Comparing demographic/clinical characteristics, health care resource utilization, and costs among patients with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with and without the use of cardioprotective medications.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tyler J Dunn, Yiwen Cao, Lin Xie, Mico Guevarra, Joanna Mitri
{"title":"Comparing demographic/clinical characteristics, health care resource utilization, and costs among patients with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with and without the use of cardioprotective medications.","authors":"Tyler J Dunn, Yiwen Cao, Lin Xie, Mico Guevarra, Joanna Mitri","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.24251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) causes increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in the United States. People with T2D are more likely to have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Medical associations recommend cardioprotective antidiabetic medications, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with T2D with established, or a high risk of, ASCVD, but not all eligible patients receive these medications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe demographic/clinical characteristics and antidiabetic medication prescription patterns and compare HCRU and costs among patients with T2D and ASCVD with or without SGLT2i and/or GLP-1 RA use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Merative MarketScan database of longitudinal US health care claims data with patients enrolled from July 1, 2014, to December 31, 2022. Patients with T2D and ASCVD receiving SGLT2is and/or GLP-1 RAs (case cohort) were compared with patients with T2D and ASCVD not receiving SGLT2is and/or GLP-1 RAs (control cohort) during a 12-month baseline period pre-index and a 12-month follow-up period post-index. The index date was SGLT2i/GLP-1 RA prescription for the case cohort and random health care visit for the control cohort. Baseline patient characteristics are reported before propensity score matching (PSM); HCRU and medical costs are reported after PSM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before PSM, each cohort included 3,386 patients; after PSM, each cohort included 2,351 patients. Patients in the case cohort were significantly more likely to experience myocardial infarction (case, 26.2%; control, 21.5%; <i>P</i> < 0.001) or peripheral artery disease (case, 28.6%; control, 26.1%; <i>P</i> < 0.024) during the baseline period. Patients in the case cohort had significantly lower baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index scores than patients in the control cohort (case, 1.8; control, 2.1; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients in the case cohort had significantly fewer all-cause inpatient visits per patient (case, 0.4; control, 0.6; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and all-cause emergency department visits per patient (case, 0.9; control, 1.0; <i>P</i> = 0.024). Patients in the case cohort had significantly lower all-cause inpatient costs (case, $13,977; control, $22,056; <i>P</i> < 0.001), other all-cause outpatient costs (case, $16,504; control, $24,739; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and all-cause total medical costs including pharmacy costs (case, $51,143; control, $58,648; <i>P</i> = 0.01) in the 12-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with T2D and ASCVD receiving SGLT2is and/or GLP-1 RAs within 12 months of ASCVD diagnosis may benefit from lower HCRU and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.24251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) causes increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in the United States. People with T2D are more likely to have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Medical associations recommend cardioprotective antidiabetic medications, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with T2D with established, or a high risk of, ASCVD, but not all eligible patients receive these medications.

Objective: To describe demographic/clinical characteristics and antidiabetic medication prescription patterns and compare HCRU and costs among patients with T2D and ASCVD with or without SGLT2i and/or GLP-1 RA use.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Merative MarketScan database of longitudinal US health care claims data with patients enrolled from July 1, 2014, to December 31, 2022. Patients with T2D and ASCVD receiving SGLT2is and/or GLP-1 RAs (case cohort) were compared with patients with T2D and ASCVD not receiving SGLT2is and/or GLP-1 RAs (control cohort) during a 12-month baseline period pre-index and a 12-month follow-up period post-index. The index date was SGLT2i/GLP-1 RA prescription for the case cohort and random health care visit for the control cohort. Baseline patient characteristics are reported before propensity score matching (PSM); HCRU and medical costs are reported after PSM.

Results: Before PSM, each cohort included 3,386 patients; after PSM, each cohort included 2,351 patients. Patients in the case cohort were significantly more likely to experience myocardial infarction (case, 26.2%; control, 21.5%; P < 0.001) or peripheral artery disease (case, 28.6%; control, 26.1%; P < 0.024) during the baseline period. Patients in the case cohort had significantly lower baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index scores than patients in the control cohort (case, 1.8; control, 2.1; P < 0.001). Patients in the case cohort had significantly fewer all-cause inpatient visits per patient (case, 0.4; control, 0.6; P < 0.001) and all-cause emergency department visits per patient (case, 0.9; control, 1.0; P = 0.024). Patients in the case cohort had significantly lower all-cause inpatient costs (case, $13,977; control, $22,056; P < 0.001), other all-cause outpatient costs (case, $16,504; control, $24,739; P < 0.001), and all-cause total medical costs including pharmacy costs (case, $51,143; control, $58,648; P = 0.01) in the 12-month follow-up period.

Conclusions: Patients with T2D and ASCVD receiving SGLT2is and/or GLP-1 RAs within 12 months of ASCVD diagnosis may benefit from lower HCRU and costs.

比较2型糖尿病和已确诊的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者在使用和不使用心脏保护药物时的人口学/临床特征、卫生保健资源利用和成本
背景:在美国,2型糖尿病(T2D)导致卫生保健资源利用率(HCRU)和成本增加。T2D患者更容易发生动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD),这与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。医学协会推荐心脏保护降糖药物,包括钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2is)和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs),以降低已确定或高风险ASCVD的T2D患者心血管事件的风险,但并非所有符合条件的患者都接受这些药物。目的:描述人口统计学/临床特征和降糖药物处方模式,比较使用或不使用SGLT2i和/或GLP-1 RA的T2D和ASCVD患者的HCRU和成本。方法:我们使用Merative MarketScan数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究,该数据库收集了2014年7月1日至2022年12月31日期间入组的患者的纵向美国医疗保健索赔数据。接受SGLT2is和/或GLP-1 RAs治疗的T2D和ASCVD患者(病例队列)与未接受SGLT2is和/或GLP-1 RAs治疗的T2D和ASCVD患者(对照队列)在指数前12个月的基线期和指数后12个月的随访期进行比较。索引日期为病例组的SGLT2i/GLP-1 RA处方和对照组的随机卫生保健访问。在倾向评分匹配(PSM)之前报告基线患者特征;HCRU和医疗费用在PSM后报告。结果:PSM前,每个队列包括3386例患者;PSM后,每个队列包括2351名患者。病例组患者发生心肌梗死的可能性显著增加(病例,26.2%;控制,21.5%;P < 0.001)或外周动脉疾病(例,28.6%;控制,26.1%;P < 0.024)。病例队列患者的基线Charlson合并症指数评分明显低于对照组(病例,1.8;控制,2.1;P < 0.001)。病例队列患者的全因住院就诊次数显著少于每位患者(病例0.4;控制,0.6;P < 0.001)和每名患者的全因急诊就诊次数(例,0.9;控制,1.0;P = 0.024)。病例队列患者的全因住院费用显著降低(1例,13,977美元;控制,22056美元;P < 0.001),其他全因门诊费用(1例,16504美元;控制,24739美元;P < 0.001),包括药费在内的全因总医疗费用(病例,51,143美元;控制,58648美元;P = 0.01),随访12个月。结论:在ASCVD诊断后12个月内接受SGLT2is和/或GLP-1 RAs治疗的T2D和ASCVD患者可能受益于较低的HCRU和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信