Hounsfield unit values are a better predictor than DXA T-score for adjacent vertebral fracture following balloon kyphoplasty.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Koji Matsumoto, Masahiro Hoshino, Hirokatsu Sawada, Sosuke Saito, Tomohiro Furutya, Yuya Miyanaga, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi
{"title":"Hounsfield unit values are a better predictor than DXA T-score for adjacent vertebral fracture following balloon kyphoplasty.","authors":"Koji Matsumoto, Masahiro Hoshino, Hirokatsu Sawada, Sosuke Saito, Tomohiro Furutya, Yuya Miyanaga, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hounsfield unit values (HU) are known to correlate with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and they are gaining attention as a new method for assessing Bone mineral density (BMD) that is not affected by the limitations of DXA, such as degeneration, scoliosis, and vascular calcification. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of HU and DXA T-scores in predicting adjacent vertebral fractures (AVF) following balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) using the same computed tomography and DXA at one institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 84 cases (20 males, 64 females, mean age 79.3 ± 6.9) who underwent BKP for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Cases were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of AVF within 2 months postoperatively. BMD assessment included DXA T-scores (lumbar spine, hip, the lowest), HU of the fractured adjacent vertebra (adjacent-HU) and HU of the L1 vertebra (L1-HU). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for AVF, and the accuracy of AVF prediction was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AVF occurred in 23 of the 84 cases (27.4 %) within 2 months postoperatively. In the logistic regression analysis, T-score was not identified as an independent risk factor, but L1-HU was identified as an independent risk factor for AVF (odds ratio: 0.982, P = 0.044∗). The AUC for predicting AVF was 0.515, 0.568, and 0.510 for T-score (lumbar spine, hip, the lowest), and 0.551 for adjacent-HU. The highest AUC was observed for L1-HU at 0.629 (95 % confidence interval 0.495-0.764).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the risk assessment of AVF, L1-HU was a better evaluation method than DXA T-score.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.01.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hounsfield unit values (HU) are known to correlate with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and they are gaining attention as a new method for assessing Bone mineral density (BMD) that is not affected by the limitations of DXA, such as degeneration, scoliosis, and vascular calcification. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of HU and DXA T-scores in predicting adjacent vertebral fractures (AVF) following balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) using the same computed tomography and DXA at one institution.

Methods: The study included 84 cases (20 males, 64 females, mean age 79.3 ± 6.9) who underwent BKP for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Cases were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of AVF within 2 months postoperatively. BMD assessment included DXA T-scores (lumbar spine, hip, the lowest), HU of the fractured adjacent vertebra (adjacent-HU) and HU of the L1 vertebra (L1-HU). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for AVF, and the accuracy of AVF prediction was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).

Results: AVF occurred in 23 of the 84 cases (27.4 %) within 2 months postoperatively. In the logistic regression analysis, T-score was not identified as an independent risk factor, but L1-HU was identified as an independent risk factor for AVF (odds ratio: 0.982, P = 0.044∗). The AUC for predicting AVF was 0.515, 0.568, and 0.510 for T-score (lumbar spine, hip, the lowest), and 0.551 for adjacent-HU. The highest AUC was observed for L1-HU at 0.629 (95 % confidence interval 0.495-0.764).

Conclusions: In the risk assessment of AVF, L1-HU was a better evaluation method than DXA T-score.

Hounsfield单位值比DXA t评分更好地预测球囊后凸成形术后相邻椎体骨折。
背景:Hounsfield单位值(HU)与双能x线骨密度测定(DXA)相关,作为一种评估骨密度(BMD)的新方法正受到关注,该方法不受DXA局限性(如退变、脊柱侧凸和血管钙化)的影响。本研究的目的是比较HU和DXA t评分在同一机构使用相同的计算机断层扫描和DXA预测球囊后凸成形术(BKP)后邻近椎体骨折(AVF)的疗效。方法:84例骨质疏松性椎体骨折行BKP治疗,男20例,女64例,平均年龄79.3±6.9岁。根据术后2个月内AVF的存在与否分为两组。BMD评估包括DXA t评分(腰椎、髋关节最低)、骨折邻椎HU (adjacent-HU)和L1椎HU (L1-HU)。采用Logistic回归分析确定AVF的危险因素,并采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评价AVF预测的准确性。结果:84例患者中有23例(27.4%)在术后2个月内发生AVF。在logistic回归分析中,t评分未被确定为AVF的独立危险因素,但L1-HU被确定为AVF的独立危险因素(优势比:0.982,P = 0.044 *)。t评分(腰椎、髋关节最低)预测AVF的AUC分别为0.515、0.568和0.510,邻接hu的AUC为0.551。L1-HU的最高AUC为0.629(95%置信区间为0.495-0.764)。结论:在AVF的风险评价中,L1-HU是优于DXA t评分的评价方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信