The benefits and harms of oral iron supplementation in non-anaemic pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Archie Watt, Holden Eaton, Kate Eastwick-Jones, Elizabeth T Thomas, Annette Plüddemann
{"title":"The benefits and harms of oral iron supplementation in non-anaemic pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Archie Watt, Holden Eaton, Kate Eastwick-Jones, Elizabeth T Thomas, Annette Plüddemann","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Iron deficiency during pregnancy poses a significant risk to both maternal and foetal health. Current international guidelines provide discrepant advice on antenatal iron supplementation for non-anaemic women.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to quantify the benefits and harms of routine antenatal supplementation in non-anaemic women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing oral iron supplementation with placebo or no supplement in non-anaemic pregnant women. Risk of bias was assessed for each study and the results were synthesized via meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three eligible studies were identified with 4492 non-anaemic pregnant women. Supplemented groups had higher haemoglobin [mean difference = 6.95 g/l, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.81-9.09, P < .001, moderate certainty, I2 = 91%] and ferritin (mean difference = 12.22 ng/ml, 95% CI: 6.92-17.52, P < .001, moderate certainty, I2 = 87%) and were at lower risk of anaemia (relative risk = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34-0.74, P < .001, high certainty, I2 = 42%, number needed to treat (NNT) = 10). There was no difference in birth weight, preterm birth, and rate of caesarean section. Reporting on harms was inconsistent and there was insufficient evidence to determine an association between iron supplements and any negative outcome.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Prophylactic iron supplementation likely results in a large reduction in maternal anaemia during pregnancy. Future research should qualify the impact of this benefit on women's quality of life and determine which subpopulations benefit most. Evidence surrounding the harms of iron supplementation in the non-anaemic population is poor quality and inconsistent. Randomized controlled trials quantifying the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) disturbance and iron overload are essential to inform iron supplement use and reduce unwarranted variations in international guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Iron deficiency during pregnancy poses a significant risk to both maternal and foetal health. Current international guidelines provide discrepant advice on antenatal iron supplementation for non-anaemic women.

Objective: We aimed to quantify the benefits and harms of routine antenatal supplementation in non-anaemic women.

Methods: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing oral iron supplementation with placebo or no supplement in non-anaemic pregnant women. Risk of bias was assessed for each study and the results were synthesized via meta-analysis.

Results: Twenty-three eligible studies were identified with 4492 non-anaemic pregnant women. Supplemented groups had higher haemoglobin [mean difference = 6.95 g/l, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.81-9.09, P < .001, moderate certainty, I2 = 91%] and ferritin (mean difference = 12.22 ng/ml, 95% CI: 6.92-17.52, P < .001, moderate certainty, I2 = 87%) and were at lower risk of anaemia (relative risk = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34-0.74, P < .001, high certainty, I2 = 42%, number needed to treat (NNT) = 10). There was no difference in birth weight, preterm birth, and rate of caesarean section. Reporting on harms was inconsistent and there was insufficient evidence to determine an association between iron supplements and any negative outcome.

Discussion: Prophylactic iron supplementation likely results in a large reduction in maternal anaemia during pregnancy. Future research should qualify the impact of this benefit on women's quality of life and determine which subpopulations benefit most. Evidence surrounding the harms of iron supplementation in the non-anaemic population is poor quality and inconsistent. Randomized controlled trials quantifying the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) disturbance and iron overload are essential to inform iron supplement use and reduce unwarranted variations in international guidelines.

非贫血孕妇口服补铁的利弊:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:怀孕期间缺铁对孕产妇和胎儿健康都有重大风险。目前的国际指南对非贫血妇女的产前补铁提供了不同的建议。目的:我们旨在量化非贫血妇女常规产前补充的益处和危害。方法:检索Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、Embase和临床试验注册库,比较非贫血孕妇口服补铁与安慰剂或不补铁的随机对照试验和观察性研究。对每项研究进行偏倚风险评估,并通过荟萃分析对结果进行综合。结果:23项符合条件的研究纳入了4492名非贫血孕妇。补充组血红蛋白较高[平均差值= 6.95 g/l, 95%可信区间(CI): 4.81-9.09, P]讨论:预防性补充铁可能导致妊娠期间孕产妇贫血的大幅减少。未来的研究应确定这种益处对妇女生活质量的影响,并确定哪些亚群受益最大。关于在非贫血人群中补充铁的危害的证据质量差且不一致。量化胃肠道(GI)紊乱和铁超载风险的随机对照试验对铁补充剂的使用和减少国际指南中不必要的变化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信