Disparities in Cancer Mortality Worldwide: A Novel Metric for Measuring Global Disparities and Prioritizing Cancer Control Efforts.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1200/GO-24-00336
Thomas M Diehl, Kaleem S Ahmed, Sheida Pourdashti, Lily Stalter, Jessica Hellner, Ewen M Harrison, Syed Nabeel Zafar
{"title":"Disparities in Cancer Mortality Worldwide: A Novel Metric for Measuring Global Disparities and Prioritizing Cancer Control Efforts.","authors":"Thomas M Diehl, Kaleem S Ahmed, Sheida Pourdashti, Lily Stalter, Jessica Hellner, Ewen M Harrison, Syed Nabeel Zafar","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cancer incidence is rising worldwide and estimated to double by 2040. A systematic method of allocating resources and prioritizing cancer control efforts is needed. We aimed to develop and test a simple metric to quantify disparities in cancer mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted country-specific incidence and mortality rates for 33 cancers from 185 countries using data from Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) 2020. Mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs) were calculated for each cancer in every country. Delta MIRs (dMIRs) were calculated as the difference between a country's MIR and the MIR of the highest performing country for each cancer. dMIR was validated against human development index (HDI), gender development index (GDI), and life expectancy index (LEI) using scatter plots, correlation coefficients, and linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 185 countries in the GLOBOCAN 2020 data set, mortality and incidence estimates were available for 54 high-income, 47 upper-middle-income, 54 lower-middle-income, and 27 low-income countries. The United States was the highest performing country for 10 of the 33 cancer subtypes, and South Korea was the highest performing country for eight cancer subtypes. Significant variation in dMIR was observed across the globe. The highest dMIRs were in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, and the lowest dMIRs were in North America, Western Europe, and Australasia. dMIR showed strong correlations with HDI, GDI, and LEI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, dMIR is a novel and robust metric that can be used to track disparities in global cancer mortality and prioritize cancer control initiatives. We benchmarked cancer care performance for 33 cancers across 182 countries and provide country- and cancer-specific priority lists.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400336"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer incidence is rising worldwide and estimated to double by 2040. A systematic method of allocating resources and prioritizing cancer control efforts is needed. We aimed to develop and test a simple metric to quantify disparities in cancer mortality.

Methods: We extracted country-specific incidence and mortality rates for 33 cancers from 185 countries using data from Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) 2020. Mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs) were calculated for each cancer in every country. Delta MIRs (dMIRs) were calculated as the difference between a country's MIR and the MIR of the highest performing country for each cancer. dMIR was validated against human development index (HDI), gender development index (GDI), and life expectancy index (LEI) using scatter plots, correlation coefficients, and linear regression.

Results: Among 185 countries in the GLOBOCAN 2020 data set, mortality and incidence estimates were available for 54 high-income, 47 upper-middle-income, 54 lower-middle-income, and 27 low-income countries. The United States was the highest performing country for 10 of the 33 cancer subtypes, and South Korea was the highest performing country for eight cancer subtypes. Significant variation in dMIR was observed across the globe. The highest dMIRs were in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, and the lowest dMIRs were in North America, Western Europe, and Australasia. dMIR showed strong correlations with HDI, GDI, and LEI.

Conclusion: In conclusion, dMIR is a novel and robust metric that can be used to track disparities in global cancer mortality and prioritize cancer control initiatives. We benchmarked cancer care performance for 33 cancers across 182 countries and provide country- and cancer-specific priority lists.

全球癌症死亡率的差异:衡量全球差异和优先考虑癌症控制工作的新指标。
目的:全球癌症发病率正在上升,预计到2040年将翻一番。需要一种分配资源和确定癌症控制工作优先次序的系统方法。我们的目标是开发和测试一个简单的指标来量化癌症死亡率的差异。方法:我们使用全球癌症观察站(GLOBOCAN) 2020的数据提取了来自185个国家的33种癌症的国别发病率和死亡率。计算了每个国家每种癌症的死亡率与发病率比(MIRs)。Delta MIRs (dMIRs)是根据一个国家的MIR与每种癌症表现最好的国家的MIR之间的差异计算的。采用散点图、相关系数和线性回归,对照人类发展指数(HDI)、性别发展指数(GDI)和预期寿命指数(LEI)验证dMIR。结果:在GLOBOCAN 2020数据集中的185个国家中,可获得54个高收入国家、47个中高收入国家、54个中低收入国家和27个低收入国家的死亡率和发病率估计数。美国在33种癌症中有10种表现最好,韩国在8种癌症中表现最好。在全球范围内观察到dMIR的显著差异。dmir最高的是撒哈拉以南非洲和东南亚,最低的是北美、西欧和澳大拉西亚。dMIR与HDI、GDI、LEI有较强的相关性。结论:总之,dMIR是一种新颖而稳健的指标,可用于跟踪全球癌症死亡率的差异,并优先考虑癌症控制措施。我们对182个国家的33种癌症的癌症护理绩效进行了基准测试,并提供了国家和特定癌症的优先清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信