Predicting Robotic Hysterectomy Incision Time: Optimizing Surgical Scheduling with Machine Learning.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Vaishali Shah, Halley C Yung, Jie Yang, Justin Zaslavsky, Gabriela N Algarroba, Alyssa Pullano, Hannah C Karpel, Nicole Munoz, Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs, Mark Saraceni, Paresh Shah, Simon Jones, Kathy Huang
{"title":"Predicting Robotic Hysterectomy Incision Time: Optimizing Surgical Scheduling with Machine Learning.","authors":"Vaishali Shah, Halley C Yung, Jie Yang, Justin Zaslavsky, Gabriela N Algarroba, Alyssa Pullano, Hannah C Karpel, Nicole Munoz, Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs, Mark Saraceni, Paresh Shah, Simon Jones, Kathy Huang","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Operating rooms (ORs) are critical for hospital revenue and cost management, with utilization efficiency directly affecting financial outcomes. Traditional surgical scheduling often results in suboptimal OR use. We aim to build a machine learning (ML) model to predict incision times for robotic-assisted hysterectomies, enhancing scheduling accuracy and hospital finances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using data from robotic-assisted hysterectomy cases performed between January 2017 and April 2021 across 3 hospitals within a large academic health system. Cases were filtered for surgeries performed by high-volume surgeons and those with an incision time of under 3 hours (n = 2,702). Features influencing incision time were extracted from electronic medical records and used to train 5 ML models (linear ridge regression, random forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, and explainable boosting machine [EBM]). Model performance was evaluated using a dynamic monthly update process and novel metrics such as wait-time blocks and excess-time blocks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EBM model was selected for its superior performance compared to the other models. The model reduced the number of excess-time blocks from 1,113 to 905 (<i>P</i> < .001, 95% CI [-329 to -89]), translating to approximately 52-hours over the 51-month study period. The model predicted more surgeries within a 15% range of the true incision time compared to traditional methods. Influential features included surgeon experience, number of additional procedures, body mass index (BMI), and uterine size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ML model enhanced the prediction of incision times for robotic-assisted hysterectomies, providing a potential solution to reduce OR underutilization and increase surgical throughput and hospital revenue.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Operating rooms (ORs) are critical for hospital revenue and cost management, with utilization efficiency directly affecting financial outcomes. Traditional surgical scheduling often results in suboptimal OR use. We aim to build a machine learning (ML) model to predict incision times for robotic-assisted hysterectomies, enhancing scheduling accuracy and hospital finances.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using data from robotic-assisted hysterectomy cases performed between January 2017 and April 2021 across 3 hospitals within a large academic health system. Cases were filtered for surgeries performed by high-volume surgeons and those with an incision time of under 3 hours (n = 2,702). Features influencing incision time were extracted from electronic medical records and used to train 5 ML models (linear ridge regression, random forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, and explainable boosting machine [EBM]). Model performance was evaluated using a dynamic monthly update process and novel metrics such as wait-time blocks and excess-time blocks.

Results: The EBM model was selected for its superior performance compared to the other models. The model reduced the number of excess-time blocks from 1,113 to 905 (P < .001, 95% CI [-329 to -89]), translating to approximately 52-hours over the 51-month study period. The model predicted more surgeries within a 15% range of the true incision time compared to traditional methods. Influential features included surgeon experience, number of additional procedures, body mass index (BMI), and uterine size.

Conclusion: The ML model enhanced the prediction of incision times for robotic-assisted hysterectomies, providing a potential solution to reduce OR underutilization and increase surgical throughput and hospital revenue.

预测机器人子宫切除术切口时间:利用机器学习优化手术计划。
背景和目的:手术室(or)是医院收入和成本管理的关键,其利用效率直接影响财务结果。传统的手术安排常常导致手术室的次优使用。我们的目标是建立一个机器学习(ML)模型来预测机器人辅助子宫切除术的切口时间,提高计划的准确性和医院的财务。方法:回顾性研究使用了2017年1月至2021年4月在大型学术卫生系统内的3家医院进行的机器人辅助子宫切除术病例的数据。筛选由大容量外科医生进行的手术和切口时间小于3小时的病例(n = 2,702)。从电子病历中提取影响切口时间的特征,并用于训练5ml模型(线性脊回归、随机森林、XGBoost、CatBoost和可解释增强机[EBM])。模型的性能使用每月动态更新过程和新的指标(如等待时间块和多余时间块)进行评估。结果:选择EBM模型是由于其性能优于其他模型。该模型将多余的时间块从1113块减少到905块(P结论:ML模型增强了机器人辅助子宫切除术的切口时间预测,为减少手术室利用率不足,增加手术通量和医院收入提供了潜在的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信