Anesthetics change the oral microbial composition of children and increase the abundance of the genus Haemophilus.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Translational pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.21037/tp-24-336
Dandan Xie, Nan Zhang, Yipeng Hu, Qiang Li, Yunfei Yang, Yingping Zou, Yanxiang Lu, Wei Hu, Lian Guo, Hong Li
{"title":"Anesthetics change the oral microbial composition of children and increase the abundance of the genus <i>Haemophilus</i>.","authors":"Dandan Xie, Nan Zhang, Yipeng Hu, Qiang Li, Yunfei Yang, Yingping Zou, Yanxiang Lu, Wei Hu, Lian Guo, Hong Li","doi":"10.21037/tp-24-336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral microbiome homeostasis is important for children's health, and microbial community is affected by anesthetics. The application of anesthetics in children's oral therapy has become a relatively mature method. This study aims to investigate the effect of different anesthesia techniques on children's oral microbiota.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty children who visited the Department of Stomatology of the Jiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital were recruited. Subjects who did not receive anesthesia during the surgery were divided into non-anesthesia (Noa) group. Other children who accepted anesthesia during the surgery were grouped into lidocaine group, sevoflurane group, and intravenous injection-inhalation (intra-inhalation) group. Subsequently, their saliva samples were collected for 16S rDNA sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,316 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified in overall samples, and 75,275 reads per sample were obtained on average. There were 137 genera were shared among the Noa, lidocaine, sevoflurane, and intra-inhalation groups. The genera <i>Neisseria</i>, <i>Prevotella-7, Streptococcus</i>, and <i>Veillonella</i> had a higher abundance in the four groups. Compared to the Noa group, anesthetics increased the abundance of the genus <i>Haemophilus</i> in the anesthesia groups. Alpha and beta diversity analyses revealed significant differences in the comparisons of Noa <i>vs.</i> sevoflurane and Noa <i>vs.</i> intra-inhalation. In contrast, the difference between the lidocaine and the Noa groups was slight. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analyses identified 52, 16, and 37 differential microbes in the Noa <i>vs.</i> sevoflurane, Noa <i>vs.</i> lidocaine, and Noa <i>vs.</i> intra-inhalation comparisons, respectively. Notably, <i>Haemophilus</i> genus was significantly enriched in the sevoflurane group compared to the Noa group. When comparing the Noa group with the other three anesthesia groups, between-group pathway differences were found in amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism, biofilm formation, cofactor and vitamin metabolism, and antibiotic synthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study elucidated oral microbiome characteristics in children under different anesthesia technology and found an enrichment of <i>Haemophilus</i> genus in the sevoflurane group compared to the Noa group. Our findings provide new insights into the effect of anesthetic on oral microbiota of children.</p>","PeriodicalId":23294,"journal":{"name":"Translational pediatrics","volume":"13 12","pages":"2097-2109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-24-336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral microbiome homeostasis is important for children's health, and microbial community is affected by anesthetics. The application of anesthetics in children's oral therapy has become a relatively mature method. This study aims to investigate the effect of different anesthesia techniques on children's oral microbiota.

Methods: Sixty children who visited the Department of Stomatology of the Jiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital were recruited. Subjects who did not receive anesthesia during the surgery were divided into non-anesthesia (Noa) group. Other children who accepted anesthesia during the surgery were grouped into lidocaine group, sevoflurane group, and intravenous injection-inhalation (intra-inhalation) group. Subsequently, their saliva samples were collected for 16S rDNA sequencing.

Results: A total of 1,316 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified in overall samples, and 75,275 reads per sample were obtained on average. There were 137 genera were shared among the Noa, lidocaine, sevoflurane, and intra-inhalation groups. The genera Neisseria, Prevotella-7, Streptococcus, and Veillonella had a higher abundance in the four groups. Compared to the Noa group, anesthetics increased the abundance of the genus Haemophilus in the anesthesia groups. Alpha and beta diversity analyses revealed significant differences in the comparisons of Noa vs. sevoflurane and Noa vs. intra-inhalation. In contrast, the difference between the lidocaine and the Noa groups was slight. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analyses identified 52, 16, and 37 differential microbes in the Noa vs. sevoflurane, Noa vs. lidocaine, and Noa vs. intra-inhalation comparisons, respectively. Notably, Haemophilus genus was significantly enriched in the sevoflurane group compared to the Noa group. When comparing the Noa group with the other three anesthesia groups, between-group pathway differences were found in amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism, biofilm formation, cofactor and vitamin metabolism, and antibiotic synthesis.

Conclusions: This study elucidated oral microbiome characteristics in children under different anesthesia technology and found an enrichment of Haemophilus genus in the sevoflurane group compared to the Noa group. Our findings provide new insights into the effect of anesthetic on oral microbiota of children.

麻醉药改变儿童口腔微生物组成,增加嗜血杆菌属的丰度。
背景:口腔微生物群稳态对儿童健康至关重要,而麻醉药物会影响口腔微生物群。麻醉药在儿童口腔治疗中的应用已经成为一种比较成熟的方法。本研究旨在探讨不同麻醉方式对儿童口腔微生物群的影响。方法:选取在江西省儿童医院口腔科就诊的儿童60例。术中未麻醉的患者分为非麻醉组(Noa)。其余术中麻醉患儿分为利多卡因组、七氟醚组和静脉注射-吸入(内吸入)组。随后,收集他们的唾液样本进行16S rDNA测序。结果:共鉴定出1316个操作分类单元(operational taxonomic units, otu),平均每个样本获得75275个reads。Noa组、利多卡因组、七氟醚组和吸入组共有137个属。奈瑟氏菌属、普雷沃氏菌-7、链球菌属和细孔菌属在四组中丰度较高。与Noa组相比,麻醉剂增加了麻醉组中嗜血杆菌属的丰度。α和β多样性分析显示,Noa与七氟醚、Noa与吸入之间的比较存在显著差异。相比之下,利多卡因组和Noa组之间的差异很小。线性判别分析效应大小(LEfSe)分析分别在Noa与七氟醚、Noa与利多卡因、Noa与吸入比较中鉴定出52、16和37种不同的微生物。值得注意的是,与Noa组相比,七氟醚组的嗜血杆菌属显著丰富。Noa组与其他3个麻醉组比较,在氨基酸代谢、能量代谢、生物膜形成、辅助因子和维生素代谢、抗生素合成等途径上存在组间差异。结论:本研究阐明了不同麻醉技术下儿童口腔微生物组的特征,发现七氟醚组与Noa组相比,嗜血杆菌属的丰富。我们的研究结果为麻醉对儿童口腔微生物群的影响提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational pediatrics
Translational pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信