Delirium prevention in hospices: Opportunities and limitations - A focused ethnography.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Imogen Featherstone, Miriam J Johnson, Trevor Sheldon, Rachael Kelley, Rebecca Hawkins, Alison Bravington, Sarah Callin, Rachael Dixon, George Obita, Najma Siddiqi
{"title":"Delirium prevention in hospices: Opportunities and limitations - A focused ethnography.","authors":"Imogen Featherstone, Miriam J Johnson, Trevor Sheldon, Rachael Kelley, Rebecca Hawkins, Alison Bravington, Sarah Callin, Rachael Dixon, George Obita, Najma Siddiqi","doi":"10.1177/02692163241310762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is common and distressing for hospice in-patients. Hospital-based research shows delirium may be prevented by targeting its risk factors. Many preventative strategies address patients' fundamental care needs. However, there is little research regarding how interventions need to be tailored to the in-patient hospice setting.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the behaviours of hospice in-patient staff in relation to delirium prevention, and the influences that shape these behaviours.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Focused ethnography supported by behaviour change theory. Observation, semi-structured interviews and document review were conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>A total of 89 participants (multidisciplinary staff, volunteers, patients and relatives) at two UK in-patient hospice units.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospice clinicians engaged in many behaviours associated with prevention of delirium as part of person-centred fundamental care, without delirium prevention as an explicit aim. Carrying out essential care tasks was highly valued and supported by adequate staffing levels, multidisciplinary team engagement and role clarity. Patients' reduced physical capability limited some delirium prevention behaviours, as did clinicians' behavioural norms related to prioritising patient comfort. Delirium prevention was not embedded into routine assessment and care decision-making, despite its potential to reduce patient distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The value placed on fundamental care in hospices supports delirium prevention behaviours but these require adaptation as patients become closer to death. There is a need to increase clinicians' understanding of the potential for delirium prevention to reduce patient distress during illness progression; to support inclusion of delirium prevention in making decisions about care; and to embed routine review of delirium risk factors in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2692163241310762"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241310762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delirium is common and distressing for hospice in-patients. Hospital-based research shows delirium may be prevented by targeting its risk factors. Many preventative strategies address patients' fundamental care needs. However, there is little research regarding how interventions need to be tailored to the in-patient hospice setting.

Aim: To explore the behaviours of hospice in-patient staff in relation to delirium prevention, and the influences that shape these behaviours.

Design: Focused ethnography supported by behaviour change theory. Observation, semi-structured interviews and document review were conducted.

Setting/participants: A total of 89 participants (multidisciplinary staff, volunteers, patients and relatives) at two UK in-patient hospice units.

Results: Hospice clinicians engaged in many behaviours associated with prevention of delirium as part of person-centred fundamental care, without delirium prevention as an explicit aim. Carrying out essential care tasks was highly valued and supported by adequate staffing levels, multidisciplinary team engagement and role clarity. Patients' reduced physical capability limited some delirium prevention behaviours, as did clinicians' behavioural norms related to prioritising patient comfort. Delirium prevention was not embedded into routine assessment and care decision-making, despite its potential to reduce patient distress.

Conclusions: The value placed on fundamental care in hospices supports delirium prevention behaviours but these require adaptation as patients become closer to death. There is a need to increase clinicians' understanding of the potential for delirium prevention to reduce patient distress during illness progression; to support inclusion of delirium prevention in making decisions about care; and to embed routine review of delirium risk factors in practice.

在临终关怀预防谵妄:机会和限制-集中人种志。
背景:谵妄是安宁疗护住院病人常见且痛苦的症状。基于医院的研究表明,可以通过针对其风险因素来预防谵妄。许多预防策略解决了患者的基本护理需求。然而,很少有研究关于如何干预需要量身定制的住院安宁疗护设置。目的:探讨安宁疗护住院人员在预防谵妄方面的行为,以及影响这些行为的因素。设计:以行为改变理论为基础的重点人种学。进行了观察、半结构化访谈和文件审查。环境/参与者:共有89名参与者(多学科工作人员、志愿者、患者和亲属)在两个英国住院临终关怀病房。结果:安宁疗护临床医师从事许多与预防谵妄相关的行为,作为以人为本的基本照护的一部分,而没有将预防谵妄作为明确的目标。充分的人员配备水平、多学科团队参与和角色明确,高度重视和支持开展基本护理任务。患者身体能力的下降限制了一些谵妄预防行为,正如临床医生优先考虑患者舒适度的行为规范一样。谵妄预防没有被纳入常规评估和护理决策,尽管它有可能减少病人的痛苦。结论:临终关怀的基本护理的价值支持谵妄预防行为,但这些需要适应,因为病人越来越接近死亡。有必要提高临床医生对预防谵妄的潜力的理解,以减少患者在疾病进展期间的痛苦;支持将预防谵妄纳入护理决策;并在实践中纳入谵妄危险因素的常规审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信