Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Halo-Femoral Traction and Halo-Gravity Traction Techniques in Severe Kyphoscoliosis With Spinal Cord Risk Classification (SCRC) Type 3 Over the Apex.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yuan-Shun Lo, Erh-Ti Ernest Lin, Chen-Wei Yeh, Michael Jian-Wen Chen, Cheng-Hung Chiang, Chun-Hao Tsai, Yi-Chin Fong, Pao-Lung Chang, Yen-Jen Chen, Hsien-Te Chen, Yong Qiu
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Halo-Femoral Traction and Halo-Gravity Traction Techniques in Severe Kyphoscoliosis With Spinal Cord Risk Classification (SCRC) Type 3 Over the Apex.","authors":"Yuan-Shun Lo, Erh-Ti Ernest Lin, Chen-Wei Yeh, Michael Jian-Wen Chen, Cheng-Hung Chiang, Chun-Hao Tsai, Yi-Chin Fong, Pao-Lung Chang, Yen-Jen Chen, Hsien-Te Chen, Yong Qiu","doi":"10.1177/21925682251314382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the efficacy and safety of Halo-femoral traction (HFT) following spinal release, and preoperative Halo-gravity traction (HGT) in patients with severe spinal kyphoscoliosis and spinal cord risk classification (SCRC) type 3 at the apex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 73 patients (24 males, 49 females, mean age 22.4 ± 6.4 years) and 56 patients (15 males, 41 females, mean age 22.9 ± 10.4 years) were included in the HFT and HGT group, respectively. Radiographic parameters were measured at the initial assessment, post-traction, post-final surgery, and during each follow-up. Neurologic function was assessed using the Frankel score system. IONM alerts and all complications were documented. Quality-of-life was evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the HFT vs HGT group, the total correction rates were 39.9 ± 7.2% v.s. 41.3 ± 6.8% for the major Cobb and 36.6 ± 9.3% v.s. 44.4 ± 9.2% for global kyphosis (GK) after final surgery, respectively. The traction contributions were 57.6 ± 11.1% v.s. 52.3 ± 9.3% for major Cobb and 70.1 ± 10.5% v.s. 63.9 ± 11.1% for global kyphosis (GK), respectively. More than half of the total correction can be achieved gradually and safely through preoperative traction with patients in an awake state. No deterioration in neurological function was found post-final surgery. During the last follow-up, SF-36 questionnaire scores improved significantly in both groups (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant outcomes can be expected in patients with severe kyphoscoliosis, even with spinal cord risk classification (SCRC) type 3 at the apex undergoing HFT and HGT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251314382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251314382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of Halo-femoral traction (HFT) following spinal release, and preoperative Halo-gravity traction (HGT) in patients with severe spinal kyphoscoliosis and spinal cord risk classification (SCRC) type 3 at the apex.

Methods: A total of 73 patients (24 males, 49 females, mean age 22.4 ± 6.4 years) and 56 patients (15 males, 41 females, mean age 22.9 ± 10.4 years) were included in the HFT and HGT group, respectively. Radiographic parameters were measured at the initial assessment, post-traction, post-final surgery, and during each follow-up. Neurologic function was assessed using the Frankel score system. IONM alerts and all complications were documented. Quality-of-life was evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire.

Results: In the HFT vs HGT group, the total correction rates were 39.9 ± 7.2% v.s. 41.3 ± 6.8% for the major Cobb and 36.6 ± 9.3% v.s. 44.4 ± 9.2% for global kyphosis (GK) after final surgery, respectively. The traction contributions were 57.6 ± 11.1% v.s. 52.3 ± 9.3% for major Cobb and 70.1 ± 10.5% v.s. 63.9 ± 11.1% for global kyphosis (GK), respectively. More than half of the total correction can be achieved gradually and safely through preoperative traction with patients in an awake state. No deterioration in neurological function was found post-final surgery. During the last follow-up, SF-36 questionnaire scores improved significantly in both groups (P < .05).

Conclusions: Significant outcomes can be expected in patients with severe kyphoscoliosis, even with spinal cord risk classification (SCRC) type 3 at the apex undergoing HFT and HGT.

评价halo -股骨牵引和halo -重力牵引技术在脊髓危险分级(SCRC) 3型超过尖端的严重后凸性脊柱侧凸中的疗效和安全性。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:分析脊柱松解后halo -股骨牵引(HFT)和术前halo -重力牵引(HGT)治疗重度脊柱后凸及顶端脊髓危险分级(SCRC)为3型的患者的疗效和安全性。方法:HFT组73例(男24例,女49例,平均年龄22.4±6.4岁),HGT组56例(男15例,女41例,平均年龄22.9±10.4岁)。在初始评估、牵引后、最终手术后和每次随访期间测量影像学参数。采用Frankel评分系统评估神经功能。记录了IONM警报和所有并发症。使用SF-36问卷评估生活质量。结果:HFT组与HGT组术后总矫正率分别为39.9±7.2%、41.3±6.8%、36.6±9.3%、44.4±9.2%。牵引作用分别为57.6±11.1%、52.3±9.3%、70.1±10.5%、63.9±11.1%。患者在清醒状态下通过术前牵引,可以逐渐安全地完成一半以上的矫正。术后未见神经功能恶化。末次随访时,两组SF-36问卷得分均有显著提高(P < 0.05)。结论:严重后凸性脊柱侧凸患者,即使脊髓风险分类(SCRC)为3型,接受HFT和HGT治疗,也可以获得显著的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信