors":"Sihyun Park, Hyunji Woo, Yegyu Lee, Yejung Ko","doi":"10.1177/09697330251314095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Body touch and close physical proximity are inevitable in some healthcare procedures and can evoke feelings of shame, humiliation, and anger in patients. Given the increasing recognition of human dignity, exploring the occurrence of these negative emotional experiences and identifying mechanisms for their prevention are crucial.<b>Aim:</b> To develop and define the concept of \"patient's sexual dignity discomfort.\" Design: A hybrid model of concept development was utilized.<b>Methods:</b> In the theoretical phase, a scoping review was conducted to establish a working definition of patient's sexual dignity discomfort. This definition was refined and validated using qualitative data collected during the fieldwork phase. In the analytical phase, a final conceptual model of patient's sexual dignity discomfort was proposed by integrating findings from both the theoretical and fieldwork phases.<b>Ethical considerations:</b> All participants completed an informed consent process, and interviews were conducted via Zoom or phone by a certified psychiatric nurse to ensure confidentiality, anonymity, and comfort.<b>Results:</b> Four themes describing attributes of patient's sexual dignity discomfort were explored: experiencing shame and embarrassment, vulnerability-induced loss of control, dehumanization and objectification, and uncertain sexual autonomy. Patient's sexual dignity discomfort occurs when patients perceive care procedures as sexually inappropriate or as involving unnecessary sexual activity, particularly when healthcare providers display unprofessional attitudes or when patients lack consent or are not mentally prepared for the procedure because of insufficient information. This discomfort leads patients to refuse or avoid healthcare treatments and prioritize finding better healthcare services over their health. It can also prompt providers to avoid patients, resulting in a compromised quality of care and poor health outcomes.<b>Conclusions:</b> Patient's sexual dignity discomfort poses a significant threat to the quality of patient care and preservation of dignity. Nurses can trigger this intentionally or unintentionally, highlighting the need for comprehensive education and training to prevent it.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251314095"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251314095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Body touch and close physical proximity are inevitable in some healthcare procedures and can evoke feelings of shame, humiliation, and anger in patients. Given the increasing recognition of human dignity, exploring the occurrence of these negative emotional experiences and identifying mechanisms for their prevention are crucial.Aim: To develop and define the concept of "patient's sexual dignity discomfort." Design: A hybrid model of concept development was utilized.Methods: In the theoretical phase, a scoping review was conducted to establish a working definition of patient's sexual dignity discomfort. This definition was refined and validated using qualitative data collected during the fieldwork phase. In the analytical phase, a final conceptual model of patient's sexual dignity discomfort was proposed by integrating findings from both the theoretical and fieldwork phases.Ethical considerations: All participants completed an informed consent process, and interviews were conducted via Zoom or phone by a certified psychiatric nurse to ensure confidentiality, anonymity, and comfort.Results: Four themes describing attributes of patient's sexual dignity discomfort were explored: experiencing shame and embarrassment, vulnerability-induced loss of control, dehumanization and objectification, and uncertain sexual autonomy. Patient's sexual dignity discomfort occurs when patients perceive care procedures as sexually inappropriate or as involving unnecessary sexual activity, particularly when healthcare providers display unprofessional attitudes or when patients lack consent or are not mentally prepared for the procedure because of insufficient information. This discomfort leads patients to refuse or avoid healthcare treatments and prioritize finding better healthcare services over their health. It can also prompt providers to avoid patients, resulting in a compromised quality of care and poor health outcomes.Conclusions: Patient's sexual dignity discomfort poses a significant threat to the quality of patient care and preservation of dignity. Nurses can trigger this intentionally or unintentionally, highlighting the need for comprehensive education and training to prevent it.

医疗环境中患者的性尊严不适:概念发展。
背景:身体接触和身体近距离接触在一些医疗过程中是不可避免的,可以引起患者的羞耻感、羞辱感和愤怒感。鉴于对人类尊严的日益认识,探索这些消极情绪体验的发生和确定预防机制至关重要。目的:发展和界定“患者性尊严不适”的概念。设计:采用概念开发的混合模式。方法:在理论阶段,进行范围审查,以建立一个工作定义的病人的性尊严不适。这一定义通过在实地工作阶段收集的定性数据进行了细化和验证。在分析阶段,通过整合理论和实地调查阶段的发现,提出了患者性尊严不适的最终概念模型。伦理考虑:所有参与者都完成了知情同意程序,并由一名有资格的精神科护士通过Zoom或电话进行访谈,以确保保密、匿名和舒适。结果:探讨了描述患者性尊严不适属性的四个主题:经历羞耻和尴尬、脆弱性导致的失控、非人化和物化、不确定的性自主。当患者认为护理程序在性方面不适当或涉及不必要的性活动时,特别是当医疗保健提供者表现出不专业的态度或当患者因信息不足而缺乏同意或对程序没有心理准备时,患者的性尊严不适就会发生。这种不适导致患者拒绝或避免医疗保健治疗,并优先考虑寻找更好的医疗保健服务而不是他们的健康。它还可能促使提供者避开患者,导致护理质量下降和健康状况不佳。结论:患者性尊严不适严重威胁到患者护理质量和尊严维护。护士可能有意或无意地引发这种情况,因此需要进行全面的教育和培训来预防这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信