Analyses of Adverse Drug Reactions to Fluoroquinolones in Spontaneous Reports Before and After the Referral and in Clinical Routine Cases.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Diana Dubrall, Julia Wicherski, Maike Below, Jan Görtzen-Patin, Matthias Schmid, Sven Zenker, Britta Haenisch, Bernhardt Sachs
{"title":"Analyses of Adverse Drug Reactions to Fluoroquinolones in Spontaneous Reports Before and After the Referral and in Clinical Routine Cases.","authors":"Diana Dubrall, Julia Wicherski, Maike Below, Jan Görtzen-Patin, Matthias Schmid, Sven Zenker, Britta Haenisch, Bernhardt Sachs","doi":"10.1007/s40268-024-00499-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In November 2018, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) restricted the use of fluoroquinolones (used by mouth, injections or inhalation) in the context of a referral due to long-lasting and potentially irreversible adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Fluoroquinolones should no longer be used to treat mild or moderate bacterial infections unless other antibacterials cannot be used.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The first aim of our study was to analyze whether in the period before compared with after the referral the characteristics of spontaneous ADR reports related to fluoroquinolones differed and whether specific ADRs were more frequently reported for fluoroquinolones compared with cotrimoxazole. Secondly, we analyzed whether the ADR profile differed between individual fluoroquinolones. Finally, the number of fluoroquinolone reports was considered in relation to the number of outpatient drug prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All spontaneous ADR reports from Germany received before the referral (01/2014-12/2019) and after the referral (01/2020-12/2022) for adults in which fluoroquinolones (n = 2575; n = 967) or cotrimoxazole (n = 299, n = 275) were reported as suspected/interacting were identified in the European ADR database, EudraVigilance. The ADR reports were descriptively analyzed concerning the reported characteristics. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression analyses, which were performed to investigate whether aortic aneurysms, retinal detachments, cardiac arrhythmias, peripheral polyneuropathies, nervous system disorders, toxic liver diseases and non-traumatic injuries of muscles, tendons and synovialis were more frequently reported for fluoroquinolones compared with cotrimoxazole. Stratified analyses between fluoroquinolones were conducted by calculating ORs and their 95% CIs by using two-by-two tables. Reporting rates were calculated by dividing the number of fluoroquinolone reports by the number of fluoroquinolone prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reporting rates of fluoroquinolones clearly increased until 2019 and decreased afterward. Only minor differences in the characteristics of fluoroquinolone reports (e.g., regarding the indications) were observed in reports received before and after the referral. In both periods, peripheral neuropathies, nervous system, and muscle and tendon disorders were more often reported for fluoroquinolones than cotrimoxazole. In the pooled fluoroquinolone-stratified analyses, (i) peripheral neuropathies and nervous system disorders were more frequently reported for ciprofloxacin, (ii) non-traumatic injuries of muscle, tendon, and synovialis were more often reported for levofloxacin, and (iii) cardiac arrhythmias and toxic liver diseases were more frequently reported for moxifloxacin compared with the other fluoroquinolones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In accordance with a reminder sent by the EMA referring to prescribing trends for fluoroquinolones, our study showed that the characteristics of spontaneous ADR reports for fluoroquinolones after the referral were similar to those before the referral, underlining the importance of adhering to the recommended restrictions issued by the EMA. In addition, we observed individual differences between ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin with regard to their ADR profile. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00499-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In November 2018, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) restricted the use of fluoroquinolones (used by mouth, injections or inhalation) in the context of a referral due to long-lasting and potentially irreversible adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Fluoroquinolones should no longer be used to treat mild or moderate bacterial infections unless other antibacterials cannot be used.

Objectives: The first aim of our study was to analyze whether in the period before compared with after the referral the characteristics of spontaneous ADR reports related to fluoroquinolones differed and whether specific ADRs were more frequently reported for fluoroquinolones compared with cotrimoxazole. Secondly, we analyzed whether the ADR profile differed between individual fluoroquinolones. Finally, the number of fluoroquinolone reports was considered in relation to the number of outpatient drug prescriptions.

