Case management in emergency care: impact evaluation of the CARED Program.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Colin Eng Choon Ong, Joanne Yan Ting Yap, Kamala Velu, Christine Xia Wu, Adrian Ujin Yap, Kai Xin Ng, Michael Yat Sen Chu, Yock Young Dan, Peng Hui Choa, Phillip Hin Choi Phan
{"title":"Case management in emergency care: impact evaluation of the CARED Program.","authors":"Colin Eng Choon Ong, Joanne Yan Ting Yap, Kamala Velu, Christine Xia Wu, Adrian Ujin Yap, Kai Xin Ng, Michael Yat Sen Chu, Yock Young Dan, Peng Hui Choa, Phillip Hin Choi Phan","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitals face mounting pressure to reduce unplanned utilization amid rising healthcare demands from an aging population. The Case management for At-Risk patients in the Emergency Department (CARED) program is among the first ED transitional care strategies to focus on both frail older adults and emergency department (ED) re-attenders to reduce acute hospital utilization. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the CARED program in reducing hospital (re)admissions and ED re-attendances within 30- and 60 days post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, propensity-matched study was conducted from April 2022 to July 2023 in the ED of Ng Teng Fong General Hospital in Singapore. The CARED program identifies and enrols at-risk patients, i.e. frail older adults and patients who re-attend the ED within 30 days of hospital discharge, for a geriatric assessment. This is followed by multidisciplinary team care, discharge planning and right siting of care from the ED to community-based services by ED case managers. The primary outcomes were hospital (re)admissions and ED re-attendances within 30- and 60 days post-discharge. Secondary outcomes were cost avoidance and bed occupancy days from reduced acute hospital usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearest-neighbour 1:1 propensity score matching matched 1615 intervention group to 1615 control group. Baseline characteristics of the intervention and control groups did not differ significantly. Difference-in-differences (DID) analyses showed significantly lower 30-day (3.96%; 95% CI 2.71-5.23%) and 60-day (6.69%; 95% CI 5.47-7.91%) hospital admissions, as well as 30-day (4.89%; 95% CI 3.83-5.95%) and 60-day (6.50%; 95% CI 5.28-7.72%) ED re-attendances in the intervention group compared to the control group. Additionally, the reduced admission and ED re-attendance rates resulted in 30-day and 60-day inpatient admission costs avoidance [$1 553 548.96 (69.86%); 95% CI $1 525 827.76 to $1 581 270.15; P = .006; and $1 400 047.07 (32.56%); 95% CI $1 365 484.79 to $1434 609.37; P = .048, respectively], ED attendance costs avoidance [$25 849.92 (23.70%); 95% CI $25 091.93 to $26 607.89; P = .096; and $37 538.39 (18.09%); 95% CI $36 470.27 to $38 606.53; P = .086, respectively] and bed occupancy days saved (1212 days; 95% CI 1191.80 days to 1232.20 days; P = .003; and 1267 days; 95% CI 1242.58 days to 1291.42 days; P = .011, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CARED program effectively reduced unplanned hospital use within 30- and 60 days post-ED discharge for at-risk patients. It also significantly lowered inpatient admission and ED attendance costs and hospital bed occupancy days, highlighting its potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare expenses.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitals face mounting pressure to reduce unplanned utilization amid rising healthcare demands from an aging population. The Case management for At-Risk patients in the Emergency Department (CARED) program is among the first ED transitional care strategies to focus on both frail older adults and emergency department (ED) re-attenders to reduce acute hospital utilization. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the CARED program in reducing hospital (re)admissions and ED re-attendances within 30- and 60 days post-discharge.

Methods: A retrospective, propensity-matched study was conducted from April 2022 to July 2023 in the ED of Ng Teng Fong General Hospital in Singapore. The CARED program identifies and enrols at-risk patients, i.e. frail older adults and patients who re-attend the ED within 30 days of hospital discharge, for a geriatric assessment. This is followed by multidisciplinary team care, discharge planning and right siting of care from the ED to community-based services by ED case managers. The primary outcomes were hospital (re)admissions and ED re-attendances within 30- and 60 days post-discharge. Secondary outcomes were cost avoidance and bed occupancy days from reduced acute hospital usage.

