An introduction to propensity score analysis in acute care surgery research: Methodology and pitfalls.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Tabitha Garwe, Zakhary L Bishoy
{"title":"An introduction to propensity score analysis in acute care surgery research: Methodology and pitfalls.","authors":"Tabitha Garwe, Zakhary L Bishoy","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Observational studies assessing causal effects of interventions are subject to indication (selection) bias, which may be difficult to eliminate using traditional multivariable techniques. When properly specified, propensity score-adjusted analysis may offer an advantage traditional regression by ensuring that investigators explicitly assess comparability of baseline prognostic factors between the treated and untreated. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of a propensity score-adjusted analysis depends on the variables selected for the model and the analytic approach. Noninclusion of important prognostic factors and model misspecification among other errors may in fact increase bias; thus, in performing propensity score analysis, these errors must be minimized as much as possible or assessed using sensitivity analysis to ensure validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Observational studies assessing causal effects of interventions are subject to indication (selection) bias, which may be difficult to eliminate using traditional multivariable techniques. When properly specified, propensity score-adjusted analysis may offer an advantage traditional regression by ensuring that investigators explicitly assess comparability of baseline prognostic factors between the treated and untreated. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of a propensity score-adjusted analysis depends on the variables selected for the model and the analytic approach. Noninclusion of important prognostic factors and model misspecification among other errors may in fact increase bias; thus, in performing propensity score analysis, these errors must be minimized as much as possible or assessed using sensitivity analysis to ensure validity.

急症外科研究中的倾向评分分析:方法与陷阱。
摘要:评估干预措施因果效应的观察性研究存在指征(选择)偏倚,这种偏倚可能难以用传统的多变量技术消除。当适当指定时,倾向评分调整分析可以提供传统回归的优势,确保研究者明确评估治疗组和未治疗组之间基线预后因素的可比性。然而,重要的是要注意,倾向得分调整分析的有效性取决于为模型和分析方法选择的变量。事实上,不包括重要的预后因素和其他错误中的模型错误可能会增加偏倚;因此,在进行倾向评分分析时,必须尽可能地减少这些误差,或者使用敏感性分析来评估以确保有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信