Implications of Diminishing Lifespan Marginal Utility for Valuing Equity in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683241305106
R Scott Braithwaite
{"title":"Implications of Diminishing Lifespan Marginal Utility for Valuing Equity in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.","authors":"R Scott Braithwaite","doi":"10.1177/23814683241305106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Diminishing marginal lifespan utility (DMLU) implies that a particular lifespan increment (e.g., 1 life-year) confers lesser marginal utility if added to longer lifespans (e.g., 90 y to 91 y) than to shorter lifespans (e.g., 60 y to 61 y) if quality of life is unchanged. Because DMLU is difficult to disambiguate from discounting, risk attitude, and other elements of utility \"curvature,\" it is poorly characterized. However, the imperative to consider equity in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) renders its characterization more important. <b>Methods.</b> I add certainty to the characterization of DMLU through literature review and illustrative example. The literature review synthesizes stated preference studies of utility curvature that exclude risk or probability. The example compares alternative valuations of approaches to reduce inequality in cystic fibrosis outcomes between US centers serving mostly White patients and centers serving mostly non-Black Hispanic patients, with versus without DMLU. <b>Results.</b> The existence of DMLU is likely, and empirical data support its relevance over typical CEA time horizons. The imperative to consider equity in CEA magnifies the importance of DMLU for several reasons. First, intergenerational CEAs require lower discount rates that are less likely to incidentally absorb DMLU. Second, DMLU is incompatible with the use of absolute measures of inequality aversion. Third, DMLU may bias the interpretation of relative measures of inequality aversion toward prioritarianism. Finally, not considering DMLU implicitly biases life-year-based metrics against equity. <b>Conclusion.</b> DMLU is likely to exist, can benefit from additional characterization, and may merit inclusion in CEA alongside discounting. Omitting consideration of DMLU will sometimes confer an antiequity bias and may affect the interpretation of CEAs incorporating inequality aversion.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Diminishing marginal lifespan utility (DMLU) means that the value of extending lifespan may differ based on the duration of life already lived.DMLU is not typically considered in cost-effectiveness analyses.Not considering DMLU may bias cost-effectiveness analyses against equity.Not considering DMLU may reduce the accuracy of distributive cost-effectiveness analyses and other approaches to consider equity along with efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"23814683241305106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683241305106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Diminishing marginal lifespan utility (DMLU) implies that a particular lifespan increment (e.g., 1 life-year) confers lesser marginal utility if added to longer lifespans (e.g., 90 y to 91 y) than to shorter lifespans (e.g., 60 y to 61 y) if quality of life is unchanged. Because DMLU is difficult to disambiguate from discounting, risk attitude, and other elements of utility "curvature," it is poorly characterized. However, the imperative to consider equity in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) renders its characterization more important. Methods. I add certainty to the characterization of DMLU through literature review and illustrative example. The literature review synthesizes stated preference studies of utility curvature that exclude risk or probability. The example compares alternative valuations of approaches to reduce inequality in cystic fibrosis outcomes between US centers serving mostly White patients and centers serving mostly non-Black Hispanic patients, with versus without DMLU. Results. The existence of DMLU is likely, and empirical data support its relevance over typical CEA time horizons. The imperative to consider equity in CEA magnifies the importance of DMLU for several reasons. First, intergenerational CEAs require lower discount rates that are less likely to incidentally absorb DMLU. Second, DMLU is incompatible with the use of absolute measures of inequality aversion. Third, DMLU may bias the interpretation of relative measures of inequality aversion toward prioritarianism. Finally, not considering DMLU implicitly biases life-year-based metrics against equity. Conclusion. DMLU is likely to exist, can benefit from additional characterization, and may merit inclusion in CEA alongside discounting. Omitting consideration of DMLU will sometimes confer an antiequity bias and may affect the interpretation of CEAs incorporating inequality aversion.

Highlights: Diminishing marginal lifespan utility (DMLU) means that the value of extending lifespan may differ based on the duration of life already lived.DMLU is not typically considered in cost-effectiveness analyses.Not considering DMLU may bias cost-effectiveness analyses against equity.Not considering DMLU may reduce the accuracy of distributive cost-effectiveness analyses and other approaches to consider equity along with efficiency.

寿命边际效用递减对成本效益分析中权益评估的影响。
介绍。边际寿命效用递减(DMLU)意味着,在生活质量不变的情况下,一个特定的寿命增量(例如,1个生命年)如果增加到较长的寿命(例如,90岁至91岁)中,其边际效用要小于增加到较短的寿命(例如,60岁至61岁)中。因为DMLU很难从贴现、风险态度和其他效用“曲率”元素中消除歧义,所以它的特征很差。然而,在成本效益分析(CEA)中考虑公平性的必要性使得其表征更加重要。方法。我通过文献综述和举例说明来增加对DMLU特征的确定性。文献综述综合了排除风险或概率的效用曲率的陈述偏好研究。本例比较了在美国主要为白人患者服务的中心和主要为非黑人西班牙裔患者服务的中心之间,在有和没有DMLU的情况下,减少囊性纤维化结果不平等的方法的不同估值。结果。DMLU的存在是可能的,并且经验数据支持其在典型CEA时间范围内的相关性。考虑CEA公平性的必要性放大了DMLU的重要性,原因有几个。首先,代际cea需要较低的贴现率,从而不太可能偶然吸收DMLU。其次,DMLU与使用厌恶不平等的绝对衡量标准是不相容的。第三,DMLU可能会使对不平等厌恶的相对衡量标准的解释偏向优先主义。最后,不考虑DMLU会使基于生命周期的指标与公平相冲突。结论。DMLU可能存在,可以从额外的表征中受益,并且可能值得将其包含在CEA中并进行折扣。忽略对DMLU的考虑有时会产生反公平偏见,并可能影响对包含不平等厌恶的cea的解释。重点:边际寿命效用递减(DMLU)意味着延长寿命的价值可能会根据已经活过的生命的持续时间而有所不同。在成本效益分析中通常不考虑DMLU。不考虑DMLU可能会使成本效益分析偏向于公平。不考虑DMLU可能会降低分配成本效益分析和其他考虑公平和效率的方法的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信