Assessment of adverse events stratified by timing of leadless pacemaker implantation with cardiac implantable electronic devices extraction due to infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Naoya Inoue MD, Yuji Ito MD, Takahiro Imaizumi MD, Shuji Morikawa MD, Toyoaki Murohara MD, PhD
{"title":"Assessment of adverse events stratified by timing of leadless pacemaker implantation with cardiac implantable electronic devices extraction due to infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Naoya Inoue MD,&nbsp;Yuji Ito MD,&nbsp;Takahiro Imaizumi MD,&nbsp;Shuji Morikawa MD,&nbsp;Toyoaki Murohara MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Removal of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is strongly recommended for CIED-related infections, and leadless pacemakers (LPs) are increasingly used for reimplantation. However, the optimal timing and safety of LP implantation after CIED removal for infection remains unclear.</p>\n \n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess complication rates (all-cause mortality and reinfection) when LP implantation was performed simultaneously with or after CIED removal.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Studies published from 2015 to September 2024 were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Observational studies and case series on CIED removal and LP implantation were eligible. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and reinfection post-LP implantation. Pooled estimates were obtained using the Freedman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria, with data extraction and independent assessment by two authors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 396 records, 16 studies were included in the analysis, with 653 patients (mean age:76.9 years). The incidence of isolated pocket infections was 46.7% (95% CI: 32.7%–61.2%) and systemic infections at 46.3% (95% CI: 29.5%–64.0%). The primary outcome incidence was 19.4% (95% CI: 12.8%–28.3%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 0%) for simultaneous CIED extraction and LP implantation compared with 7.79% (4.37%–13.5%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 4%) for LP implantation after CIED extraction (<i>p</i> = .009). All-cause mortality rates were 22.8% (95% CI: 15.9%–31.6%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 0%) for simultaneous implantation and 8.71% (4.46%–16.3%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>: 21%) after extraction (<i>p</i> = 0.008). Reinfection was not observed in any of these studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Simultaneous CIED extraction and LP implantation due to infection may be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Removal of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is strongly recommended for CIED-related infections, and leadless pacemakers (LPs) are increasingly used for reimplantation. However, the optimal timing and safety of LP implantation after CIED removal for infection remains unclear.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess complication rates (all-cause mortality and reinfection) when LP implantation was performed simultaneously with or after CIED removal.

Methods

Studies published from 2015 to September 2024 were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Observational studies and case series on CIED removal and LP implantation were eligible. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and reinfection post-LP implantation. Pooled estimates were obtained using the Freedman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS criteria, with data extraction and independent assessment by two authors.

Results

Of 396 records, 16 studies were included in the analysis, with 653 patients (mean age:76.9 years). The incidence of isolated pocket infections was 46.7% (95% CI: 32.7%–61.2%) and systemic infections at 46.3% (95% CI: 29.5%–64.0%). The primary outcome incidence was 19.4% (95% CI: 12.8%–28.3%, I2: 0%) for simultaneous CIED extraction and LP implantation compared with 7.79% (4.37%–13.5%, I2: 4%) for LP implantation after CIED extraction (p = .009). All-cause mortality rates were 22.8% (95% CI: 15.9%–31.6%, I2: 0%) for simultaneous implantation and 8.71% (4.46%–16.3%, I2: 21%) after extraction (p = 0.008). Reinfection was not observed in any of these studies.

Conclusion

Simultaneous CIED extraction and LP implantation due to infection may be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality.

Abstract Image

评估无导联起搏器植入与心脏植入式电子装置因感染拔出的时间分层不良事件:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:对于心脏植入式电子装置(cied)相关感染,强烈建议移除植入式电子装置(cied),无铅起搏器(LPs)越来越多地用于再植入式心脏起搏器。然而,CIED切除感染后LP植入的最佳时机和安全性仍不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估LP植入与CIED移除同时或之后的并发症发生率(全因死亡率和再感染)。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar中2015 - 2024年9月发表的研究。关于CIED移除和LP植入的观察性研究和病例系列是合格的。主要结局是全因死亡率和lp植入后再感染。利用Freedman-Tukey二重反正弦变换得到混合估计。采用未成年人标准评估研究质量,由两位作者进行数据提取和独立评估。结果:在396份记录中,16项研究纳入分析,653例患者(平均年龄:76.9岁)。孤立性口袋感染发生率为46.7% (95% CI: 32.7% ~ 61.2%),全身性感染发生率为46.3% (95% CI: 29.5% ~ 64.0%)。CIED拔牙同时植入LP的主要结局发生率为19.4% (95% CI: 12.8%-28.3%, i2.0%),而CIED拔牙后植入LP的主要结局发生率为7.79% (4.37%-13.5%,i2.4%) (p = 0.009)。同期种植的全因死亡率为22.8% (95% CI: 15.9% ~ 31.6%, i2:0 %),拔牙后的全因死亡率为8.71% (4.46% ~ 16.3%,i2:21 %) (p = 0.008)。在这些研究中均未观察到再感染。结论:因感染而同时进行CIED拔除和LP植入可能与全因死亡风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信