Risk-Adapted Letermovir Prophylaxis Based on a Scoring System Predicting a Higher Burden of Cytomegalovirus Exposure After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
{"title":"Risk-Adapted Letermovir Prophylaxis Based on a Scoring System Predicting a Higher Burden of Cytomegalovirus Exposure After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.","authors":"Shunto Kawamura, Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara, Shun-Ichi Kimura, Junko Takeshita, Hideki Nakasone, Kazuki Yoshimura, Yuya Nakata, Takuto Ishikawa, Akari Matsuoka, Tomohiro Meno, Yuhei Nakamura, Masakatsu Kawamura, Nozomu Yoshino, Yukiko Misaki, Ayumi Gomyo, Machiko Kusuda, Rui Murahashi, Kento Umino, Daisuke Minakata, Masahiro Ashizawa, Chihiro Yamamoto, Kaoru Hatano, Kazuya Sato, Ken Ohmine, Shinichi Kako, Yoshinobu Kanda","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2025.01.883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We previously reported that the area under the curve of log-transformed cytomegalovirus antigenemia (CMV-AUC) until 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) was associated with an increased risk of non-relapse mortality. We applied a risk-adapted letermovir (LTV) prophylaxis strategy guided by a risk score that predicts a higher CMV-AUC. First, we retrospectively analyzed 278 allo-HCT recipients between 2007 and 2017 (Period 1). We scored risk factors for higher CMV-AUC by odds ratios: malignant lymphoma including adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (1 point), an unrelated or haploidentical donor (1 point), and recipient/donor CMV serostatus (+/+; 2 points, +/-; 3 points). We have administered LTV to patients with a total score of ≥ 4 points. We then focused on 143 patients who underwent allo-HCT when we applied this strategy (Period 2). Forty patients (28%) in Period 2 received LTV prophylaxis. Two patients (5.4%) exhibited higher CMV-AUC among 37 patients in the higher-risk group (≥ 4 points). However, as many as 33% of the patients with 3 points in Period 2 experienced higher CMV-AUC. Notably, in the lower-risk patients of Period 2, 68% of patients who received systemic steroids for acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) developed higher CMV-AUC. Our risk-adapted LTV prophylaxis strategy effectively prevented higher CMV-AUC in the higher-risk group and reduced the use of LTV. Additionally, including the use of systemic steroids for acute GVHD in this risk-adapted approach is preferable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2025.01.883","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We previously reported that the area under the curve of log-transformed cytomegalovirus antigenemia (CMV-AUC) until 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) was associated with an increased risk of non-relapse mortality. We applied a risk-adapted letermovir (LTV) prophylaxis strategy guided by a risk score that predicts a higher CMV-AUC. First, we retrospectively analyzed 278 allo-HCT recipients between 2007 and 2017 (Period 1). We scored risk factors for higher CMV-AUC by odds ratios: malignant lymphoma including adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (1 point), an unrelated or haploidentical donor (1 point), and recipient/donor CMV serostatus (+/+; 2 points, +/-; 3 points). We have administered LTV to patients with a total score of ≥ 4 points. We then focused on 143 patients who underwent allo-HCT when we applied this strategy (Period 2). Forty patients (28%) in Period 2 received LTV prophylaxis. Two patients (5.4%) exhibited higher CMV-AUC among 37 patients in the higher-risk group (≥ 4 points). However, as many as 33% of the patients with 3 points in Period 2 experienced higher CMV-AUC. Notably, in the lower-risk patients of Period 2, 68% of patients who received systemic steroids for acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) developed higher CMV-AUC. Our risk-adapted LTV prophylaxis strategy effectively prevented higher CMV-AUC in the higher-risk group and reduced the use of LTV. Additionally, including the use of systemic steroids for acute GVHD in this risk-adapted approach is preferable.