Robot-Assisted Positioning for Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1111/os.14323
Shuai Jiang, Fei Xu, Zhuofu Li, Chuiguo Sun, Woquan Zhong, Chengxia Wang, Weishi Li
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Positioning for Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy.","authors":"Shuai Jiang, Fei Xu, Zhuofu Li, Chuiguo Sun, Woquan Zhong, Chengxia Wang, Weishi Li","doi":"10.1111/os.14323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID), a range of technologies including medical robotics, visual navigation, and spatial registration have been proposed to expand the application scope and success rate of minimally invasive surgery. The use of robotic technology in surgery is conducive to improving accuracy and reducing risk. This study aims to introduce a precise and efficient targeting method tailored for robot-assisted positioning under C-arm fluoroscopy inPEID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 107 patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital from February 2023 to February 2024 (average age: 43.3 ± 13.3 years; 61 males and 43 females). The method entails constructing a specialized end-effector capable of simultaneous fluoroscopy calibration and robot-to-image-space registration. The average time of the surgical procedure and the average number of fluoroscopy exposures were collected. Preoperative and postoperative follow-up data were collected, including assessment scores from the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Paired t-tests were employed to compare differences in each clinical outcome between the preoperative and follow-up time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These techniques effectively reduce both radiation exposure and operation time. Clinical data reveals that the average time for robot-assisted positioning stands at 2.5 ± 0.7 min, with anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating accuracies of 2.4 ± 2.8 mm and 3.1 ± 3.7 mm, respectively, during robot-assisted positioning. Postoperative VAS scores for back pain and leg pain were significantly lower than preoperative scores (1.2 ± 1.8 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3, 0.9 ± 2.0 vs. 5.9 ± 1.8; p < 0.05, p < 0.05, respectively). Postoperative JOA scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores (26.1 ± 3.5 vs. 14.5 ± 4.9; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through the evaluation of the system in robot-assisted positioning during PEID, this study substantiates the accuracy and reliability of the proposed method in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"773-780"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: During percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID), a range of technologies including medical robotics, visual navigation, and spatial registration have been proposed to expand the application scope and success rate of minimally invasive surgery. The use of robotic technology in surgery is conducive to improving accuracy and reducing risk. This study aims to introduce a precise and efficient targeting method tailored for robot-assisted positioning under C-arm fluoroscopy inPEID.

Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 107 patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital from February 2023 to February 2024 (average age: 43.3 ± 13.3 years; 61 males and 43 females). The method entails constructing a specialized end-effector capable of simultaneous fluoroscopy calibration and robot-to-image-space registration. The average time of the surgical procedure and the average number of fluoroscopy exposures were collected. Preoperative and postoperative follow-up data were collected, including assessment scores from the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Paired t-tests were employed to compare differences in each clinical outcome between the preoperative and follow-up time.

Results: These techniques effectively reduce both radiation exposure and operation time. Clinical data reveals that the average time for robot-assisted positioning stands at 2.5 ± 0.7 min, with anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating accuracies of 2.4 ± 2.8 mm and 3.1 ± 3.7 mm, respectively, during robot-assisted positioning. Postoperative VAS scores for back pain and leg pain were significantly lower than preoperative scores (1.2 ± 1.8 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3, 0.9 ± 2.0 vs. 5.9 ± 1.8; p < 0.05, p < 0.05, respectively). Postoperative JOA scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores (26.1 ± 3.5 vs. 14.5 ± 4.9; p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Through the evaluation of the system in robot-assisted positioning during PEID, this study substantiates the accuracy and reliability of the proposed method in clinical applications.

经皮内窥镜椎间盘切除术中机器人辅助定位。
目的:在经皮内窥镜椎间盘切除术(percutaneous interlaminar disectomy, PEID)中,提出医疗机器人、视觉导航、空间配准等一系列技术,以扩大微创手术的应用范围和成功率。机器人技术在外科手术中的应用有利于提高手术精度,降低手术风险。本研究旨在介绍一种针对c臂透视下机器人辅助定位的精确高效的定位方法。方法:回顾性分析2023年2月至2024年2月在我院行手术治疗的腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者107例(平均年龄:43.3±13.3岁;61名男性,43名女性)。该方法需要构建一个专门的末端执行器,能够同时进行透视校准和机器人到图像空间的配准。收集手术的平均时间和平均透视次数。收集术前和术后随访数据,包括日本骨科协会(JOA)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)的评估评分。采用配对t检验比较术前和随访期间各临床结果的差异。结果:这些技术有效地减少了辐射暴露和手术时间。临床数据显示,机器人辅助定位的平均时间为2.5±0.7 min,正位片和侧位片显示机器人辅助定位的精度分别为2.4±2.8 mm和3.1±3.7 mm。术后腰痛和腿痛的VAS评分明显低于术前评分(1.2±1.8比4.1±2.3,0.9±2.0比5.9±1.8;p结论:通过对该系统在PEID期间机器人辅助定位中的评估,本研究证实了该方法在临床应用中的准确性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信