[Exploring the voice of patients: Mapping their experience following care in an integrated health area].

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
J López-Picazo Ferrer, J M Marín Martínez, I Vidal-Abarca Gutiérrez, M López Ibáñez
{"title":"[Exploring the voice of patients: Mapping their experience following care in an integrated health area].","authors":"J López-Picazo Ferrer, J M Marín Martínez, I Vidal-Abarca Gutiérrez, M López Ibáñez","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Measuring patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) is essential for the continuous improvement of quality. This study aims to assess the quality perceived by patients in the key care processes of an integrated health area measuring PREM elements, with the goal of identifying opportunities for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted in the first half of 2023 within a Spanish integrated health area, analysing five key healthcare processes: Primary Care, Emergency Services, Hospitalisation, Consultations, and Surgery. To assess perceived quality, PREM elements such as accessibility, information, and professionalism were measured using the Net Promoter Score (NPS). The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) method was employed to identify specific areas for improvement by detecting rejected lots and optimising sample sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the perceived quality was generally high, with good or excellent NPS scores, significant variability was observed between processes. A total of 104 rejected lots (21%) were identified across the processes evaluated. The highest number of rejections occurred in and Emergency Services (67%), with notable issues in accessibility and information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the need for targeted interventions in accessibility and information to enhance the patient experience, particularly in Primary Care and Emergency Services. The measurement of PREM elements using NPS, in conjunction with the LQAS method, proves to be an effective tool for identifying and prioritising areas for improvement, especially when applied on a regular basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.12.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Measuring patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) is essential for the continuous improvement of quality. This study aims to assess the quality perceived by patients in the key care processes of an integrated health area measuring PREM elements, with the goal of identifying opportunities for improvement.

Methods: The research was conducted in the first half of 2023 within a Spanish integrated health area, analysing five key healthcare processes: Primary Care, Emergency Services, Hospitalisation, Consultations, and Surgery. To assess perceived quality, PREM elements such as accessibility, information, and professionalism were measured using the Net Promoter Score (NPS). The Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) method was employed to identify specific areas for improvement by detecting rejected lots and optimising sample sizes.

Results: Although the perceived quality was generally high, with good or excellent NPS scores, significant variability was observed between processes. A total of 104 rejected lots (21%) were identified across the processes evaluated. The highest number of rejections occurred in and Emergency Services (67%), with notable issues in accessibility and information.

Conclusions: The study underscores the need for targeted interventions in accessibility and information to enhance the patient experience, particularly in Primary Care and Emergency Services. The measurement of PREM elements using NPS, in conjunction with the LQAS method, proves to be an effective tool for identifying and prioritising areas for improvement, especially when applied on a regular basis.

[探索病人的声音:绘制他们在综合健康领域护理后的经历]。
背景与目的:测量患者报告体验测量(PREMs)对于持续提高质量至关重要。本研究旨在评估病患在综合医疗领域的关键照护过程中所感受到的品质,以找出改善的机会。方法:该研究于2023年上半年在西班牙综合卫生领域进行,分析了五个关键的卫生保健流程:初级保健、紧急服务、住院、咨询和手术。为了评估感知质量,使用净推荐值(NPS)来测量PREM元素,如可访问性、信息和专业性。采用批次质量保证抽样(LQAS)方法,通过检测拒收批次和优化样本量来确定需要改进的特定区域。结果:虽然感知质量普遍较高,具有良好或优秀的NPS评分,但在过程之间观察到显著的差异。在整个评估过程中,共有104个不合格批次(21%)被确定。拒绝人数最多的是急救服务部门(67%),在可及性和信息方面存在明显问题。结论:该研究强调需要在可及性和信息方面采取有针对性的干预措施,以改善患者体验,特别是在初级保健和急诊服务方面。使用NPS测量PREM元素,结合LQAS方法,证明是识别和优先考虑需要改进的领域的有效工具,特别是在定期应用时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信