Diagnostic Accuracy of Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area in Suspected Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1002/mus.28326
Diederik J L Stikvoort García, Leonard H van den Berg, Boudewijn T H M Sleutjes, H Stephan Goedee
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area in Suspected Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.","authors":"Diederik J L Stikvoort García, Leonard H van den Berg, Boudewijn T H M Sleutjes, H Stephan Goedee","doi":"10.1002/mus.28326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Reduced nerve sizes obtained by nerve ultrasound (NUS) have been proposed as a potential diagnostic marker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, prospective studies evaluating patients with suspected ALS are currently lacking. We, therefore, evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a standardized NUS protocol in a large sample of suspected ALS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively recruited 193 patients with suspected ALS, all of whom underwent the relevant ancillary tests. They also underwent a standardized NUS protocol, evaluating median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at upper arm, forearm and wrist. Additionally, we selected, retrospectively, a random sample of incident patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN, n = 42). We determined diagnostic accuracy using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultimately, 143/193 patients received a final diagnosis of ALS, at a median disease duration of 10 months. Fifty patients were classified as non-ALS. Diagnostic yield of NUS to distinguish between patients with and without ALS was low (highest area under the curve (AUC) at the wrist: 0.57). In contrast, abnormal nerve sizes accurately discriminated MMN from patients with ALS, with AUCs ranging from 0.65 at the wrist to 0.86 at the upper arm.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study shows that reductions in nerve size are unlikely to have diagnostic utility during routine evaluation of suspected patients with ALS. However, when the differential diagnosis includes both ALS and MMN, median nerve size demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":"680-684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Reduced nerve sizes obtained by nerve ultrasound (NUS) have been proposed as a potential diagnostic marker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, prospective studies evaluating patients with suspected ALS are currently lacking. We, therefore, evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a standardized NUS protocol in a large sample of suspected ALS patients.

Methods: We prospectively recruited 193 patients with suspected ALS, all of whom underwent the relevant ancillary tests. They also underwent a standardized NUS protocol, evaluating median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at upper arm, forearm and wrist. Additionally, we selected, retrospectively, a random sample of incident patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN, n = 42). We determined diagnostic accuracy using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: Ultimately, 143/193 patients received a final diagnosis of ALS, at a median disease duration of 10 months. Fifty patients were classified as non-ALS. Diagnostic yield of NUS to distinguish between patients with and without ALS was low (highest area under the curve (AUC) at the wrist: 0.57). In contrast, abnormal nerve sizes accurately discriminated MMN from patients with ALS, with AUCs ranging from 0.65 at the wrist to 0.86 at the upper arm.

Discussion: Our study shows that reductions in nerve size are unlikely to have diagnostic utility during routine evaluation of suspected patients with ALS. However, when the differential diagnosis includes both ALS and MMN, median nerve size demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy.

怀疑肌萎缩侧索硬化症正中神经横截面积的诊断准确性。
简介/目的:神经超声(NUS)获得的神经大小缩小已被提出作为肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的潜在诊断标志。然而,目前缺乏评估疑似ALS患者的前瞻性研究。因此,我们在大量疑似ALS患者样本中评估了标准化NUS方案的诊断准确性。方法:我们前瞻性地招募了193例疑似ALS患者,所有患者都进行了相关的辅助检查。他们还接受了标准化的NUS方案,评估上臂、前臂和手腕的正中神经横截面积(CSA)。此外,我们回顾性地随机选择了多灶性运动神经病变(MMN, n = 42)患者。我们使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来确定诊断的准确性。结果:193例患者中有143例最终被诊断为ALS,平均病程为10个月。50例患者被分类为非als。NUS用于区分ALS患者和非ALS患者的诊断率较低(手腕处曲线下面积(AUC)最高:0.57)。相反,异常的神经大小可以准确地区分MMN与ALS患者,auc范围从手腕的0.65到上臂的0.86。讨论:我们的研究表明,神经大小的减少在对疑似ALS患者的常规评估中不太可能有诊断价值。然而,当鉴别诊断包括ALS和MMN时,正中神经大小显示出较高的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信