C J Lalaurie, M Zloh, D R Higazi, K A Bunting, P A Dalby
{"title":"Inter-Domain interactions Slow BoNT/A's onset of action.","authors":"C J Lalaurie, M Zloh, D R Higazi, K A Bunting, P A Dalby","doi":"10.1016/j.jsb.2025.108171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite sharing ∼ 43 % sequence identity and structurally similar individual domains, botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) serotypes A and E have differences in their properties and domain positioning. BoNT/E has a faster onset of action than BoNT/A. This difference is proposed to be due to conformational differences between BoNT/E and the other BoNT serotypes. Where most serotypes have the light chain (LC) and binding domain (BD) on opposite sides of the translocation domain (TD), BoNT/E forms a more compact shape with direct interactions between residues of the LC and BD. To elucidate the structural basis for the different properties of BoNT/A and BoNT/E, biophysical studies including molecular dynamic (MD) simulations, circular dichroism (CD) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) were applied to BoNT/A, for comparison against previous work on BoNT/E. MD simulationsat six pH values across the toxin's activation barrier (pH ∼ 5.5), followed by one extra repeat for the pH values below 5.5, revealed a rare event at pH 5 and 5.5 where interactions between a previously identified switch region of BoNT/Aand the BD were lost.This hintedat an increased freedom of movement, thus allowing the region to change from α-helical to a β-hairpin. In good agreement with previous work, CD showed a gradual and small loss of helicity as the pH decreased below pH 5.5, stabilising at pH 4.5. Combined with the relative scarcity of structural changes observed by MD in the switch region required for activity, these results may explain the slower onset of action for BoNT/A compared to BoNT/E.</p>","PeriodicalId":17074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of structural biology","volume":" ","pages":"108171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of structural biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2025.108171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite sharing ∼ 43 % sequence identity and structurally similar individual domains, botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) serotypes A and E have differences in their properties and domain positioning. BoNT/E has a faster onset of action than BoNT/A. This difference is proposed to be due to conformational differences between BoNT/E and the other BoNT serotypes. Where most serotypes have the light chain (LC) and binding domain (BD) on opposite sides of the translocation domain (TD), BoNT/E forms a more compact shape with direct interactions between residues of the LC and BD. To elucidate the structural basis for the different properties of BoNT/A and BoNT/E, biophysical studies including molecular dynamic (MD) simulations, circular dichroism (CD) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) were applied to BoNT/A, for comparison against previous work on BoNT/E. MD simulationsat six pH values across the toxin's activation barrier (pH ∼ 5.5), followed by one extra repeat for the pH values below 5.5, revealed a rare event at pH 5 and 5.5 where interactions between a previously identified switch region of BoNT/Aand the BD were lost.This hintedat an increased freedom of movement, thus allowing the region to change from α-helical to a β-hairpin. In good agreement with previous work, CD showed a gradual and small loss of helicity as the pH decreased below pH 5.5, stabilising at pH 4.5. Combined with the relative scarcity of structural changes observed by MD in the switch region required for activity, these results may explain the slower onset of action for BoNT/A compared to BoNT/E.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Structural Biology (JSB) has an open access mirror journal, the Journal of Structural Biology: X (JSBX), sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Since both journals share the same editorial system, you may submit your manuscript via either journal homepage. You will be prompted during submission (and revision) to choose in which to publish your article. The editors and reviewers are not aware of the choice you made until the article has been published online. JSB and JSBX publish papers dealing with the structural analysis of living material at every level of organization by all methods that lead to an understanding of biological function in terms of molecular and supermolecular structure.
Techniques covered include:
• Light microscopy including confocal microscopy
• All types of electron microscopy
• X-ray diffraction
• Nuclear magnetic resonance
• Scanning force microscopy, scanning probe microscopy, and tunneling microscopy
• Digital image processing
• Computational insights into structure