Travel Time as an Indicator of Poor Access to Care in Surgical Emergencies.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nina M Clark, Alexandra H Hernandez, Mia S Bertalan, Virginia Wang, Sarah L M Greenberg, Andrew M Ibrahim, Barclay T Stewart, John W Scott
{"title":"Travel Time as an Indicator of Poor Access to Care in Surgical Emergencies.","authors":"Nina M Clark, Alexandra H Hernandez, Mia S Bertalan, Virginia Wang, Sarah L M Greenberg, Andrew M Ibrahim, Barclay T Stewart, John W Scott","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Timely access to care is a key metric for health care systems and is particularly important in conditions that acutely worsen with delays in care, including surgical emergencies. However, the association between travel time to emergency care and risk for complex presentation is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of travel time on disease complexity at presentation among people with emergency general surgery conditions and to evaluate whether travel time was associated with clinical outcomes and measures of increased health resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used administrative statewide inpatient and emergency department databases with linkage across encounters, including nearly every inpatient or emergency department encounter in the states of Florida and California in 2021. Participants included adult patients who presented to an emergency department with 1 of 5 common emergency surgical conditions. Data were collected from January to December 2021 and analyzed from June to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The primary exposure was travel time from the patient's home to the facility where they initially received emergency care.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome of interest was surgical disease complexity at the time of presentation to emergency care. Secondary outcomes included inpatient complications, mortality, and indicators of health system resource utilization. Multivariable logistic regression models were used, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 190 311 adults with emergency general surgery conditions, 7138 (3.8%) lived further than 60 minutes from the facility where they sought emergency care. Longer travel times were associated with higher odds of complex disease presentation for travel time of more than 120 minutes vs 15 minutes or less (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40). Patients with a travel time 60 minutes or more were more likely to require operative intervention (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.26), inpatient admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.33-1.50), interfacility transfer (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.51), and longer inpatient stay (adjusted mean difference, 0.47 days; 95% CI, 0.35-0.59), and had higher charges (adjusted mean difference, $8284; 95% CI, $5532-$11 035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of patients with emergency surgical conditions, travel time to emergency care was associated with markers of delayed presentation and increased facility resource utilization. As opposed to static measures, such as rurality, travel time may serve as a more useful metric to inform policy efforts aimed at preserving access to care amidst rural hospital closures and regionalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2455258"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55258","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Timely access to care is a key metric for health care systems and is particularly important in conditions that acutely worsen with delays in care, including surgical emergencies. However, the association between travel time to emergency care and risk for complex presentation is poorly understood.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of travel time on disease complexity at presentation among people with emergency general surgery conditions and to evaluate whether travel time was associated with clinical outcomes and measures of increased health resource utilization.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used administrative statewide inpatient and emergency department databases with linkage across encounters, including nearly every inpatient or emergency department encounter in the states of Florida and California in 2021. Participants included adult patients who presented to an emergency department with 1 of 5 common emergency surgical conditions. Data were collected from January to December 2021 and analyzed from June to December 2023.

Exposure: The primary exposure was travel time from the patient's home to the facility where they initially received emergency care.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome of interest was surgical disease complexity at the time of presentation to emergency care. Secondary outcomes included inpatient complications, mortality, and indicators of health system resource utilization. Multivariable logistic regression models were used, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs were reported.

Results: Among 190 311 adults with emergency general surgery conditions, 7138 (3.8%) lived further than 60 minutes from the facility where they sought emergency care. Longer travel times were associated with higher odds of complex disease presentation for travel time of more than 120 minutes vs 15 minutes or less (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40). Patients with a travel time 60 minutes or more were more likely to require operative intervention (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.26), inpatient admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.33-1.50), interfacility transfer (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15-1.51), and longer inpatient stay (adjusted mean difference, 0.47 days; 95% CI, 0.35-0.59), and had higher charges (adjusted mean difference, $8284; 95% CI, $5532-$11 035).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with emergency surgical conditions, travel time to emergency care was associated with markers of delayed presentation and increased facility resource utilization. As opposed to static measures, such as rurality, travel time may serve as a more useful metric to inform policy efforts aimed at preserving access to care amidst rural hospital closures and regionalization.

旅行时间作为外科急诊中难以获得护理的指标。
重要性:及时获得护理是卫生保健系统的一项关键指标,在因护理延误而严重恶化的情况下(包括外科急诊)尤为重要。然而,前往急救中心的旅行时间与复杂症状风险之间的关系尚不清楚。目的:评估急诊普通外科患者就诊时出行时间对疾病复杂性的影响,并评估出行时间是否与临床结果和提高卫生资源利用率的措施相关。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了全州住院和急诊科的行政数据库,其中包括2021年佛罗里达州和加利福尼亚州几乎所有住院或急诊科的病例。参与者包括以5种常见急诊手术条件中的1种到急诊科就诊的成年患者。数据收集于2021年1月至12月,分析于2023年6月至12月。接触:主要接触是从患者家中到他们最初接受紧急护理的机构的旅行时间。主要结局和措施:主要结局是在急诊护理时的外科疾病复杂性。次要结局包括住院并发症、死亡率和卫生系统资源利用指标。采用多变量logistic回归模型,并报道校正优势比(aOR)和95% ci。结果:在190 311名急诊普通外科患者中,7138人(3.8%)的住所距离他们寻求急诊护理的机构超过60分钟。较长的旅行时间与超过120分钟的旅行时间比15分钟或更短的旅行时间出现复杂疾病的几率更高(aOR, 1.28;95% ci, 1.17-1.40)。旅行时间为60分钟或更长时间的患者更有可能需要手术干预(aOR, 1.17;95% CI, 1.10-1.26),住院率(aOR, 1.41;95% CI, 1.33-1.50),设施间转移(aOR, 1.32;95% CI, 1.15-1.51)和更长的住院时间(调整后的平均差值,0.47天;95% CI, 0.35-0.59),且收费较高(调整后的平均差异为8284美元;95% ci, $5532-$11 035)。结论和相关性:在这项对急诊手术患者的队列研究中,前往急诊护理的时间与延迟就诊和增加的设施资源利用率相关。与乡村性等静态措施不同,旅行时间可以作为一种更有用的衡量标准,为旨在在农村医院关闭和区域化的情况下保持获得医疗服务的政策努力提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信