Low back pain treatment adherence barriers in Eswatini private physiotherapy practices: A pilot study.

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION
South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v80i1.2077
Tapiwa Chikaka, Monique M Keller
{"title":"Low back pain treatment adherence barriers in Eswatini private physiotherapy practices: A pilot study.","authors":"Tapiwa Chikaka, Monique M Keller","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v80i1.2077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adherence to management regimes is pivotal to successfully managing patients with low back pain (LBP). Barriers decrease adherence, resulting in disability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our pilot study aimed to determine barriers associated with physiotherapy treatment attendance and home exercise programme adherence among patients with LBP and treating physiotherapists in Eswatini.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive pilot study using a self-developed Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) survey was conducted with 62 LBP patients. Descriptive, regression and bivariate statistical analyses with odds ratios (OR) were used to identify adherence barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two (35.5%) participants missed appointments because of feeling better. Twenty-one participants (33.9%) missed scheduled appointments due to painful sessions, cost and the burden of changing their routines. Home exercise adherence was positively associated with understanding the condition (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and negatively with too many exercises (<i>p</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified patient barriers to physiotherapy adherence, particularly females aged 40-69 years. Although doctor referrals improved adherence, time constraints and pain remained significant barriers. Barriers to prescribed home exercise programme adherence included pain during exercises, fear, no time, forgetting/no reference and too many exercises. While most participants understood their condition, some lacked understanding, underscoring the need for better education. Addressing these barriers could enhance adherence and reduce the impact of LBP.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>To overcome the barrier of adherence to keeping appointments, prioritising health education and providing reasons for exercises should be empathised. Exercise programme adherence could be improved by providing reference material, less and more meaningful and/or functional exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"80 1","pages":"2077"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v80i1.2077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adherence to management regimes is pivotal to successfully managing patients with low back pain (LBP). Barriers decrease adherence, resulting in disability.

Objectives: Our pilot study aimed to determine barriers associated with physiotherapy treatment attendance and home exercise programme adherence among patients with LBP and treating physiotherapists in Eswatini.

Method: A cross-sectional descriptive pilot study using a self-developed Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) survey was conducted with 62 LBP patients. Descriptive, regression and bivariate statistical analyses with odds ratios (OR) were used to identify adherence barriers.

Results: Twenty-two (35.5%) participants missed appointments because of feeling better. Twenty-one participants (33.9%) missed scheduled appointments due to painful sessions, cost and the burden of changing their routines. Home exercise adherence was positively associated with understanding the condition (p = 0.001) and negatively with too many exercises (p = 0.005).

Conclusion: Our study identified patient barriers to physiotherapy adherence, particularly females aged 40-69 years. Although doctor referrals improved adherence, time constraints and pain remained significant barriers. Barriers to prescribed home exercise programme adherence included pain during exercises, fear, no time, forgetting/no reference and too many exercises. While most participants understood their condition, some lacked understanding, underscoring the need for better education. Addressing these barriers could enhance adherence and reduce the impact of LBP.

Clinical implications: To overcome the barrier of adherence to keeping appointments, prioritising health education and providing reasons for exercises should be empathised. Exercise programme adherence could be improved by providing reference material, less and more meaningful and/or functional exercises.

斯瓦蒂尼私人物理治疗实践中的腰痛治疗依从性障碍:一项试点研究。
背景:坚持管理制度是成功管理腰痛(LBP)患者的关键。障碍降低了依从性,导致残疾。目的:我们的试点研究旨在确定与Eswatini LBP患者和治疗物理治疗师的物理治疗出诊率和家庭运动计划依从性相关的障碍。方法:采用自行开发的研究电子数据采集(REDCap)调查对62例LBP患者进行横断面描述性初步研究。采用比值比(OR)的描述性、回归和双变量统计分析来确定依从性障碍。结果:22人(35.5%)因感觉好转而错过预约。21名参与者(33.9%)由于痛苦的治疗、费用和改变常规的负担而错过了预定的预约。家庭运动依从性与了解病情呈正相关(p = 0.001),与运动过多呈负相关(p = 0.005)。结论:我们的研究确定了患者坚持物理治疗的障碍,特别是40-69岁的女性。虽然医生转诊改善了依从性,但时间限制和疼痛仍然是重大障碍。遵守规定的家庭运动计划的障碍包括运动期间的疼痛、恐惧、没有时间、忘记/没有参考和太多的运动。虽然大多数参与者了解他们的情况,但有些人缺乏了解,强调需要更好的教育。解决这些障碍可以提高依从性并减少腰痛的影响。临床意义:为了克服坚持预约的障碍,应该优先考虑健康教育和提供锻炼的理由。通过提供参考材料、更少和更有意义和/或功能性锻炼,可以提高锻炼计划的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信