Diabetes complications in people with alcohol use disorder and type 2 diabetes.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-06-03 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0133
Sarah Cook, Sonia Saxena, Rohini Mathur, Thomas Beaney, Shamini Gnani, Ana Luisa Neves, Arti Maini, Ravi Parekh, Kate Walters, David Osborn, Jennifer K Quint
{"title":"Diabetes complications in people with alcohol use disorder and type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Sarah Cook, Sonia Saxena, Rohini Mathur, Thomas Beaney, Shamini Gnani, Ana Luisa Neves, Arti Maini, Ravi Parekh, Kate Walters, David Osborn, Jennifer K Quint","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People living with alcohol use disorder (AUD) who develop type 2 diabetes (T2DM) may be at higher risk of diabetes complications.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our aim was to compare diabetes monitoring and incidence of diabetes complications between people with and without AUD prior to T2DM diagnosis attending primary care in England.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>We used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics mortality data. The target population was people with incident T2DM diagnosed between 2004 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We defined AUD from codes indicating i) clinical diagnosis; ii) alcohol withdrawal; or iii) chronic alcohol-related harm. Outcomes were end-stage renal disease (ESRD), lower limb amputation, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, and all-cause mortality. We compared yearly HbA1c, creatinine, and cholesterol monitoring activities for the first 5 years post T2DM diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population was 543 509 people, of whom 15 237 (2.8%) had a code for AUD. Adjusting for measured confounders, people with AUD had higher rates of ESRD ( incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.95, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.71 to 2.23), lower limb amputation (IRR 1.78, 95% CI = 1.50 to 2.21), stroke (IRR 1.36, 95% CI = 1.25 to 1.47), CVD mortality (IRR 1.74, 95% CI = 1.63 to 1.86), and all-cause mortality (IRR 2.10, 95% CI = 2.04 to 2.17) but not MI (IRR 0.91, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.00) compared with people without AUD. Laboratory diabetes monitoring was high in people with (83.5-91.1%) and without (83.7-92.4%) AUD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People with AUD had nearly double the rates of most of the diabetes complications investigated compared with people without AUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People living with alcohol use disorder (AUD) who develop type 2 diabetes (T2DM) may be at higher risk of diabetes complications.

Aim: Our aim was to compare diabetes monitoring and incidence of diabetes complications between people with and without AUD prior to T2DM diagnosis attending primary care in England.

Design & setting: We used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics mortality data. The target population was people with incident T2DM diagnosed between 2004 and 2019.

Method: We defined AUD from codes indicating i) clinical diagnosis; ii) alcohol withdrawal; or iii) chronic alcohol-related harm. Outcomes were end-stage renal disease (ESRD), lower limb amputation, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, and all-cause mortality. We compared yearly HbA1c, creatinine, and cholesterol monitoring activities for the first 5 years post T2DM diagnosis.

Results: The study population was 543 509 people, of whom 15 237 (2.8%) had a code for AUD. Adjusting for measured confounders, people with AUD had higher rates of ESRD ( incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.95, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.71 to 2.23), lower limb amputation (IRR 1.78, 95% CI = 1.50 to 2.21), stroke (IRR 1.36, 95% CI = 1.25 to 1.47), CVD mortality (IRR 1.74, 95% CI = 1.63 to 1.86), and all-cause mortality (IRR 2.10, 95% CI = 2.04 to 2.17) but not MI (IRR 0.91, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.00) compared with people without AUD. Laboratory diabetes monitoring was high in people with (83.5-91.1%) and without (83.7-92.4%) AUD.

Conclusion: People with AUD had nearly double the rates of most of the diabetes complications investigated compared with people without AUD.

酒精使用障碍和2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病并发症。
背景:患有酒精使用障碍(AUD)的人发展为2型糖尿病(T2DM)可能有更高的糖尿病并发症风险。目的:我们的目的是比较在英国接受初级保健的诊断为2型糖尿病的患者和非AUD患者之间的糖尿病监测和糖尿病并发症发生率。设计和设置:我们使用临床实践研究数据链(CPRD) Aurum与医院事件统计(HES)和国家统计局(ONS)死亡率数据相关联。目标人群是2004-2019年间诊断为T2DM的患者。方法:我们从以下代码定义AUD: 1)临床诊断;Ii)戒酒;或iii)慢性酒精相关伤害。结果是终末期肾病(ESRD)、下肢截肢、心肌梗死(MI)、中风、心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率和全因死亡率。我们比较了T2DM诊断后前5年的年度HbA1c、肌酐和胆固醇监测活动。结果:研究人群为543,509人,其中15237人(2.8%)有AUD代码。调整测量的混杂因素,与没有AUD的人相比,AUD患者的ESRD (IRR 1.95 95% CI 1.71, 2.23)、下肢截肢(IRR 1.78 95% CI 1.50, 2.21)、中风(IRR 1.35 95% CI 1.25, 1.46)、心血管疾病死亡率(IRR 1.74 95% CI 1.63, 1.86)和全因死亡率(IRR 2.10 95% CI 2.04, 2.17)的发生率更高,但MI (IRR 0.91 95% CI 0.82, 1.00)的发生率不高。AUD患者(83.5-91.1%)和非AUD患者(83.7-92.4%)的实验室糖尿病监测水平较高。结论:AUD患者的大多数糖尿病并发症发生率几乎是无AUD患者的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信