[Primary care physicians' perspectives on the referral of patients with social problems to non-medical services - a cross-sectional survey].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sinah Evers, Thomas Kloppe, Ansgar Gerhardus
{"title":"[Primary care physicians' perspectives on the referral of patients with social problems to non-medical services - a cross-sectional survey].","authors":"Sinah Evers, Thomas Kloppe, Ansgar Gerhardus","doi":"10.1055/a-2518-8609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physicians in primary care practices encounter social problems among their patients on a daily basis. Physicians can refer these patients to social services to improve their health and reduce pressure on the health care system. Open questions remain about how these referral practices are carried out and what areas have potential for improvement.An online survey with 21 closed or open-ended questions was conducted among primary care physicians (general practitioners and paediatricians) in Bremen, Germany. Data from closed questions were analysed for frequency distributions, while responses to open-ended questions were coded and interpreted using qualitative content analysis.Out of 580 primary care physicians in Bremen, 45 (8%) participated in the survey. Most of the respondents considered it important to be able to refer patients to support services outside the medical care system. Physicians referred a median of 10% of patients for whom they identified a need for social support. The most common reasons for not referring patients included a lack of knowledge about available services or the absence of such services, as well as time constraints. A total of 33 physicians (73%) reported feeling highly burdened when unable to refer patients. Furthermore, 34 respondents (76%) anticipated that a central contact point for social issues would greatly improve their job satisfaction. More general practitioners than paediatricians considered support services related to finances, unemployment, and housing to be important, while paediatricians were more open to providing external social support services in their own practices or using a \"Gesundheitskiosk\" (health kiosk).This is the first study to compare general practitioners and paediatricians regarding social issues in patient care. Given the low response rate, the results should be interpreted with caution. Notably, physicians reported that they did not refer most patients with identified social needs and experienced this as a burden. The majority indicated that, if available, they would use various forms of collaboration with social services.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2518-8609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physicians in primary care practices encounter social problems among their patients on a daily basis. Physicians can refer these patients to social services to improve their health and reduce pressure on the health care system. Open questions remain about how these referral practices are carried out and what areas have potential for improvement.An online survey with 21 closed or open-ended questions was conducted among primary care physicians (general practitioners and paediatricians) in Bremen, Germany. Data from closed questions were analysed for frequency distributions, while responses to open-ended questions were coded and interpreted using qualitative content analysis.Out of 580 primary care physicians in Bremen, 45 (8%) participated in the survey. Most of the respondents considered it important to be able to refer patients to support services outside the medical care system. Physicians referred a median of 10% of patients for whom they identified a need for social support. The most common reasons for not referring patients included a lack of knowledge about available services or the absence of such services, as well as time constraints. A total of 33 physicians (73%) reported feeling highly burdened when unable to refer patients. Furthermore, 34 respondents (76%) anticipated that a central contact point for social issues would greatly improve their job satisfaction. More general practitioners than paediatricians considered support services related to finances, unemployment, and housing to be important, while paediatricians were more open to providing external social support services in their own practices or using a "Gesundheitskiosk" (health kiosk).This is the first study to compare general practitioners and paediatricians regarding social issues in patient care. Given the low response rate, the results should be interpreted with caution. Notably, physicians reported that they did not refer most patients with identified social needs and experienced this as a burden. The majority indicated that, if available, they would use various forms of collaboration with social services.

儿科医生和家庭医生对将有社会问题的病人转介到非医疗服务的观点——横断调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信