{"title":"Real-time ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural placement: Illustrating the techniques and reporting on prospective observational study.","authors":"Karuna Sutthibenjakul, Jatuporn Pakpirom, Sirikarn Siripruekpong, Somrutai Boonchuduang","doi":"10.1177/17504589241302221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the feasibility of real-time ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in 20 patients undergoing elective abdominal and thoracic surgery. The procedure, performed with patients in a lateral position, involved three sequential steps: (1) identification of the interlaminar gap, (2) advancement of the Touhy needle, and (3) identification of the epidural space. Success was defined as the catheter insertion with achieving sensory blockade. The estimated and actual epidural depth, thoracic epidural placement success rate and procedural time were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age and body mass index were 62.1 ± 8.9 years and 22.4 ± 4.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Thoracic epidural placement was successful in 18 patients (90%, 95% confidence interval: 77-100), and at first attempt in 12 of those (66.7%). The thoracic epidural placement times and total procedural time were 5 (4-6.75) min and 19.5 ± 5.4 min, respectively. The correlation between ultrasound-estimated epidural depth and actual depth was 0.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound guidance enhances thoracic epidural success rates and reduces attempts and skin punctures.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589241302221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241302221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of real-time ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural placement.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in 20 patients undergoing elective abdominal and thoracic surgery. The procedure, performed with patients in a lateral position, involved three sequential steps: (1) identification of the interlaminar gap, (2) advancement of the Touhy needle, and (3) identification of the epidural space. Success was defined as the catheter insertion with achieving sensory blockade. The estimated and actual epidural depth, thoracic epidural placement success rate and procedural time were recorded.
Results: The average age and body mass index were 62.1 ± 8.9 years and 22.4 ± 4.4 kg/m2. Thoracic epidural placement was successful in 18 patients (90%, 95% confidence interval: 77-100), and at first attempt in 12 of those (66.7%). The thoracic epidural placement times and total procedural time were 5 (4-6.75) min and 19.5 ± 5.4 min, respectively. The correlation between ultrasound-estimated epidural depth and actual depth was 0.81.
Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance enhances thoracic epidural success rates and reduces attempts and skin punctures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.