Michael D Cobler-Lichter, Jessica M Delamater, Nicole B Lyons, Brianna L Collie, Jonathan P Meizoso, Louis R Pizano, Kenneth G Proctor, Nicholas Namias, Nicholas H Carter
{"title":"Liver Injury as a Risk Factor for Post-traumatic Venous Thromboembolism.","authors":"Michael D Cobler-Lichter, Jessica M Delamater, Nicole B Lyons, Brianna L Collie, Jonathan P Meizoso, Louis R Pizano, Kenneth G Proctor, Nicholas Namias, Nicholas H Carter","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in severely injured patients despite current methods of risk stratification and prophylaxis, suggesting incomplete understanding of VTE risk factors. Given the liver's role in coagulation, we hypothesized that liver injury (LI) is associated with increased rates of VTE in severely injured patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The American College of Surgeons TQIP 2017 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed for patients with a maximum abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score 4 or more with or without LI. Transfers, burns, all kinds of death, and patients younger than 18 years of age were excluded. Logistic regression was performed to assess the independent effect of LI on development of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) while controlling for potential confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 44,506 patients, there were 1,736 (3.9%), 890 (2.0%), and 18,642 (41.9%) with DVT, PE, and LI, respectively. After controlling for potential confounders, LI was independently associated with PE (adjusted odds ratio 1.279, 95% CI 1.088 to 1.504) but was not associated with DVT (adjusted odds ratio 1.011, 95% CI 0.897 to 1.140).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In severely injured patients, LI is an independent predictor of PE, but not DVT, suggesting that LI is the source of either emboli or a more complex locally prothrombotic focus leading to downstream thrombi in the lung without causing upstream systemic venous thrombi. Further work should focus on elucidation of mechanisms including the portal venous blood coagulation profile, endothelial injury in the liver, and the potential for stasis of venous blood traversing an injured liver as well as the role for including LI in VTE risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"660-666"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in severely injured patients despite current methods of risk stratification and prophylaxis, suggesting incomplete understanding of VTE risk factors. Given the liver's role in coagulation, we hypothesized that liver injury (LI) is associated with increased rates of VTE in severely injured patients.
Study design: The American College of Surgeons TQIP 2017 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed for patients with a maximum abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score 4 or more with or without LI. Transfers, burns, all kinds of death, and patients younger than 18 years of age were excluded. Logistic regression was performed to assess the independent effect of LI on development of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) while controlling for potential confounding variables.
Results: Of 44,506 patients, there were 1,736 (3.9%), 890 (2.0%), and 18,642 (41.9%) with DVT, PE, and LI, respectively. After controlling for potential confounders, LI was independently associated with PE (adjusted odds ratio 1.279, 95% CI 1.088 to 1.504) but was not associated with DVT (adjusted odds ratio 1.011, 95% CI 0.897 to 1.140).
Conclusions: In severely injured patients, LI is an independent predictor of PE, but not DVT, suggesting that LI is the source of either emboli or a more complex locally prothrombotic focus leading to downstream thrombi in the lung without causing upstream systemic venous thrombi. Further work should focus on elucidation of mechanisms including the portal venous blood coagulation profile, endothelial injury in the liver, and the potential for stasis of venous blood traversing an injured liver as well as the role for including LI in VTE risk stratification.
背景:尽管目前的危险分层和预防方法,静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)仍然是严重损伤患者发病率和死亡率的主要来源,表明对VTE危险因素的了解不完全。鉴于肝脏在凝血中的作用,我们假设肝损伤(LI)与严重损伤患者静脉血栓栓塞发生率增加有关。研究设计:回顾性分析2017-2021年美国外科医师学会创伤质量改善项目数据库(TQIP)中伴有或不伴有LI的最大腹部缩短损伤评分(AIS)≥4的患者。排除转移、烧伤、所有死亡和年龄< 18岁的患者。在控制潜在的混杂变量的同时,采用Logistic回归来评估LI对肺栓塞(PE)和深静脉血栓形成(DVT)发展的独立影响。结果:44506例患者中,DVT患者1736例(3.9%),PE患者890例(2.0%),LI患者18642例(41.9%)。在控制了潜在混杂因素后,LI与PE独立相关(aOR为1.279 [95% CI 1.088-1.504]),但与DVT无关(aOR为1.011 [95% CI 0.897-1.140])。结论:在严重损伤患者中,LI是PE的独立预测因子,而不是DVT,这表明LI是栓塞的来源或更复杂的局部血栓原灶,导致肺部下游血栓,而不会引起上游全身静脉血栓。进一步的工作应该集中在阐明包括门静脉血液凝固谱、肝脏内皮损伤、静脉血穿越损伤肝脏的潜在停滞在内的机制,以及将LI纳入静脉血栓栓塞风险分层的作用。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.