Tina L Leunbach, Francisca Yankovic, Alexander Springer, Amy Wisniewski, Berk Burgu, Luis Braga, Andreas Ernst, Angela Lucas-Herald, Stuart O'Toole, S Faisal Ahmed, Yazan F Rawashdeh
{"title":"An International Delphi Based Study for Developing A Core Outcome Set For Hypospadias Surgery.","authors":"Tina L Leunbach, Francisca Yankovic, Alexander Springer, Amy Wisniewski, Berk Burgu, Luis Braga, Andreas Ernst, Angela Lucas-Herald, Stuart O'Toole, S Faisal Ahmed, Yazan F Rawashdeh","doi":"10.1159/000541596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Explicit outcomes routinely measured across the life span following hypospadias surgery, defined by a core outcome set (COS), will harmonize and overcome reporting heterogeneity. Methods Age specific outcomes identified in a literature review were presented in a three round Delphi survey. Participants (professionals, parents and patients) were encouraged to suggest outcomes in the first Delphi round. In subsequent rounds participants were asked to choose and rank up to five preferred outcomes for each age. To be deemed core, an outcome needed over 70% of votes in a round. Results Professionals were mainly paediatric urologists (round 1, 2, 3: n=57 (77 %), 39 (78%), 35 (81%)). The response rates from parents/patients (round 1, 2, 3: n= 17, 5, 3) were low. In young boys (<6 years, 6-10 years) four core outcomes were identical (voiding, fistula, re-operation and urethral stricture). Core outcomes in boys aged 11-16 years (cosmesis, curvature, voiding, stricture and psychosocial status) and boys >16 years (cosmesis, curvature, erection, voiding and psychosexual development) varied more. Conclusion Outcomes to include in a COS were consistent in younger boys. A larger variety was observed in older boys and reflects less clarity on relevant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49536,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Development","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Explicit outcomes routinely measured across the life span following hypospadias surgery, defined by a core outcome set (COS), will harmonize and overcome reporting heterogeneity. Methods Age specific outcomes identified in a literature review were presented in a three round Delphi survey. Participants (professionals, parents and patients) were encouraged to suggest outcomes in the first Delphi round. In subsequent rounds participants were asked to choose and rank up to five preferred outcomes for each age. To be deemed core, an outcome needed over 70% of votes in a round. Results Professionals were mainly paediatric urologists (round 1, 2, 3: n=57 (77 %), 39 (78%), 35 (81%)). The response rates from parents/patients (round 1, 2, 3: n= 17, 5, 3) were low. In young boys (<6 years, 6-10 years) four core outcomes were identical (voiding, fistula, re-operation and urethral stricture). Core outcomes in boys aged 11-16 years (cosmesis, curvature, voiding, stricture and psychosocial status) and boys >16 years (cosmesis, curvature, erection, voiding and psychosexual development) varied more. Conclusion Outcomes to include in a COS were consistent in younger boys. A larger variety was observed in older boys and reflects less clarity on relevant outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Recent discoveries in experimental and clinical research have led to impressive advances in our knowledge of the genetic and environmental mechanisms governing sex determination and differentiation, their evolution as well as the mutations or endocrine and metabolic abnormalities that interfere with normal gonadal development. ‘Sexual Development’ provides a unique forum for this rapidly expanding field. Its broad scope covers all aspects of genetics, molecular biology, embryology, endocrinology, evolution and pathology of sex determination and differentiation in humans and animals. It publishes high-quality original research manuscripts, review articles, short reports, case reports and commentaries. An internationally renowned and multidisciplinary editorial team of three chief editors, ten prominent scientists serving as section editors, and a distinguished panel of editorial board members ensures fast and author-friendly editorial processing and peer reviewing.