{"title":"Short-term and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation from marginal donors: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Leyan Chen, Chaojian Chen, Yongqi Cheng, Jiaji Zhou, Feifan Ge, Huachi Jiang, Guibin Qiao, Feng Liu","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To expand the donor pool, medical centers worldwide are applying marginal donor lungs in clinical settings. We carried out this research to reveal the short-term and long-term outcomes of marginal lung donor transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed retrospective research using data from patients who underwent lung transplantation (LT) in The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province, China, between 2018 and 2022 to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of standard donors and marginal donors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 553 cases were incorporated in this study. The perioperative mortality of recipients who received marginal donor lungs was around 20.8%, compared with 13.4% in the standard donor recipients (P=0.03). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, occurrence of primary graft dysfunction, and prevalence of acute rejection. The 1-year survival rate for recipients in the standard group and marginal group was 71.7% and 54.2% (P<0.001), respectively. There was a worse survival rate in the subgroups of age >55 years, smoking ≥20 pack-years, and abnormal chest radiographs; however, the 1-year survival rate in the subgroup analysis of donors with ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) <300 mmHg and purulent secretions on bronchoscopy was not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that marginal donor recipients can expect to have a lower survival rate than standard donor recipients. However, marginal lung transplant recipients could also gain benefit equivalent to that provided by standard donor LTs in both the short- and long-term when proper assessment and management strategies are implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"16 12","pages":"8656-8668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To expand the donor pool, medical centers worldwide are applying marginal donor lungs in clinical settings. We carried out this research to reveal the short-term and long-term outcomes of marginal lung donor transplantation.
Methods: We performed retrospective research using data from patients who underwent lung transplantation (LT) in The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province, China, between 2018 and 2022 to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of standard donors and marginal donors.
Results: A total of 553 cases were incorporated in this study. The perioperative mortality of recipients who received marginal donor lungs was around 20.8%, compared with 13.4% in the standard donor recipients (P=0.03). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, occurrence of primary graft dysfunction, and prevalence of acute rejection. The 1-year survival rate for recipients in the standard group and marginal group was 71.7% and 54.2% (P<0.001), respectively. There was a worse survival rate in the subgroups of age >55 years, smoking ≥20 pack-years, and abnormal chest radiographs; however, the 1-year survival rate in the subgroup analysis of donors with ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) <300 mmHg and purulent secretions on bronchoscopy was not significantly different.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that marginal donor recipients can expect to have a lower survival rate than standard donor recipients. However, marginal lung transplant recipients could also gain benefit equivalent to that provided by standard donor LTs in both the short- and long-term when proper assessment and management strategies are implemented.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.