Difference in stiffness-related functional disability between decompression alone and decompression with short segments fusion (1 or 2 levels) in the lower lumbar region: a propensity scores matching study.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hyun-Jun Kim, Jin-Sung Park, Se-Jun Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee
{"title":"Difference in stiffness-related functional disability between decompression alone and decompression with short segments fusion (1 or 2 levels) in the lower lumbar region: a propensity scores matching study.","authors":"Hyun-Jun Kim, Jin-Sung Park, Se-Jun Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Stiffness-related functional disability (SRFD) is a well-known complication after long-segment fusion surgery. However, SRFD following decompression with short-segment fusion (1 or 2 levels) compared with decompression alone surgery in the lower lumbar region, which accounts for a significant portion of lumbar range of motion, is poorly documented.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare SRFD after decompression alone (D-A) surgery and decompression with short-segment fusion (D+F) surgery in the lower lumbar region.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients who underwent D-A or D+F surgery at the lower lumbar region (L4 to S1) between 2016 and 2022, with a follow-up period of over 2 years, were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Outcome measure: </strong>The visual analog scale (VAS) for the back and leg, Oswestry disability index (ODI), specific functional disability index (SFDI) for SRFD, and lumbar range of motion (LROM) were evaluated as clinical and radiological outcomes preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We divided the lower lumbar region into three segments: L4-5, L5-S1, and L4-5-S1. Out Of the initial 425 patients, 32 pairs in the L4-5 segment, 36 pairs in the L5-S1 segment, and 27 pairs in the L4-5-S1 segment were included in the final cohort after conducting propensity score matching (1:1). Outcomes were compared between the two groups within each segment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up periods were 27.2, 26.1, and 26.5 months in each group, respectively. In L4-5, there was no difference in the VAS scores for leg pain, ODI, SFDI, and LROM. However, the VAS for back pain was significantly higher in the D+F group preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively (6.4±2.0 vs. 3.6±2.3, p=.001; 3.6±2.7 vs. 2.1±1.9, p=.046). In the L5-S1, VAS for back pain was significantly higher in the D+F group preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively (6.2±2.0 vs. 4.4±1.9, p=.001; 4.2±1.7 vs. 3.5±1.3, p=.034). The LROM was significantly lower in the D+F group at 1- and 2-year postoperatively (33.3±8.0° vs. 38.4±9.2°, p=.015; 32.4±7.3° vs. 36.8±9.4°, p=.032). However, the SFDI was higher in the D+F group only at 1 year postoperatively (22.4±7.7 vs. 19.2±5.2, p=.037). In the L4-5-S1, SFDI was significantly higher in the D+F group at 1- and 2-year postoperatively (1 yr: 22.7±7.7 vs. 17.1±7.9, p=.011; 2 yrs: 22.3±7.6 vs. 17.9±7.2, p=.001), LROM was significantly lower in the D+F group (1 yr: 24.1±8.3° vs. 37.0±8.4°, p=.001; 2 yrs: 25.0±6.9° vs. 38.2±6.4°, p=.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the L4-5 segment, there were no differences in LROM and SFDI between the D-A and D+F groups. At L5-S1, significant differences were noted in both parameters at 1-year postoperatively, but SFDI showed no significant differences by the 2-year mark, despite differences in LROM. For two-level fusion at L4-5-S1, significant differences in both LROM and SFDI persisted 2 years postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Stiffness-related functional disability (SRFD) is a well-known complication after long-segment fusion surgery. However, SRFD following decompression with short-segment fusion (1 or 2 levels) compared with decompression alone surgery in the lower lumbar region, which accounts for a significant portion of lumbar range of motion, is poorly documented.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare SRFD after decompression alone (D-A) surgery and decompression with short-segment fusion (D+F) surgery in the lower lumbar region.

Study design/setting: Retrospective observational study.

Patient sample: Patients who underwent D-A or D+F surgery at the lower lumbar region (L4 to S1) between 2016 and 2022, with a follow-up period of over 2 years, were reviewed.

Outcome measure: The visual analog scale (VAS) for the back and leg, Oswestry disability index (ODI), specific functional disability index (SFDI) for SRFD, and lumbar range of motion (LROM) were evaluated as clinical and radiological outcomes preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

Methods: We divided the lower lumbar region into three segments: L4-5, L5-S1, and L4-5-S1. Out Of the initial 425 patients, 32 pairs in the L4-5 segment, 36 pairs in the L5-S1 segment, and 27 pairs in the L4-5-S1 segment were included in the final cohort after conducting propensity score matching (1:1). Outcomes were compared between the two groups within each segment.