Results: Nearest-neighbour 1:1 propensity score matching matched 1615 intervention group to 1615 control group. Baseline characteristics of the intervention and control groups did not differ significantly. Difference-in-differences (DID) analyses showed significantly lower 30-day (3.96%; 95% CI 2.71-5.23%) and 60-day (6.69%; 95% CI 5.47-7.91%) hospital admissions, as well as 30-day (4.89%; 95% CI 3.83-5.95%) and 60-day (6.50%; 95% CI 5.28-7.72%) ED re-attendances in the intervention group compared to the control group. Additionally, the reduced admission and ED re-attendance rates resulted in 30-day and 60-day inpatient admission costs avoidance [$1 553 548.96 (69.86%); 95% CI $1 525 827.76 to $1 581 270.15; P = .006; and $1 400 047.07 (32.56%); 95% CI $1 365 484.79 to $1434 609.37; P = .048, respectively], ED attendance costs avoidance [$25 849.92 (23.70%); 95% CI $25 091.93 to $26 607.89; P = .096; and $37 538.39 (18.09%); 95% CI $36 470.27 to $38 606.53; P = .086, respectively] and bed occupancy days saved (1212 days; 95% CI 1191.80 days to 1232.20 days; P = .003; and 1267 days; 95% CI 1242.58 days to 1291.42 days; P = .011, respectively).

Conclusion: CARED program effectively reduced unplanned hospital use within 30- and 60 days post-ED discharge for at-risk patients. It also significantly lowered inpatient admission and ED attendance costs and hospital bed occupancy days, highlighting its potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare expenses.

急诊护理的个案管理:护理计划的影响评估。
背景:随着人口老龄化对医疗保健需求的增加,医院面临越来越大的压力,以减少计划外的利用。急诊科(care)项目中高危患者的病例管理是首批急诊科过渡护理策略之一,重点关注体弱的老年人和急诊科(ED)再就诊者,以减少急性住院利用率。本研究旨在评估护理计划在减少出院后30天和60天内住院(再)住院和急诊科再住院率方面的有效性。方法:从2022年4月至2023年7月,在新加坡吴廷芳总医院的急诊科进行了一项回顾性、倾向匹配的研究。care项目识别并招募有风险的患者,即体弱的老年人和出院后30天内再次到急诊室就诊的患者,进行老年评估。其次是多学科团队护理,出院计划和正确的护理地点,从急诊科到急诊科病例管理人员的社区服务。主要结局是出院后30天和60天内住院(再)率和急诊科复诊率。次要结果是成本的降低和减少急性住院使用的床位占用天数。结果:干预组1615例,对照组1615例。干预组和对照组的基线特征无显著差异。差异中差异(DID)分析显示30天显著降低(3.96%;95% CI 2.71%至5.23%)和60天(6.69%;95% CI 5.47%至7.91%)住院,以及30天(4.89%;95% CI 3.83%至5.95%)和60天(6.50%;(95% CI 5.28% ~ 7.72%)干预组ED复诊率与对照组比较。此外,入院率和急诊复诊率的降低导致30天和60天住院费用的减少(1,553,548.96美元(69.86%);95% CI $1,525,827.76至1,581,270.15;P = 0.006;1,400,047.07美元(32.56%);95% CI $1,365,484.79至1,434,609.37;P = 0.048), ED出勤成本规避($25,849.92 (23.70%);95%置信区间为25,091.93至26,607.89美元;P = 0.096;37,538.39美元(18.09%);95%可信区间为$36,470.27至$38,606.53;P = 0.086),节省床位天数(1212天;95% CI 1191.80 ~ 1232.20天;P = 0.003;1267天;95% CI 1,242.58 ~ 1,291.42天;P = 0.011)。结论:护理方案有效地减少了高危患者出院后30天和60天内的计划外住院。它还显著降低了住院和急诊费用以及医院床位占用天数,突出了其改善患者预后和降低医疗保健费用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信