Carlos Ernesto Marrero Eligio De La Puente, David Flota Ruiz, Lluis Sánchez Besalduch, Xavier Faner Capó, Daniel Gil Sala, Clara Palmada Ibars, Ivan Bajaña Mindiolaza, Luis Silvestre Chiscano Camon, Adolfo Ruiz Sanmartin, Juan Carlos Ruiz-Rodríguez, Ricard Ferrer, Sergi Bellmunt Montoya
{"title":"Systematic Ultrasound Screening for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in ICU Patients with Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Carlos Ernesto Marrero Eligio De La Puente, David Flota Ruiz, Lluis Sánchez Besalduch, Xavier Faner Capó, Daniel Gil Sala, Clara Palmada Ibars, Ivan Bajaña Mindiolaza, Luis Silvestre Chiscano Camon, Adolfo Ruiz Sanmartin, Juan Carlos Ruiz-Rodríguez, Ricard Ferrer, Sergi Bellmunt Montoya","doi":"10.1177/08850666251313774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE), whether pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is common in patients with COVID-19. Recommendations on systematic screening in the intensive care unit (ICU) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Is there any clinical benefit of systematic screening for DVT in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Single-center randomized clinical trial (RCT) of COVID-19 cases admitted to the ICU. Patients were randomized into two groups: a study group that underwent ultrasound (US) screening for DVT Mondays and Thursdays, and a control group that was treated according to the unit protocol. The primary outcome was the presence of DVT. Secondary outcomes were ICU total stay, death within 21-day follow-up and bleeding complications (minor or major). A composite outcome of poor prognosis variables was analyzed. We tested a superiority hypothesis with a confidence level of 95% and an equivalence limit of 20%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>163 patients (84 screening group, 79 control group) were enrolled between April and July 2021. There were 90 men (55.2%) with a mean ± SD age of 49.8 ± 13.58 years. In screening group 16.7% developed DVT versus 3.8% in control group (p = .007), and 3.6% versus 5.1% developed PE, respectively (p = 0.7). Poor outcome variables were male sex, age, COVID-19 vaccination status, Fibrinogen, Urea, Creatinine and Interleukin 6 (IL6) levels; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scales. The superiority comparison, with a power of 95%, showed no statistically significant differences for a composite endpoint (p = .123). After adjusting by group, the OR for poor outcome is 1.966 (0.761-5.081) p = 0.163.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among these patients, a strategy of systematic US screening for DVT was not associated with any significant improvements to clinical outcomes compared with usual care.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.org registration number: NCT05028244.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251313774"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251313774","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), whether pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is common in patients with COVID-19. Recommendations on systematic screening in the intensive care unit (ICU) are lacking.
Research question: Is there any clinical benefit of systematic screening for DVT in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19?
Study design and methods: Single-center randomized clinical trial (RCT) of COVID-19 cases admitted to the ICU. Patients were randomized into two groups: a study group that underwent ultrasound (US) screening for DVT Mondays and Thursdays, and a control group that was treated according to the unit protocol. The primary outcome was the presence of DVT. Secondary outcomes were ICU total stay, death within 21-day follow-up and bleeding complications (minor or major). A composite outcome of poor prognosis variables was analyzed. We tested a superiority hypothesis with a confidence level of 95% and an equivalence limit of 20%.
Results: 163 patients (84 screening group, 79 control group) were enrolled between April and July 2021. There were 90 men (55.2%) with a mean ± SD age of 49.8 ± 13.58 years. In screening group 16.7% developed DVT versus 3.8% in control group (p = .007), and 3.6% versus 5.1% developed PE, respectively (p = 0.7). Poor outcome variables were male sex, age, COVID-19 vaccination status, Fibrinogen, Urea, Creatinine and Interleukin 6 (IL6) levels; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scales. The superiority comparison, with a power of 95%, showed no statistically significant differences for a composite endpoint (p = .123). After adjusting by group, the OR for poor outcome is 1.966 (0.761-5.081) p = 0.163.
Interpretation: Among these patients, a strategy of systematic US screening for DVT was not associated with any significant improvements to clinical outcomes compared with usual care.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.