Association of Antihypertensive and Statin Medication Usage With Postoperative Stiffness After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241305089
Andres R Perez, Henson Destiné, Nathaniel Kern, Neel K Patel, Anya T Hall, Manoj Reddy, Austin Looney, Kevin B Freedman, Fotios P Tjoumakaris
{"title":"Association of Antihypertensive and Statin Medication Usage With Postoperative Stiffness After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Andres R Perez, Henson Destiné, Nathaniel Kern, Neel K Patel, Anya T Hall, Manoj Reddy, Austin Looney, Kevin B Freedman, Fotios P Tjoumakaris","doi":"10.1177/23259671241305089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and statins may be able to modulate postoperative stiffness, a major cause of morbidity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether there is an association between ACEi, ARB, or statin usage and stiffness after aRCR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent primary aRCR between January 2016 and December 2019 were categorized into 4 groups depending on the usage of ACEi (n = 45), ARB (n = 27), statins (n = 53), or none of these medications (controls; n = 113). Range of motion in flexion, abduction, internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER) was recorded preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Functional outcomes were assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The groups were compared using <i>t</i> test or Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test for continuous data and chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, compared with controls, the ACEi group had decreased flexion (<i>P</i> = .038), abduction (<i>P</i> = .001), ER (<i>P</i> = .009), and IR (<i>P</i> = .015); the ARB group had decreased abduction (<i>P</i> = .012) and IR (<i>P</i> = .019); and the statins group had decreased abduction (<i>P</i> = .015), ER (<i>P</i> = .008), and IR (<i>P</i> = .011). Postoperatively, compared with controls, the ACEi group had decreased 6-month abduction (<i>P</i> = .034) that resolved by 12 months and 3-month ER (<i>P</i> = .004) that persisted into 6 months, the ARB group had greater ER at 12 months (<i>P</i> = .006), and the statins group had increased 6-week abduction (<i>P</i> = .017) that normalized by 3 months. Patients taking ACEi had lower postoperative ASES (30 vs 58.6; <i>P</i> = .001) and SANE scores (28.4 vs 52.3; <i>P</i> = .002) at 1 year and lower SST scores at 2 years (74.7 vs 85.5; <i>P</i> = .002) versus controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who used ACEi showed an increased risk of stiffness 6 months postoperatively and had worse SST scores at 2 years after aRCR, while those who used ARB demonstrated improved postoperative ER and IR, with no changes in functional outcomes at longer-term follow-ups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"23259671241305089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241305089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and statins may be able to modulate postoperative stiffness, a major cause of morbidity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR).

Purpose: To determine whether there is an association between ACEi, ARB, or statin usage and stiffness after aRCR.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Patients who underwent primary aRCR between January 2016 and December 2019 were categorized into 4 groups depending on the usage of ACEi (n = 45), ARB (n = 27), statins (n = 53), or none of these medications (controls; n = 113). Range of motion in flexion, abduction, internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER) was recorded preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Functional outcomes were assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The groups were compared using t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data and chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical data.

Results: Preoperatively, compared with controls, the ACEi group had decreased flexion (P = .038), abduction (P = .001), ER (P = .009), and IR (P = .015); the ARB group had decreased abduction (P = .012) and IR (P = .019); and the statins group had decreased abduction (P = .015), ER (P = .008), and IR (P = .011). Postoperatively, compared with controls, the ACEi group had decreased 6-month abduction (P = .034) that resolved by 12 months and 3-month ER (P = .004) that persisted into 6 months, the ARB group had greater ER at 12 months (P = .006), and the statins group had increased 6-week abduction (P = .017) that normalized by 3 months. Patients taking ACEi had lower postoperative ASES (30 vs 58.6; P = .001) and SANE scores (28.4 vs 52.3; P = .002) at 1 year and lower SST scores at 2 years (74.7 vs 85.5; P = .002) versus controls.

Conclusion: Patients who used ACEi showed an increased risk of stiffness 6 months postoperatively and had worse SST scores at 2 years after aRCR, while those who used ARB demonstrated improved postoperative ER and IR, with no changes in functional outcomes at longer-term follow-ups.

抗高血压和他汀类药物的使用与关节镜下肩袖修复术后僵硬的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)和他汀类药物可能能够调节术后僵硬,这是关节镜下肩袖修复(aRCR)后发病率的主要原因。目的:确定ACEi、ARB或他汀类药物使用与aRCR后僵硬度之间是否存在关联。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:2016年1月至2019年12月期间接受原发性aRCR的患者根据ACEi (n = 45)、ARB (n = 27)、他汀类药物(n = 53)的使用情况分为4组(对照组;N = 113)。术前、术后6周、3、6、12个月分别记录屈曲、外展、内旋(IR)、外旋(ER)活动范围。术前、术后1年和2年分别用美国肩关节外科医生(asas)评分、单一评估数值评估(SANE)和简单肩关节测试(SST)评估功能结局。组间比较对连续资料采用t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验,对分类资料采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。结果:术前,与对照组相比,ACEi组屈曲(P = 0.038)、外展(P = 0.001)、ER (P = 0.009)、IR (P = 0.015)降低;ARB组外展(P = 0.012)和IR (P = 0.019)明显减少;他汀类药物组外展(P = 0.015)、ER (P = 0.008)、IR (P = 0.011)明显降低。术后,与对照组相比,ACEi组6个月外展减少(P = 0.034), 12个月后消失,3个月后ER持续(P = 0.004), ARB组12个月时ER增加(P = 0.006),他汀类药物组6周外展增加(P = 0.017), 3个月后正常化。服用ACEi的患者术后asa较低(30 vs 58.6;P = .001)和SANE评分(28.4 vs 52.3;P = .002), 2年时SST评分较低(74.7 vs 85.5;P = .002)。结论:使用ACEi的患者在术后6个月出现僵硬风险增加,并且在aRCR后2年的SST评分更差,而使用ARB的患者在术后ER和IR中表现出改善,在长期随访中功能结局没有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信