A Real-World Data Analysis of Alglucosidase Alfa in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yi Yin, Jie Jiang, Youpeng Jin
{"title":"A Real-World Data Analysis of Alglucosidase Alfa in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.","authors":"Yi Yin, Jie Jiang, Youpeng Jin","doi":"10.1007/s40268-024-00502-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Alglucosidase alfa for injection is used as an enzyme replacement therapy for the treatment of Pompe disease. The safety profile of alglucosidase alfa-associated adverse events requires a comprehensive evaluation. In this study, we aimed to identify drug safety alert signals and investigate the real-world safety of alglucosidase alfa to guide clinical decision making and optimize the risk-benefit balance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The adverse event reports from the first quarter of 2006 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were selected by exploring the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The new and unexpected potential adverse event signals were detected using a disproportionality analysis, including the reporting odds ratio, the proportional reporting ratio, the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and the empirical Bayes geometric mean. Then, the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities was used to systematically classify the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After analyzing 16,945,027 adverse event reports, a total of 4326 cases of adverse events related to alglucosidase alfa were identified, spanning 27 system organ classes. A total of 359 preferred terms of adverse events for glucosidase alpha were detected. Pyrexia ranked first, followed by pneumonia, dyspnea, respiratory failure, and disease progression according to occurrence frequency. The top three system organ classes were general disorders and administration-site conditions (n = 2466), respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (n = 1749), and infections and infestations (n = 1551). In addition to adverse effects mentioned in the product label, our study also discovered rare but high signal intensity adverse events such as chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are many adverse events associated with the clinical use of alglucosidase alfa, which should be closely monitored in the FAERS database. As the most effective enzyme replacement therapy for Pompe disease, it is crucial to closely monitor these adverse events. Ensuring patient safety while balancing drug effectiveness is particularly important.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00502-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Alglucosidase alfa for injection is used as an enzyme replacement therapy for the treatment of Pompe disease. The safety profile of alglucosidase alfa-associated adverse events requires a comprehensive evaluation. In this study, we aimed to identify drug safety alert signals and investigate the real-world safety of alglucosidase alfa to guide clinical decision making and optimize the risk-benefit balance.

Methods: The adverse event reports from the first quarter of 2006 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were selected by exploring the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The new and unexpected potential adverse event signals were detected using a disproportionality analysis, including the reporting odds ratio, the proportional reporting ratio, the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and the empirical Bayes geometric mean. Then, the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities was used to systematically classify the results.

Results: After analyzing 16,945,027 adverse event reports, a total of 4326 cases of adverse events related to alglucosidase alfa were identified, spanning 27 system organ classes. A total of 359 preferred terms of adverse events for glucosidase alpha were detected. Pyrexia ranked first, followed by pneumonia, dyspnea, respiratory failure, and disease progression according to occurrence frequency. The top three system organ classes were general disorders and administration-site conditions (n = 2466), respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (n = 1749), and infections and infestations (n = 1551). In addition to adverse effects mentioned in the product label, our study also discovered rare but high signal intensity adverse events such as chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis.

Conclusions: There are many adverse events associated with the clinical use of alglucosidase alfa, which should be closely monitored in the FAERS database. As the most effective enzyme replacement therapy for Pompe disease, it is crucial to closely monitor these adverse events. Ensuring patient safety while balancing drug effectiveness is particularly important.

FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中Alfa糖苷酶的真实数据分析
背景与目的:注射用alfa葡糖苷酶是治疗庞贝病的一种酶替代疗法。醛葡萄糖苷酶相关不良事件的安全性需要进行全面的评估。在本研究中,我们旨在识别药物安全预警信号,并研究alfa的实际安全性,以指导临床决策并优化风险-收益平衡。方法:通过查阅美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,选取2006年第一季度至2023年第四季度的不良事件报告。使用歧化分析检测新的和意想不到的潜在不良事件信号,包括报告优势比、比例报告比、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络和经验贝叶斯几何平均。然后,使用《监管活动医学词典》对结果进行系统分类。结果:在分析了16,945,027例不良事件报告后,共鉴定出与α糖苷酶相关的不良事件4326例,涉及27个系统器官类别。总共检测到359个葡萄糖苷酶不良事件的首选项。发热排在首位,其次是肺炎、呼吸困难、呼吸衰竭和疾病进展。排在前三位的系统器官类别是一般疾病和给药部位疾病(n = 2466),呼吸、胸腔和纵隔疾病(n = 1749),感染和侵染(n = 1551)。除了产品标签中提到的不良反应外,我们的研究还发现了罕见但高信号强度的不良事件,如慢性复发性多灶性骨髓炎。结论:与临床使用α糖苷酶相关的不良事件有很多,应在FAERS数据库中密切监测。作为Pompe病最有效的酶替代疗法,密切监测这些不良事件至关重要。在平衡药物有效性的同时确保患者安全尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs in Research & Development
Drugs in Research & Development Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy. The Journal includes: Clinical research on new and established drugs; Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development; Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered; Reviews may also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信