Fluid Management Bundle in Critically Ill Children With Respiratory Failure Is Associated With a Reduced Prevalence of Excess Fluid Accumulation.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Matthew J Foglia, Sarah M Bedoyan, Christopher M Horvat, Anthony Fabio, Dana Y Fuhrman
{"title":"Fluid Management Bundle in Critically Ill Children With Respiratory Failure Is Associated With a Reduced Prevalence of Excess Fluid Accumulation.","authors":"Matthew J Foglia, Sarah M Bedoyan, Christopher M Horvat, Anthony Fabio, Dana Y Fuhrman","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report the feasibility of a fluid management practice bundle and describe the pre- vs. post-implementation prevalence and odds of cumulative fluid balance greater than 10% in critically ill pediatric patients with respiratory failure.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort from May 2022 to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Quaternary care PICU in Pittsburgh, PA.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children older than 28 days receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We reviewed data from 205 patients; 104 before bundle implementation and 101 after bundle implementation. At the time of implementation in 2022, our PICU clinicians were educated on the use of the fluid management practice bundle, which included the following during daily rounds: goal-setting for daily fluid balance; assessing transition to enteral nutrition; and fluid conservation measures such as concentrating infusions or using enteral formulations of medications. A cumulative fluid balance greater than 10% occurred in 46 of 104 patients (44%) pre-implementation and 26 of 101 patients (26%) post-implementation. We failed to identify an association between implementation epoch grouping (pre- and post-) and adverse outcomes, including mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, and ICU length of stay. In a multivariable logistic regression model, management during the fluid management bundle was associated with lower odds of a cumulative fluid balance greater than 10% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.18-0.68]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our PICUs 2022 peri-implementation testing of a fluid management bundle in critically ill children with respiratory failure, we have first found that such a practice change is feasible. Second, we identified an associated decrease in the prevalence and lower odds of fluid accumulation. We continue to use this fluid management bundle in our center but more widespread prospective studies are needed to test the benefit in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003693","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To report the feasibility of a fluid management practice bundle and describe the pre- vs. post-implementation prevalence and odds of cumulative fluid balance greater than 10% in critically ill pediatric patients with respiratory failure.

Design: Retrospective cohort from May 2022 to December 2022.

Setting: Quaternary care PICU in Pittsburgh, PA.

Patients: Children older than 28 days receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 hours.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We reviewed data from 205 patients; 104 before bundle implementation and 101 after bundle implementation. At the time of implementation in 2022, our PICU clinicians were educated on the use of the fluid management practice bundle, which included the following during daily rounds: goal-setting for daily fluid balance; assessing transition to enteral nutrition; and fluid conservation measures such as concentrating infusions or using enteral formulations of medications. A cumulative fluid balance greater than 10% occurred in 46 of 104 patients (44%) pre-implementation and 26 of 101 patients (26%) post-implementation. We failed to identify an association between implementation epoch grouping (pre- and post-) and adverse outcomes, including mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, and ICU length of stay. In a multivariable logistic regression model, management during the fluid management bundle was associated with lower odds of a cumulative fluid balance greater than 10% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.18-0.68]).

Conclusions: In our PICUs 2022 peri-implementation testing of a fluid management bundle in critically ill children with respiratory failure, we have first found that such a practice change is feasible. Second, we identified an associated decrease in the prevalence and lower odds of fluid accumulation. We continue to use this fluid management bundle in our center but more widespread prospective studies are needed to test the benefit in clinical practice.

危重儿童呼吸衰竭的液体管理捆绑与减少过量液体积聚的患病率相关。
目的:报告液体管理实践包的可行性,并描述实施前与实施后在危重儿科呼吸衰竭患者中累积液体平衡大于10%的患病率和几率。设计:2022年5月至2022年12月的回顾性队列。地点:宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡的PICU四级护理中心。患者:大于28天的儿童接受有创机械通气超过48小时。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:我们回顾了205例患者的数据;在bundle实现之前是104,在bundle实现之后是101。在2022年实施时,我们的PICU临床医生接受了关于使用液体管理实践包的培训,其中包括每日查房的以下内容:设定每日液体平衡的目标;评估向肠内营养过渡;以及液体保护措施,如集中输液或使用肠内药物配方。104例患者中有46例(44%)实施前体液平衡大于10%,101例患者中有26例(26%)实施后。我们未能确定实施时间分组(术前和术后)与不良结局(包括死亡率、机械通气持续时间、急性肾损伤和ICU住院时间)之间的关联。在多变量logistic回归模型中,在流体管理期间进行管理与累积流体平衡大于10%的几率较低相关(校正优势比为0.35 [95% CI, 0.18-0.68])。结论:在我们的PICUs 2022对重症呼吸衰竭儿童进行液体管理捆绑的实施期测试中,我们首次发现这种做法的改变是可行的。其次,我们确定了相关的患病率下降和液体积聚的几率降低。我们继续在我们的中心使用这种流体管理组合,但需要更广泛的前瞻性研究来测试临床实践中的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信