Enhanced pathogen identification among patients with clinically suspected meningitis.

IF 1.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajid.v39i1.688
Malefu Moleleki, Pieter Nel, Siphiwe R Matukane, Stephanie Cloete, Zayaan Abrahams, Nicole Wolter, Andrew C Whitelaw
{"title":"Enhanced pathogen identification among patients with clinically suspected meningitis.","authors":"Malefu Moleleki, Pieter Nel, Siphiwe R Matukane, Stephanie Cloete, Zayaan Abrahams, Nicole Wolter, Andrew C Whitelaw","doi":"10.4102/sajid.v39i1.688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed or incorrect treatment of meningitis may result in adverse patient outcomes. However, laboratory testing in resource-limited settings is often limited to conventional diagnostic methods. We explored the utility of syndromic molecular assays for diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We tested cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens collected from patients with clinically suspected meningitis submitted to a tertiary hospital laboratory in January 2021 - May 2021. Primary microbiological analysis (culture, Gram stain and cytochemical analysis) was performed as part of routine testing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Residual CSF specimens were tested using a bacterial triplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay and a syndromic multi-pathogen real-time PCR assay for the detection of up to 18 bacterial and viral pathogens. Pathogen detection was compared between conventional and molecular assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A potential pathogen was detected in 6% (12/188) and 47% (89/188) of specimens on the triplex and the multi-pathogen assay, respectively. Epstein-Barr virus (49/188; 26%), human herpes virus 7 (22/188; 12%), herpes simplex virus 1 (13/188; 7%) and <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> (10/188; 5%) were the leading pathogens detected on the syndromic multi-pathogen PCR. Further, using the multi-pathogen PCR assay, a potential pathogen was detected in 44% (73/166) of the specimens which were negative following routine testing. Overall, combining routine testing and molecular platforms significantly improved pathogen detection (<i>p</i> < 0.001); a potential pathogen was identified in 51% (95/188) of the specimens tested, compared to 12% (22/188) using routine methods alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of molecular tests improved pathogen detection by 39% when paired with routine methods.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Multi-pathogen molecular testing is useful for rapidly diagnosing meningitis cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":44007,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"39 1","pages":"688"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v39i1.688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delayed or incorrect treatment of meningitis may result in adverse patient outcomes. However, laboratory testing in resource-limited settings is often limited to conventional diagnostic methods. We explored the utility of syndromic molecular assays for diagnosis.

Objectives: We tested cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens collected from patients with clinically suspected meningitis submitted to a tertiary hospital laboratory in January 2021 - May 2021. Primary microbiological analysis (culture, Gram stain and cytochemical analysis) was performed as part of routine testing.

Method: Residual CSF specimens were tested using a bacterial triplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay and a syndromic multi-pathogen real-time PCR assay for the detection of up to 18 bacterial and viral pathogens. Pathogen detection was compared between conventional and molecular assays.

Results: A potential pathogen was detected in 6% (12/188) and 47% (89/188) of specimens on the triplex and the multi-pathogen assay, respectively. Epstein-Barr virus (49/188; 26%), human herpes virus 7 (22/188; 12%), herpes simplex virus 1 (13/188; 7%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (10/188; 5%) were the leading pathogens detected on the syndromic multi-pathogen PCR. Further, using the multi-pathogen PCR assay, a potential pathogen was detected in 44% (73/166) of the specimens which were negative following routine testing. Overall, combining routine testing and molecular platforms significantly improved pathogen detection (p < 0.001); a potential pathogen was identified in 51% (95/188) of the specimens tested, compared to 12% (22/188) using routine methods alone.

Conclusion: The use of molecular tests improved pathogen detection by 39% when paired with routine methods.

Contribution: Multi-pathogen molecular testing is useful for rapidly diagnosing meningitis cases.

加强临床疑似脑膜炎患者的病原体鉴定。
背景:延迟或不正确的脑膜炎治疗可能导致不良的患者预后。然而,在资源有限的情况下,实验室检测往往仅限于传统的诊断方法。我们探讨了综合征分子检测诊断的效用。目的:我们检测了从2021年1月至2021年5月提交给三级医院实验室的临床疑似脑膜炎患者收集的脑脊液(CSF)标本。初级微生物分析(培养、革兰氏染色和细胞化学分析)作为常规检测的一部分进行。方法:采用细菌三重实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)法和综合征多病原体实时PCR法检测残留脑脊液标本,检测多达18种细菌和病毒病原体。比较了常规检测与分子检测的病原菌检测结果。结果:三联法和多联法检出潜在病原菌的比例分别为6%(12/188)和47%(89/188)。爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(49/188;26%),人类疱疹病毒7 (22/188;12%),单纯疱疹病毒1型(13/188;7%)和肺炎链球菌(10/188;5%)为证型多致病菌PCR检出的主要致病菌。常规检测阴性的标本中,有44%(73/166)检出潜在病原菌。总体而言,常规检测与分子平台结合可显著提高病原体检出率(p < 0.001);51%(95/188)的检测标本中发现潜在病原体,而单独使用常规方法的检测标本为12%(22/188)。结论:分子检测与常规方法配合使用,病原菌检出率提高39%。贡献:多病原体分子检测有助于快速诊断脑膜炎病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信