Methods: All spontaneous ADR reports from Germany received before the referral (01/2014-12/2019) and after the referral (01/2020-12/2022) for adults in which fluoroquinolones (n = 2575; n = 967) or cotrimoxazole (n = 299, n = 275) were reported as suspected/interacting were identified in the European ADR database, EudraVigilance. The ADR reports were descriptively analyzed concerning the reported characteristics. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression analyses, which were performed to investigate whether aortic aneurysms, retinal detachments, cardiac arrhythmias, peripheral polyneuropathies, nervous system disorders, toxic liver diseases and non-traumatic injuries of muscles, tendons and synovialis were more frequently reported for fluoroquinolones compared with cotrimoxazole. Stratified analyses between fluoroquinolones were conducted by calculating ORs and their 95% CIs by using two-by-two tables. Reporting rates were calculated by dividing the number of fluoroquinolone reports by the number of fluoroquinolone prescriptions.

Results: Reporting rates of fluoroquinolones clearly increased until 2019 and decreased afterward. Only minor differences in the characteristics of fluoroquinolone reports (e.g., regarding the indications) were observed in reports received before and after the referral. In both periods, peripheral neuropathies, nervous system, and muscle and tendon disorders were more often reported for fluoroquinolones than cotrimoxazole. In the pooled fluoroquinolone-stratified analyses, (i) peripheral neuropathies and nervous system disorders were more frequently reported for ciprofloxacin, (ii) non-traumatic injuries of muscle, tendon, and synovialis were more often reported for levofloxacin, and (iii) cardiac arrhythmias and toxic liver diseases were more frequently reported for moxifloxacin compared with the other fluoroquinolones.

Conclusion: In accordance with a reminder sent by the EMA referring to prescribing trends for fluoroquinolones, our study showed that the characteristics of spontaneous ADR reports for fluoroquinolones after the referral were similar to those before the referral, underlining the importance of adhering to the recommended restrictions issued by the EMA. In addition, we observed individual differences between ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin with regard to their ADR profile. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.

转诊前后自发报告及临床常规病例氟喹诺酮类药物不良反应分析。
2018年11月,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)由于长期和潜在不可逆的药物不良反应(adr),限制了氟喹诺酮类药物(口服、注射或吸入)在转诊背景下的使用。氟喹诺酮类药物不应再用于治疗轻度或中度细菌感染,除非不能使用其他抗菌素。目的:本研究的第一个目的是分析转诊前与转诊后氟喹诺酮类药物自发性不良反应报告的特点是否不同,氟喹诺酮类药物的特异性不良反应报告频率是否高于复方新诺唑。其次,我们分析了不同氟喹诺酮类药物的不良反应情况是否存在差异。最后,考虑了氟喹诺酮类药物报告的数量与门诊药物处方的数量之间的关系。方法:在转诊前(2014年1月- 2019年12月)和转诊后(2020年1月- 2022年12月)收到的所有来自德国的自发不良反应报告,其中氟喹诺酮类药物(n = 2575;n = 967)或复方新诺明(n = 299, n = 275)在欧洲ADR数据库EudraVigilance中被鉴定为疑似/相互作用。对ADR报告的特点进行描述性分析。通过logistic回归分析估计优势比(ORs)及其95%置信区间(CIs),研究氟喹诺酮类药物是否比复方新诺唑类药物更常报告主动脉瘤、视网膜脱离、心律失常、周围多神经病变、神经系统疾病、中毒性肝病和肌肉、肌腱和滑膜的非外伤性损伤。采用二乘二表法对氟喹诺酮类药物进行or和95% ci的分层分析。报告率通过氟喹诺酮类药物报告数除以氟喹诺酮类药物处方数来计算。结果:氟喹诺酮类药物的报告率在2019年之前呈明显上升趋势,之后呈下降趋势。在转诊前后收到的报告中,仅观察到氟喹诺酮类药物报告的特征(例如,关于适应症)存在微小差异。在这两个时期,氟喹诺酮类药物比复方新诺唑类药物更常报告周围神经病变、神经系统和肌肉和肌腱疾病。在综合氟喹诺酮分层分析中,(i)环丙沙星更常报告周围神经病变和神经系统紊乱,(ii)左氧氟沙星更常报告肌肉、肌腱和滑膜的非创伤性损伤,(iii)与其他氟喹诺酮类药物相比,莫西沙星更常报告心律失常和中毒性肝脏疾病。结论:根据EMA关于氟喹诺酮类药物处方趋势的提醒,我们的研究显示,转诊后氟喹诺酮类药物自发不良反应报告的特征与转诊前相似,强调了遵守EMA建议限制的重要性。此外,我们观察到环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星在不良反应方面的个体差异。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs in Research & Development
Drugs in Research & Development Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy. The Journal includes: Clinical research on new and established drugs; Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development; Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered; Reviews may also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信