A minimum dataset for destination therapy with left ventricular assist device: the evidence that matters to decision makers.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Janet Puñal-Riobóo, Maria José Faraldo Vallés, Natalia Nogueira Uzal, Hannah Patrick, Leonor Varela-Lema
{"title":"A minimum dataset for destination therapy with left ventricular assist device: the evidence that matters to decision makers.","authors":"Janet Puñal-Riobóo, Maria José Faraldo Vallés, Natalia Nogueira Uzal, Hannah Patrick, Leonor Varela-Lema","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325000054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a therapeutic option in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) not a candidate for cardiac transplant as destination therapy (DT). However, important uncertainties remain regarding the use of LVAD in the long-term in real practice settings. When planning registries, it is important to choose the appropriate outcomes that ensure comparability and reduce the possibility of bias.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study was to establish a minimum dataset (MDS) that should be collected in all LVAD for DT registries to meet the needs and demands of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) doers and health professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To design the MDS for LVAD, a preliminary list of outcome domains and data items were developed attending to the gaps and research needs derived from existing evidence coming from HTA carried out at the European Network of Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) level. The list of data items and domains was agreed upon by all involved HTA organizations and a three-round Delphi was conducted among an experienced panel of cardiologists to rate the importance of the items for measuring uncertainty gaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the three-round Delphi process, the expert panel reached a consensus regarding eighteen outcomes and forty-seven variables divided into seven main domains (safety, effectiveness, patient acceptability, satisfaction, healthcare system impact, pharmaceutical management, and technique-related factors).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MDS of outcomes and measures, developed based on research gaps and needs, can allow for standardizing data collection and improving the quality of data for decision making and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325000054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a therapeutic option in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) not a candidate for cardiac transplant as destination therapy (DT). However, important uncertainties remain regarding the use of LVAD in the long-term in real practice settings. When planning registries, it is important to choose the appropriate outcomes that ensure comparability and reduce the possibility of bias.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to establish a minimum dataset (MDS) that should be collected in all LVAD for DT registries to meet the needs and demands of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) doers and health professionals.

Methods: To design the MDS for LVAD, a preliminary list of outcome domains and data items were developed attending to the gaps and research needs derived from existing evidence coming from HTA carried out at the European Network of Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) level. The list of data items and domains was agreed upon by all involved HTA organizations and a three-round Delphi was conducted among an experienced panel of cardiologists to rate the importance of the items for measuring uncertainty gaps.

Results: After the three-round Delphi process, the expert panel reached a consensus regarding eighteen outcomes and forty-seven variables divided into seven main domains (safety, effectiveness, patient acceptability, satisfaction, healthcare system impact, pharmaceutical management, and technique-related factors).

Conclusions: The MDS of outcomes and measures, developed based on research gaps and needs, can allow for standardizing data collection and improving the quality of data for decision making and practice.

目的治疗左心室辅助装置的最小数据集:对决策者重要的证据。
背景:左心室辅助装置(LVAD)是晚期心力衰竭(HF)患者的一种治疗选择,而不是心脏移植作为目的治疗(DT)的候选。然而,对于LVAD在实际环境中的长期使用,仍然存在重要的不确定性。在计划注册时,选择适当的结果以确保可比性并减少偏倚的可能性是很重要的。目的:本研究的目的是建立一个最低数据集(MDS),以满足卫生技术评估(HTA)实干家和卫生专业人员的需求。方法:为了设计LVAD的MDS,根据欧洲卫生技术评估网络(EUnetHTA)水平的HTA现有证据的差距和研究需求,制定了初步的结果域和数据项列表。数据项目和领域列表由所有相关的HTA组织商定,并在一个经验丰富的心脏病专家小组中进行了三轮德尔菲,以评估项目对测量不确定性差距的重要性。结果:经过三轮德尔菲过程,专家组就18个结果和47个变量达成共识,这些变量分为7个主要领域(安全性,有效性,患者可接受性,满意度,医疗保健系统影响,药品管理和技术相关因素)。结论:根据研究差距和需求制定的结果和措施MDS可以使数据收集标准化,并提高决策和实践的数据质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信