Control Performance Of Amphibian Metamorphosis Assays With Xenopus Laevis.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
James R Wheeler, Raechel Puglisi, Adriana C Bejarano, Zhenglei Gao, Laurent Lagadic, Scott Glaberman, Constance A Mitchell, Natalie Burden, Valentin Mingo, Scott G Lynn, Michelle R Embry
{"title":"Control Performance Of Amphibian Metamorphosis Assays With Xenopus Laevis.","authors":"James R Wheeler, Raechel Puglisi, Adriana C Bejarano, Zhenglei Gao, Laurent Lagadic, Scott Glaberman, Constance A Mitchell, Natalie Burden, Valentin Mingo, Scott G Lynn, Michelle R Embry","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The amphibian metamorphosis assay (AMA) is an in vivo screen to assess potential interactions of chemicals with the amphibian thyroid system. Tadpoles are exposed for 21-days, then assessed for development and growth after 7 days and at test termination. This paper presents data from studies performed to satisfy test orders from the US EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program. Data Evaluation Records were used to collate the control variability and performance of biological endpoints in AMAs conducted in different laboratories, then supplemented with recent studies. We examine the statistical power of AMA endpoint analysis and assess whether historical control data (HCD) can assist evidence-based interpretation of the endpoints, with 52 studies from 7 different laboratories. HCD can be used to understand assay performance post validation. The analysis identifies some need for flexibility in the interpretation of the Test Guidelines' performance criteria, including latitude with analytical variability and statistical analysis of late-stage animals. Additionally, more guidance is suggested for feed regiments and the selection criteria for batches of animals to initiate the assay. Potential Guideline refinements that improve interpretation of the data and have potential to reduce the number of vertebrate animals used in the conduct of AMAs are identified and discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105773"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The amphibian metamorphosis assay (AMA) is an in vivo screen to assess potential interactions of chemicals with the amphibian thyroid system. Tadpoles are exposed for 21-days, then assessed for development and growth after 7 days and at test termination. This paper presents data from studies performed to satisfy test orders from the US EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program. Data Evaluation Records were used to collate the control variability and performance of biological endpoints in AMAs conducted in different laboratories, then supplemented with recent studies. We examine the statistical power of AMA endpoint analysis and assess whether historical control data (HCD) can assist evidence-based interpretation of the endpoints, with 52 studies from 7 different laboratories. HCD can be used to understand assay performance post validation. The analysis identifies some need for flexibility in the interpretation of the Test Guidelines' performance criteria, including latitude with analytical variability and statistical analysis of late-stage animals. Additionally, more guidance is suggested for feed regiments and the selection criteria for batches of animals to initiate the assay. Potential Guideline refinements that improve interpretation of the data and have potential to reduce the number of vertebrate animals used in the conduct of AMAs are identified and discussed.

非洲爪蟾防治两栖动物变态试验的效果。
两栖动物变态试验(AMA)是一种体内筛选,以评估化学物质与两栖动物甲状腺系统的潜在相互作用。蝌蚪暴露21天,然后在7天后和试验结束时评估发育和生长情况。本文介绍了为满足美国环境保护局内分泌干扰物筛选计划的测试要求而进行的研究数据。数据评估记录用于整理在不同实验室进行的ama生物终点的控制变异性和性能,然后补充最近的研究。我们通过来自7个不同实验室的52项研究,检验了AMA终点分析的统计能力,并评估了历史对照数据(HCD)是否有助于对终点的循证解释。HCD可用于了解验证后的分析性能。该分析确定了在解释《试验指南》的性能标准方面需要一些灵活性,包括具有分析变异性的纬度和后期动物的统计分析。此外,建议对饲料团和开始试验的动物批次的选择标准提供更多指导。确定并讨论了潜在的指南改进,以改进对数据的解释,并有可能减少用于进行ama的脊椎动物的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信