A meta-analysis of the utility of cryotherapy for preventing peripheral neuropathy among breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Prashanth Ashok Kumar, Parth Sampat, Michael Sandhu, Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar, Abigail Smith, Shweta Paulraj, Ghanshyam Ghelani, Danning Huang, Dongliang Wang, Abirami Sivapiragasam
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the utility of cryotherapy for preventing peripheral neuropathy among breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel.","authors":"Prashanth Ashok Kumar, Parth Sampat, Michael Sandhu, Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar, Abigail Smith, Shweta Paulraj, Ghanshyam Ghelani, Danning Huang, Dongliang Wang, Abirami Sivapiragasam","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07597-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryotherapy with taxane infusion is a noninvasive strategy for preventing peripheral neuropathy (PN), but the efficacy of this approach has not been proven.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted, and 477 records were initially identified. The titles were screened independently by 2 reviewers. Fourteen studies were ultimately included for meta-analysis, which was conducted using the meta package in the R software. Only studies that analysed cryotherapy use in breast cancer patients who received paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel were included. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated using the random effects model to compare the occurrence of PN between the paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 2 PN was 24.85% (81/326) in the cryotherapy arm and 42.35% (72/170) in the placebo arm. The overall RR CTCAE grade ≥ 2 PN in the cryotherapy group compared with the placebo group was 0.45 [0.27, 0.77, p = 0.0031]. The RR for sensory PN was 0.19 [0.05, 0.66, p = 0.009], and that for motor PN was 0.18 [0.03, 0.99, p = 0.0491]. The RR for Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) scores ≥ D, which indicate severe neuropathy, was 0.24 [0.09, 0.62; p = 0.0035]. Cold intolerance was the most reported t adverse effect, with a prevalence of 15% (37/247).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of cryotherapy decreased the occurrence of CTCAE grade ≥ 2 PN by 55%. Cold intolerance was the most frequently reported adverse effect associated with cryotherapy, but this adverse effect did not lead to high discontinuation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07597-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cryotherapy with taxane infusion is a noninvasive strategy for preventing peripheral neuropathy (PN), but the efficacy of this approach has not been proven.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted, and 477 records were initially identified. The titles were screened independently by 2 reviewers. Fourteen studies were ultimately included for meta-analysis, which was conducted using the meta package in the R software. Only studies that analysed cryotherapy use in breast cancer patients who received paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel were included. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated using the random effects model to compare the occurrence of PN between the paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel groups.

Results: The incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 2 PN was 24.85% (81/326) in the cryotherapy arm and 42.35% (72/170) in the placebo arm. The overall RR CTCAE grade ≥ 2 PN in the cryotherapy group compared with the placebo group was 0.45 [0.27, 0.77, p = 0.0031]. The RR for sensory PN was 0.19 [0.05, 0.66, p = 0.009], and that for motor PN was 0.18 [0.03, 0.99, p = 0.0491]. The RR for Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) scores ≥ D, which indicate severe neuropathy, was 0.24 [0.09, 0.62; p = 0.0035]. Cold intolerance was the most reported t adverse effect, with a prevalence of 15% (37/247).

Conclusions: The use of cryotherapy decreased the occurrence of CTCAE grade ≥ 2 PN by 55%. Cold intolerance was the most frequently reported adverse effect associated with cryotherapy, but this adverse effect did not lead to high discontinuation rates.

冷冻疗法预防接受紫杉醇和nab-紫杉醇治疗的乳腺癌患者周围神经病变的meta分析。
背景:紫杉烷输注冷冻治疗是一种预防周围神经病变(PN)的无创策略,但这种方法的有效性尚未得到证实。方法:系统检索,初步筛选出477例。标题由2名审稿人独立筛选。最终纳入14项研究进行meta分析,使用R软件中的meta包进行。仅纳入了对接受紫杉醇或nab-紫杉醇治疗的乳腺癌患者进行冷冻治疗的研究。采用随机效应模型计算相对危险度(rr),比较紫杉醇组和nab-紫杉醇组PN的发生情况。结果:不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)≥2级PN发生率在冷冻治疗组为24.85%(81/326),在安慰剂组为42.35%(72/170)。与安慰剂组相比,冷冻治疗组总RR CTCAE分级≥2 PN为0.45 [0.27,0.77,p = 0.0031]。感觉PN的RR为0.19 [0.05,0.66,p = 0.009],运动PN的RR为0.18 [0.03,0.99,p = 0.0491]。患者神经毒性问卷(PNQ)评分≥D提示严重神经病变的RR为0.24 [0.09,0.62;p = 0.0035]。冷不耐受是报告最多的不良反应,患病率为15%(37/247)。结论:冷冻治疗使CTCAE≥2级PN发生率降低55%。寒冷不耐受是与冷冻治疗相关的最常见的不良反应,但这种不良反应并没有导致高停药率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信