Tracking individual seed fate confirms mainly antagonistic interactions between rodents and European beech.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Biology Letters Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2024.0586
Frederik Sachser, Georg Gratzer, Mario B Pesendorfer, Heino Konrad, Iris Kempter, Ursula Nopp-Mayr
{"title":"Tracking individual seed fate confirms mainly antagonistic interactions between rodents and European beech.","authors":"Frederik Sachser, Georg Gratzer, Mario B Pesendorfer, Heino Konrad, Iris Kempter, Ursula Nopp-Mayr","doi":"10.1098/rsbl.2024.0586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Food-hoarding granivores act as both predators and dispersers of plant seeds, resulting in facultative species interactions along a mutualism-antagonism continuum. The position along this continuum is determined by the positive and negative interactions that vary with the ratio between seed availability and animal abundance, particularly for mast-seeding species with interannual variation and spatial synchrony of seed production. Empirical data on the entire fate of seeds up to germination and the influence of rodents on seed survival is rare, resulting in a lack of consensus on their position along the mutualism-antagonism continuum. Here, we quantified annual seed rain and rodent abundance in an old-growth European beech forest and tracked 639 beechnuts to the seedling stage with 84% of seeds successfully located. Over 4 study years that covered the range of seed-to-rodent ratios, not a single seed successfully germinated after dispersal, illustrating a predominantly antagonistic interaction between rodents and seeds of European beech. Therefore, our findings do not support the predator dispersal hypothesis and partially contradict the predator satiation hypothesis, as the highest number of germinants and intact seeds were found <i>in situ</i> after an intermediate seed crop, not a bumper crop. Our results underline the necessity to track seeds up to germination.</p>","PeriodicalId":9005,"journal":{"name":"Biology Letters","volume":"21 1","pages":"20240586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2024.0586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food-hoarding granivores act as both predators and dispersers of plant seeds, resulting in facultative species interactions along a mutualism-antagonism continuum. The position along this continuum is determined by the positive and negative interactions that vary with the ratio between seed availability and animal abundance, particularly for mast-seeding species with interannual variation and spatial synchrony of seed production. Empirical data on the entire fate of seeds up to germination and the influence of rodents on seed survival is rare, resulting in a lack of consensus on their position along the mutualism-antagonism continuum. Here, we quantified annual seed rain and rodent abundance in an old-growth European beech forest and tracked 639 beechnuts to the seedling stage with 84% of seeds successfully located. Over 4 study years that covered the range of seed-to-rodent ratios, not a single seed successfully germinated after dispersal, illustrating a predominantly antagonistic interaction between rodents and seeds of European beech. Therefore, our findings do not support the predator dispersal hypothesis and partially contradict the predator satiation hypothesis, as the highest number of germinants and intact seeds were found in situ after an intermediate seed crop, not a bumper crop. Our results underline the necessity to track seeds up to germination.

追踪单个种子的命运证实了啮齿动物和欧洲山毛榉之间主要的拮抗相互作用。
囤积食物的花岗岩动物既是植物种子的捕食者,也是种子的传播者,导致了共生-对抗连续体上的兼性物种相互作用。这一连续体的位置取决于种子可得性与动物丰度之间的正、负相互作用,尤其是种子产量具有年际变化和空间同步性的顶播物种。关于种子直至发芽的整个命运以及啮齿动物对种子存活的影响的经验数据很少,导致在它们在互惠-对抗连续体中的位置缺乏共识。在这里,我们量化了欧洲原始山毛榉森林的年种子雨和啮齿动物丰度,并追踪了639颗山毛榉的幼苗期,其中84%的种子成功定位。在覆盖种子与啮齿动物比例范围的4年研究中,没有一颗种子在传播后成功发芽,说明啮齿动物与欧洲山毛榉种子之间的相互作用主要是拮抗作用。因此,我们的研究结果不支持捕食者分散假说,并在一定程度上与捕食者饱和假说相矛盾,因为在中间种子作物而不是丰收作物之后,在原地发现了最多的发芽和完整种子。我们的结果强调了跟踪种子直至发芽的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology Letters
Biology Letters 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
164
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Previously a supplement to Proceedings B, and launched as an independent journal in 2005, Biology Letters is a primarily online, peer-reviewed journal that publishes short, high-quality articles, reviews and opinion pieces from across the biological sciences. The scope of Biology Letters is vast - publishing high-quality research in any area of the biological sciences. However, we have particular strengths in the biology, evolution and ecology of whole organisms. We also publish in other areas of biology, such as molecular ecology and evolution, environmental science, and phylogenetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信