Situational Analysis of the Medication Practices in Brazilian Hospitals: A Multicenter Study.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Pedro Henrique Guimarães, Mário Borges Rosa, Adriano Max Moreira Reis, Kirla Barbosa Detoni, Gabriela de Paula Guimarães Rodrigues, Mariana Martins Gonzaga Nascimento
{"title":"Situational Analysis of the Medication Practices in Brazilian Hospitals: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Pedro Henrique Guimarães, Mário Borges Rosa, Adriano Max Moreira Reis, Kirla Barbosa Detoni, Gabriela de Paula Guimarães Rodrigues, Mariana Martins Gonzaga Nascimento","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To carry out a situational analysis of the medication practices in Brazilian hospitals through the Medication Safety Self-Assessment for Hospitals and the factors associated with better performance in the evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicenter cross-sectional study in which the results of the application of the Medication Safety Self-Assessment for Hospitals, between 2015 and 2020, in 30 Brazilian hospitals were described. In addition, whether the institutional profile was associated with higher self-assessment scores (better performance in the evaluation) was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An average proportion of points obtained of 36.7±10.9% was identified (minimum=11.5%; maximum=59.7%), from a score ranging from 0 to 1826 points. The need to improve the use of devices for the preparation and administration of drug solutions, professional development, and patient education was highlighted. A positive association was identified between higher scores and the large or very large size of the hospitals (P=0.026) and having accreditation certification (P=0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study made it possible to identify the main weak points and opportunities for improvement of the medication system in the evaluated hospitals, bringing important reflection to national institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To carry out a situational analysis of the medication practices in Brazilian hospitals through the Medication Safety Self-Assessment for Hospitals and the factors associated with better performance in the evaluation.

Methods: This is a multicenter cross-sectional study in which the results of the application of the Medication Safety Self-Assessment for Hospitals, between 2015 and 2020, in 30 Brazilian hospitals were described. In addition, whether the institutional profile was associated with higher self-assessment scores (better performance in the evaluation) was also evaluated.

Results: An average proportion of points obtained of 36.7±10.9% was identified (minimum=11.5%; maximum=59.7%), from a score ranging from 0 to 1826 points. The need to improve the use of devices for the preparation and administration of drug solutions, professional development, and patient education was highlighted. A positive association was identified between higher scores and the large or very large size of the hospitals (P=0.026) and having accreditation certification (P=0.007).

Conclusions: The study made it possible to identify the main weak points and opportunities for improvement of the medication system in the evaluated hospitals, bringing important reflection to national institutions.

巴西医院用药情况分析:一项多中心研究
目的:通过《医院用药安全自我评价》对巴西医院的用药实践进行情景分析,并分析评价中与较好绩效相关的因素。方法:这是一项多中心横断面研究,其中描述了2015年至2020年在30家巴西医院中应用医院用药安全自我评估的结果。此外,还评估了机构概况是否与更高的自我评估分数(评估中更好的表现)相关。结果:平均识别出36.7±10.9%的分值(最小=11.5%;最大值=59.7%),从0到1826分。强调需要改进设备的使用,以制备和管理药物溶液,专业发展和患者教育。得分越高,医院规模越大或越大(P=0.026),获得认可认证的医院越高(P=0.007)。结论:本研究发现了被评价医院用药制度的主要短板和改进机会,对国家机构具有重要的借鉴意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信