Results: The mean follow-up periods were 27.2, 26.1, and 26.5 months in each group, respectively. In L4-5, there was no difference in the VAS scores for leg pain, ODI, SFDI, and LROM. However, the VAS for back pain was significantly higher in the D+F group preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively (6.4±2.0 vs. 3.6±2.3, p=.001; 3.6±2.7 vs. 2.1±1.9, p=.046). In the L5-S1, VAS for back pain was significantly higher in the D+F group preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively (6.2±2.0 vs. 4.4±1.9, p=.001; 4.2±1.7 vs. 3.5±1.3, p=.034). The LROM was significantly lower in the D+F group at 1- and 2-year postoperatively (33.3±8.0° vs. 38.4±9.2°, p=.015; 32.4±7.3° vs. 36.8±9.4°, p=.032). However, the SFDI was higher in the D+F group only at 1 year postoperatively (22.4±7.7 vs. 19.2±5.2, p=.037). In the L4-5-S1, SFDI was significantly higher in the D+F group at 1- and 2-year postoperatively (1 yr: 22.7±7.7 vs. 17.1±7.9, p=.011; 2 yrs: 22.3±7.6 vs. 17.9±7.2, p=.001), LROM was significantly lower in the D+F group (1 yr: 24.1±8.3° vs. 37.0±8.4°, p=.001; 2 yrs: 25.0±6.9° vs. 38.2±6.4°, p=.001).

Conclusion: For the L4-5 segment, there were no differences in LROM and SFDI between the D-A and D+F groups. At L5-S1, significant differences were noted in both parameters at 1-year postoperatively, but SFDI showed no significant differences by the 2-year mark, despite differences in LROM. For two-level fusion at L4-5-S1, significant differences in both LROM and SFDI persisted 2 years postoperatively.

单纯减压与短节段融合减压(1节段或2节段)下腰椎区僵硬相关功能障碍的差异:倾向评分匹配研究
背景背景:僵硬相关功能障碍(SRFD)是长节段融合手术后常见的并发症。然而,与单纯下腰椎减压手术相比,减压合并短节段融合术(1或2节段)后的SRFD占腰椎活动范围的很大一部分,文献记载较少。目的:本研究旨在比较下腰椎区单纯减压(D- a)手术和减压合并短节段融合(D+F)手术后的SRFD。研究设计/设置:回顾性观察性研究。患者样本:回顾了2016年至2022年间在下腰椎区(L4至S1)接受D- a或D+F手术的患者,随访期超过2年。结果测量:术前及术后1年和2年,以背部和腿部的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、SRFD的特异性功能残疾指数(SFDI)和腰椎活动度(LROM)作为临床和影像学结果进行评估。方法:将下腰椎区分为L4-5、L5-S1和L4-5- s1三个节段。在最初的425例患者中,32对L4-5节段,36对L5-S1节段,27对L4-5- s1节段进行倾向评分匹配(1:1)后纳入最终队列。比较两组在每个节段内的结果。结果:两组患者平均随访时间分别为27.2个月、26.1个月、26.5个月。在L4-5中,腿部疼痛、ODI、SFDI和LROM的VAS评分没有差异。然而,D+F组术前和术后2年的腰痛VAS评分明显高于D+F组(6.4±2.0比3.6±2.3,p=0.001;3.6±2.7 vs. 2.1±1.9,p=0.046)。在L5-S1,术前和术后2年,D+F组腰痛VAS评分明显高于术前和术后2年(6.2±2.0比4.4±1.9,p=0.001;4.2±1.7 vs. 3.5±1.3,p=0.034)。D+F组术后1年和2年LROM明显降低(33.3±8.0°vs 38.4±9.2°,p=0.015;32.4±7.3°vs 36.8±9.4°,p=0.032)。然而,D+F组仅在术后1年SFDI较高(22.4±7.7比19.2±5.2,p=0.037)。在L4-5-S1,术后1年和2年,D+F组的SFDI明显更高(1年:22.7±7.7比17.1±7.9,p=0.011;2年:22.3±7.6比17.9±7.2,p=0.001), D+F组LROM显著降低(1年:24.1±8.3°比37.0±8.4°,p=0.001;2年:25.0±6.9°vs. 38.2±6.4°,p=0.001)。结论:对于L4-5节段,D- a组和D+F组LROM和SFDI无差异。在L5-S1,术后1年这两个参数均有显著差异,但SFDI在术后2年无显著差异,尽管LROM存在差异。对于L4-5-S1的两节段融合,术后2年LROM和SFDI的显著差异持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信