Developing generic clinical trial animated explainer videos in the UK: results of a survey and case study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08687-5
Clare Calvert, Vicki S Barber, Duncan Appelbe, Kirsty Sprange, Claire Nollett, Fiona Lugg-Widger, Samantha Tanner, Duncan B Richards
{"title":"Developing generic clinical trial animated explainer videos in the UK: results of a survey and case study.","authors":"Clare Calvert, Vicki S Barber, Duncan Appelbe, Kirsty Sprange, Claire Nollett, Fiona Lugg-Widger, Samantha Tanner, Duncan B Richards","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08687-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Animated short videos used to explain a concept or project are often called animated explainer videos (AEVs). AEVs can supplement or provide an alternative to participant information sheets as a means of giving information about clinical research to potential participants. Current use of AEVs tends to focus on the specifics of a particular trial, yet there are many common aspects of clinical research regardless of the interventions being investigated that can be poorly covered in current trial materials. The EXPLAIN initiative aimed to determine the top generic clinical trial topics considered most important by different UK trial stakeholders. The top three topics were then turned into AEVs and have been made freely available for use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A list of generic clinical trial topics which often need explaining to potential trial participants when they are approached to take part in research was developed. Using a two-round Delphi survey of stakeholder groups (trial participants, patients, members of the public, site staff and clinical trials unit staff), the list of topics was expanded and prioritised to identify the topics most in need of clear explanation. The top three topics formed the basis of three AEVs, co-developed with patient and public partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred twenty-eight responses were received to the first round of the Delphi survey, and 167 of these respondents also completed the second round of the survey. The three topics prioritised for creation of animated explainer videos were as follows: (1) What is consent? (2) Who decides what treatment I get/What is randomisation? (3) Is it safe to take part in a trial/How do you know a trial is safe? Following virtual meetings with patient and public partners recruited from the Delphi respondents, a script for each AEV was co-produced before being developed into an AEV by a company specialising in animated video production.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are a wide range of generic concepts in which the use of animated explainer videos could be useful to improve participant understanding of clinical research. Via consensus survey across multiple stakeholders, we have determined a hierarchy of the importance of explaining these concepts. We envisage that the three AEVs created from this project will form the basis of a readily accessible library of animations to be utilised by trialists.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08687-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Animated short videos used to explain a concept or project are often called animated explainer videos (AEVs). AEVs can supplement or provide an alternative to participant information sheets as a means of giving information about clinical research to potential participants. Current use of AEVs tends to focus on the specifics of a particular trial, yet there are many common aspects of clinical research regardless of the interventions being investigated that can be poorly covered in current trial materials. The EXPLAIN initiative aimed to determine the top generic clinical trial topics considered most important by different UK trial stakeholders. The top three topics were then turned into AEVs and have been made freely available for use.

Method: A list of generic clinical trial topics which often need explaining to potential trial participants when they are approached to take part in research was developed. Using a two-round Delphi survey of stakeholder groups (trial participants, patients, members of the public, site staff and clinical trials unit staff), the list of topics was expanded and prioritised to identify the topics most in need of clear explanation. The top three topics formed the basis of three AEVs, co-developed with patient and public partners.

Results: Two hundred twenty-eight responses were received to the first round of the Delphi survey, and 167 of these respondents also completed the second round of the survey. The three topics prioritised for creation of animated explainer videos were as follows: (1) What is consent? (2) Who decides what treatment I get/What is randomisation? (3) Is it safe to take part in a trial/How do you know a trial is safe? Following virtual meetings with patient and public partners recruited from the Delphi respondents, a script for each AEV was co-produced before being developed into an AEV by a company specialising in animated video production.

Conclusion: There are a wide range of generic concepts in which the use of animated explainer videos could be useful to improve participant understanding of clinical research. Via consensus survey across multiple stakeholders, we have determined a hierarchy of the importance of explaining these concepts. We envisage that the three AEVs created from this project will form the basis of a readily accessible library of animations to be utilised by trialists.

在英国开发通用临床试验动画解释器视频:调查和案例研究的结果。
背景:用于解释概念或项目的动画短视频通常被称为动画解释视频(AEVs)。aev可以补充或提供参与者信息表的替代方法,作为向潜在参与者提供临床研究信息的一种手段。目前aev的使用往往侧重于特定试验的细节,然而,无论正在调查的干预措施如何,临床研究的许多共同方面在当前的试验材料中可能很少涵盖。EXPLAIN计划旨在确定不同英国试验利益相关者认为最重要的顶级通用临床试验主题。排名前三的主题随后被转化为aev,并免费提供使用。方法:制定了一份通用临床试验主题清单,这些主题通常需要在接近潜在试验参与者参加研究时向他们解释。通过对利益相关者群体(试验参与者、患者、公众成员、现场工作人员和临床试验单位工作人员)进行两轮德尔菲调查,扩大了主题列表并确定了优先顺序,以确定最需要明确解释的主题。前三个主题构成了与患者和公共伙伴共同开发的三个aev的基础。结果:第一轮德尔菲调查共收到228份回复,其中167份还完成了第二轮调查。制作动画解说视频的三个优先主题是:(1)什么是同意?(2)谁决定我接受何种治疗/什么是随机化?(3)参加试验安全吗/你怎么知道试验是安全的?在与从德尔福受访者中招募的患者和公共合作伙伴进行虚拟会议后,在由专门从事动画视频制作的公司开发成AEV之前,共同制作每个AEV的脚本。结论:有广泛的通用概念,其中使用动画讲解视频可能有助于提高参与者对临床研究的理解。通过对多个利益相关者的共识调查,我们确定了解释这些概念的重要性的层次结构。我们设想从这个项目中创建的三个aev将形成一个可供试用者使用的易于访问的动画库的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信