Leticia León-Quismondo, Alberto Fernández-Liria, Francisca López-Ríos, Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz, José M García-Montes, Ángela Ibáñez, Bryan J Stiles, Guillermo Lahera
{"title":"Predictors and Moderators of Panic Disorder: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.","authors":"Leticia León-Quismondo, Alberto Fernández-Liria, Francisca López-Ríos, Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz, José M García-Montes, Ángela Ibáñez, Bryan J Stiles, Guillermo Lahera","doi":"10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding variables that influence therapy outcomes can improve the results of interventions and reduce socio-health costs. The current study examined possible predictors and moderators of outcome (age, gender, duration of panic disorder, motivation to change, conscientiousness, and experiential avoidance) in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty participants with a diagnosis of panic disorder, 56 women and 24 men, with an average age of 38 years, received 12 group sessions of CBT or ACT. They were assessed with several measures at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CBT outperformed ACT among older subjects, men, and those with a shorter duration of panic disorder. ACT outperformed CBT among younger subjects, women, and those with a long duration of panic disorder. In general, the greatest improvements in both CBT and ACT were in older subjects, women, those with a long duration of panic disorder, those in the contemplation stage, and those with high experiential avoidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although future studies are necessary, there appear to be predictors and moderators of the effectiveness of CBT and ACT. Taking these variables into account can help improve treatment for people with panic disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":48179,"journal":{"name":"Psicothema","volume":"37 1","pages":"32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicothema","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.04","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Understanding variables that influence therapy outcomes can improve the results of interventions and reduce socio-health costs. The current study examined possible predictors and moderators of outcome (age, gender, duration of panic disorder, motivation to change, conscientiousness, and experiential avoidance) in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).
Method: Eighty participants with a diagnosis of panic disorder, 56 women and 24 men, with an average age of 38 years, received 12 group sessions of CBT or ACT. They were assessed with several measures at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up.
Results: CBT outperformed ACT among older subjects, men, and those with a shorter duration of panic disorder. ACT outperformed CBT among younger subjects, women, and those with a long duration of panic disorder. In general, the greatest improvements in both CBT and ACT were in older subjects, women, those with a long duration of panic disorder, those in the contemplation stage, and those with high experiential avoidance.
Conclusions: Although future studies are necessary, there appear to be predictors and moderators of the effectiveness of CBT and ACT. Taking these variables into account can help improve treatment for people with panic disorder.
期刊介绍:
La revista Psicothema fue fundada en Asturias en 1989 y está editada conjuntamente por la Facultad y el Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Oviedo y el Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias. Publica cuatro números al año. Se admiten trabajos tanto de investigación básica como aplicada, pertenecientes a cualquier ámbito de la Psicología, que previamente a su publicación son evaluados anónimamente por revisores externos. Psicothema está incluida en las bases de datos nacionales e internacionales más relevantes, entre las que cabe destacar Psychological Abstracts, Current Contents y MEDLINE/Index Medicus, entre otras. Además, figura en las listas de Factor de Impacto del Journal Citation Reports. Psicothema es una revista abierta a cualquier enfoque u orientación psicológica que venga avalada por la fuerza de los datos y los argumentos, y en la que encuentran acomodo todos los autores que sean capaces de convencer a los revisores de que sus manuscritos tienen la calidad para ser publicados. Psicothema es una revista de acceso abierto lo que significa que todo el contenido está a disposición de cualquier usuario o institución sin cargo alguno. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar, o realizar enlaces a los textos completos de esta revista sin pedir permiso previo al editor o al autor, siempre y cuando la fuente original sea referenciada. Para acervos y repositorios, se prefiere que la cobertura se realice mediante enlaces a la propia web de Psicothema. Nos parece que una apuesta decidida por la calidad es el mejor modo de servir a nuestros lectores, cuyas sugerencias siempre serán bienvenidas.