Risk Factors for Residual Unablated Tumour Following CT-Guided Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation: Lessons from the EuRECA Registry.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alexander J King, Retha Steenkamp, Ole Graumann, Tze Min Wah, Des Alcorn, Tommy Kjaergaard Nielsen, Eric de Kerviler, Patricia J Zondervan, Miles Walkden, Brunolf Lagerveld, Marco Van Strijen, Francis X Keeley, David J Breen
{"title":"Risk Factors for Residual Unablated Tumour Following CT-Guided Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation: Lessons from the EuRECA Registry.","authors":"Alexander J King, Retha Steenkamp, Ole Graumann, Tze Min Wah, Des Alcorn, Tommy Kjaergaard Nielsen, Eric de Kerviler, Patricia J Zondervan, Miles Walkden, Brunolf Lagerveld, Marco Van Strijen, Francis X Keeley, David J Breen","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03951-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess tumour factors that reduce primary technical efficacy (PTE) from CT-guided renal cryoablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were taken from the EuRECA registry between December 2014 and November 2020. To focus on tumour factors rather than individual technique, this study was limited to cases using CT and excluded procedures using cone beam, US, MRI, or laparoscopy. PTE was assessed per tumour and defined as complete ablation of the target on enhanced CT or MRI by 90 days. Residual unablated tumour (RUT) was defined as focal persistent tumour enhancement within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,424 tumours from 11 different centres were eligible; 38 episodes of RUT were detected giving an overall PTE of 97.3%. The factors most likely to be associated with RUT were as follows and persisted in multivariate logistic regression. Tumour contact with a central artery or vein; increased OR of 5.29 (CI 2.59-10.81 p < 0.001), PTE was 89.8% in this group. Tumours size; T1b vs T1a increased OR of 2.31 (CI 1.10-4.87 p = 0.0276), T1b PTE was 94.1% vs T1a PTE 97.9%. Close proximity to the collecting system (< 4 mm) was significant at univariate logistic regression (OR 2.87, P = 0.028), as was a RENAL complexity score of 10 or above (OR 2.71, p = 0.0147), but neither was significant in the multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, CT-guided percutaneous renal cryoablation has a high PTE at 97.3%. In this analysis, the most significant risk factor for RUT is central renal vessel contact. T1b tumours are also noted to have an increased risk of RUT compared to T1a.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"196-204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03951-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess tumour factors that reduce primary technical efficacy (PTE) from CT-guided renal cryoablation.

Methods: Patients were taken from the EuRECA registry between December 2014 and November 2020. To focus on tumour factors rather than individual technique, this study was limited to cases using CT and excluded procedures using cone beam, US, MRI, or laparoscopy. PTE was assessed per tumour and defined as complete ablation of the target on enhanced CT or MRI by 90 days. Residual unablated tumour (RUT) was defined as focal persistent tumour enhancement within 90 days.

Results: A total of 1,424 tumours from 11 different centres were eligible; 38 episodes of RUT were detected giving an overall PTE of 97.3%. The factors most likely to be associated with RUT were as follows and persisted in multivariate logistic regression. Tumour contact with a central artery or vein; increased OR of 5.29 (CI 2.59-10.81 p < 0.001), PTE was 89.8% in this group. Tumours size; T1b vs T1a increased OR of 2.31 (CI 1.10-4.87 p = 0.0276), T1b PTE was 94.1% vs T1a PTE 97.9%. Close proximity to the collecting system (< 4 mm) was significant at univariate logistic regression (OR 2.87, P = 0.028), as was a RENAL complexity score of 10 or above (OR 2.71, p = 0.0147), but neither was significant in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Overall, CT-guided percutaneous renal cryoablation has a high PTE at 97.3%. In this analysis, the most significant risk factor for RUT is central renal vessel contact. T1b tumours are also noted to have an increased risk of RUT compared to T1a.

ct引导下经皮肾冷冻消融后残留未缩小肿瘤的危险因素:来自EuRECA注册的经验教训。
目的:探讨影响ct引导下肾冷冻消融初级技术疗效(PTE)的肿瘤因素。方法:2014年12月至2020年11月期间,患者从EuRECA登记处获得。为了关注肿瘤因素而不是个别技术,本研究仅限于使用CT的病例,并排除了使用锥束、超声、MRI或腹腔镜的手术。对每个肿瘤进行PTE评估,并将其定义为增强CT或MRI在90天内完全消融目标。残余未消退肿瘤(RUT)定义为90天内局灶性持续性肿瘤增强。结果:来自11个不同中心的1424个肿瘤符合条件;共检出38例RUT,总PTE为97.3%。最可能与RUT相关的因素如下,并在多因素logistic回归中持续存在。肿瘤与中心动脉或静脉接触;结论:总体而言,ct引导下经皮肾冷冻消融的PTE较高,为97.3%。在本分析中,RUT最重要的危险因素是中央肾血管接触。与T1a相比,T1b肿瘤也有更高的RUT风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信