Is temporal synchrony necessary for effective Batesian mimicry?

IF 3.8 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Abigail E Robinson, Isabel Novick, Jessica Herrmann, Lily DeFelice, Aidan Engel, Dina Famin, Colleen Fetherston, Bianca Frintu, Julia Meyersiek, Musfika Mishi, Tran Gia Ha Nguyễn, Peter M Buston, Thomas N Sherratt, Sean P Mullen
{"title":"Is temporal synchrony necessary for effective Batesian mimicry?","authors":"Abigail E Robinson, Isabel Novick, Jessica Herrmann, Lily DeFelice, Aidan Engel, Dina Famin, Colleen Fetherston, Bianca Frintu, Julia Meyersiek, Musfika Mishi, Tran Gia Ha Nguyễn, Peter M Buston, Thomas N Sherratt, Sean P Mullen","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2024.1737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Batesian mimicry occurs when palatable mimics gain protection from predators by evolving a phenotypic resemblance to an aposematic model species. While common in nature, the mechanisms maintaining mimicry are not fully understood. Patterns of temporal synchrony (i.e. temporal co-occurrence) and model first occurrence have been observed in several mimicry systems, but the hypothesis that predator foraging decisions can drive the evolution of prey phenology has not been experimentally tested. Here, using phenotypically accurate butterfly replicas, we measured predation rates on the chemically defended model species <i>Battus philenor</i> and its imperfect Batesian mimic <i>Limenitis arthemis astyanax</i> under four different phenological conditions to understand the importance of temporal synchrony and model first occurrence in mimicry complexes. We predicted that protection for mimics increases when predators learn to avoid the models' aposematic signal right before encountering the mimic, and that learned avoidance breaks down over time in the model's absence. Surprisingly, we found that asynchronous model first occurrence, even on short time scales, did not provide increased protection for mimics. Mimics were only protected under conditions of temporal synchrony, suggesting that predators rely on current information, not previously learned information, when making foraging decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"292 2039","pages":"20241737"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.1737","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Batesian mimicry occurs when palatable mimics gain protection from predators by evolving a phenotypic resemblance to an aposematic model species. While common in nature, the mechanisms maintaining mimicry are not fully understood. Patterns of temporal synchrony (i.e. temporal co-occurrence) and model first occurrence have been observed in several mimicry systems, but the hypothesis that predator foraging decisions can drive the evolution of prey phenology has not been experimentally tested. Here, using phenotypically accurate butterfly replicas, we measured predation rates on the chemically defended model species Battus philenor and its imperfect Batesian mimic Limenitis arthemis astyanax under four different phenological conditions to understand the importance of temporal synchrony and model first occurrence in mimicry complexes. We predicted that protection for mimics increases when predators learn to avoid the models' aposematic signal right before encountering the mimic, and that learned avoidance breaks down over time in the model's absence. Surprisingly, we found that asynchronous model first occurrence, even on short time scales, did not provide increased protection for mimics. Mimics were only protected under conditions of temporal synchrony, suggesting that predators rely on current information, not previously learned information, when making foraging decisions.

时间同步性对于有效的贝叶斯模仿是必要的吗?
当美味的模仿者通过进化出与警告型模式物种相似的表型来获得免受捕食者的保护时,就会发生贝叶斯模仿。虽然在自然界中很常见,但维持模仿的机制尚不完全清楚。在一些模拟系统中已经观察到时间同步性(即时间共现)和模式先现的模式,但捕食者觅食决策可以驱动猎物物候进化的假设尚未得到实验验证。本文利用表型精确的蝴蝶复制品,测量了四种不同物候条件下化学防御模式物种batus philenor及其不完善的贝叶斯模拟物种Limenitis arthemis astyanax的捕食率,以了解模拟复体中时间同步和模型首次发生的重要性。我们预测,当捕食者在遇到模仿者之前学会避开模型发出的警告信号时,对模仿者的保护会增加,而在模型缺席的情况下,这种学会的回避会随着时间的推移而失效。令人惊讶的是,我们发现异步模型的首次出现,即使在很短的时间尺度上,也没有为模仿者提供更多的保护。模仿者只有在时间同步的条件下才受到保护,这表明捕食者在做出觅食决定时依赖于当前的信息,而不是以前学到的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
502
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Proceedings B is the Royal Society’s flagship biological research journal, accepting original articles and reviews of outstanding scientific importance and broad general interest. The main criteria for acceptance are that a study is novel, and has general significance to biologists. Articles published cover a wide range of areas within the biological sciences, many have relevance to organisms and the environments in which they live. The scope includes, but is not limited to, ecology, evolution, behavior, health and disease epidemiology, neuroscience and cognition, behavioral genetics, development, biomechanics, paleontology, comparative biology, molecular ecology and evolution, and global change biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信