Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for primary hyperhidrosis: an over a decade-long follow-up on efficacy, impact, and patient satisfaction.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-1407
Néstor J Martínez-Hernández, Míriam Estors-Guerrero, José M Galbis-Caravajal, David Hervás-Marín, Amparo Roig-Bataller
{"title":"Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for primary hyperhidrosis: an over a decade-long follow-up on efficacy, impact, and patient satisfaction.","authors":"Néstor J Martínez-Hernández, Míriam Estors-Guerrero, José M Galbis-Caravajal, David Hervás-Marín, Amparo Roig-Bataller","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy is a well-known and effective treatment for palmar and axillary primary hyperhidrosis (PHH). Its most frequent drawback and the main complaint among patients who underwent surgery is the appearance of compensatory sweating (CS). To date, no long-term studies using internationally standardized tools have assessed the efficacy and impact of this surgery on patients. In this study we performed a very long-term follow-up of the patients using an internationally validated tool. The aim of this article is to assess the technique as a treatment for hyperhidrosis, focusing on its long-term efficacy, side effects (CS), and patient satisfaction with the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A closed cohort study was performed conducting a review of the clinical records to identify 100 consecutive patients who underwent bilateral endoscopic thoracic surgery with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Patients with diagnoses other than primary palmar or axillary hyperhidrosis or those for whom follow-up was impossible were excluded. A structured telephone survey, including the International Hyperhidrosis Society \"Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale\" (HDSS) was conducted for all patients. Data were summarized using median (1<sup>st</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> quartiles) for quantitative variables and relative and absolute frequencies for qualitative variables. To study the likelihood of a patient recommending the surgery, a Bayesian logistic regression model was used reporting results as odds ratio (OR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 91 patients were included in the follow-up. The median follow-up duration was 10.66 (5.68, 11.98) years. The most affected zone was the hands (29.67%), and the most common sympathectomy levels were R2 and R3 (68.13%). The overall surgical efficacy rate was of 94.50% and CS appeared in 36.26% of the patients, with 75.76% of these cases being mild and severe in only one patient. In total, 97.8% of patients improved their HDSS score after surgery. The OR of recommending the surgery for a lower HDSS index was 0.24 and 0.18 for the apparition of CS. Despite it, 91.21% of patients recommend the surgery, with an overall satisfaction rate of 93.95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy is an effective and safe treatment for palmar and axillary PHH, with a relatively low rate of CS which, when present, is typically mild, making it a highly satisfactory treatment option for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"16 12","pages":"8292-8299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy is a well-known and effective treatment for palmar and axillary primary hyperhidrosis (PHH). Its most frequent drawback and the main complaint among patients who underwent surgery is the appearance of compensatory sweating (CS). To date, no long-term studies using internationally standardized tools have assessed the efficacy and impact of this surgery on patients. In this study we performed a very long-term follow-up of the patients using an internationally validated tool. The aim of this article is to assess the technique as a treatment for hyperhidrosis, focusing on its long-term efficacy, side effects (CS), and patient satisfaction with the procedure.

Methods: A closed cohort study was performed conducting a review of the clinical records to identify 100 consecutive patients who underwent bilateral endoscopic thoracic surgery with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Patients with diagnoses other than primary palmar or axillary hyperhidrosis or those for whom follow-up was impossible were excluded. A structured telephone survey, including the International Hyperhidrosis Society "Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale" (HDSS) was conducted for all patients. Data were summarized using median (1st and 3rd quartiles) for quantitative variables and relative and absolute frequencies for qualitative variables. To study the likelihood of a patient recommending the surgery, a Bayesian logistic regression model was used reporting results as odds ratio (OR).

Results: A total of 91 patients were included in the follow-up. The median follow-up duration was 10.66 (5.68, 11.98) years. The most affected zone was the hands (29.67%), and the most common sympathectomy levels were R2 and R3 (68.13%). The overall surgical efficacy rate was of 94.50% and CS appeared in 36.26% of the patients, with 75.76% of these cases being mild and severe in only one patient. In total, 97.8% of patients improved their HDSS score after surgery. The OR of recommending the surgery for a lower HDSS index was 0.24 and 0.18 for the apparition of CS. Despite it, 91.21% of patients recommend the surgery, with an overall satisfaction rate of 93.95%.

Conclusions: Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy is an effective and safe treatment for palmar and axillary PHH, with a relatively low rate of CS which, when present, is typically mild, making it a highly satisfactory treatment option for patients.

内窥镜胸椎交感神经切除术治疗原发性多汗症:超过十年的疗效、影响和患者满意度随访。
背景:内窥镜胸椎交感神经切除术是一种众所周知的治疗手掌和腋窝原发性多汗症(PHH)的有效方法。其最常见的缺点和主要抱怨患者接受手术是代偿性出汗(CS)的出现。迄今为止,尚无使用国际标准化工具的长期研究评估该手术对患者的疗效和影响。在这项研究中,我们使用国际认可的工具对患者进行了长期随访。本文的目的是评估该技术作为多汗症的治疗方法,重点关注其长期疗效、副作用(CS)和患者对手术的满意度。方法:进行一项封闭队列研究,回顾临床记录,确定100例连续接受双侧内窥镜胸腔镜手术的患者,随访时间至少为2年。排除除原发性掌部或腋窝多汗症以外的诊断或无法随访的患者。对所有患者进行结构化电话调查,包括国际多汗症协会“多汗症严重程度量表”(HDSS)。定量变量采用中位数(第一和第三四分位数),定性变量采用相对和绝对频率。为了研究患者推荐手术的可能性,使用贝叶斯逻辑回归模型将结果报告为优势比(OR)。结果:共纳入91例患者。中位随访时间为10.66(5.68,11.98)年。受影响最大的是手部(29.67%),最常见的交感神经切除水平是R2和R3(68.13%)。手术总有效率为94.50%,CS发生率为36.26%,其中轻、重度仅1例,占75.76%。总的来说,97.8%的患者术后HDSS评分有所改善。HDSS指数较低推荐手术的OR为0.24,CS出现推荐手术的OR为0.18。尽管如此,91.21%的患者推荐手术,总体满意率为93.95%。结论:内窥镜胸椎交感神经切除术是一种有效且安全的治疗掌部和腋窝PHH的方法,CS发生率相对较低,当出现时通常是轻微的,使其成为患者非常满意的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信